So we meet again in 10 days time? Hopefully they can sort out that pitch over there!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All over, why did the 10th batsman bother coming out if there was only one ball left?
Run out off a no ball, stumping/run out off a wide. See your point though as both are very unlikely occurrences.
Yeah, guess we're not talking about Pakistan from a few years back.Would also be very suspicious in those circumstances. He would have to be ******ed to even leave his crease
Yes & YesCouple of things I noticed from the dismissals. Did Maxwell bowl a carton/knuckle ball to get Agar out?
And the short leg fielder was absurdly close on the Bosisto wicket.
You had 3 batsmen in contention for a test spot next week? And another made a ton. You bat all the way down to Agar at 8 who's averaging 50 this year.Siddle having a sook that WA didn't have a crack. Look at the team we had muppet, we did fantastically well to hang on and draw (Langer responded with basically the same thing).
Bosisto - 5 FC matchesYou had 3 batsmen in contention for a test spot next week? And another made a ton. You bat all the way down to Agar at 8 who's averaging 50 this year.
I would have thought WA would have went for it a bit more on a very flat wicket. Not that I'd be too upset about it though, Victoria did alright out of the points.
Bosisto - 5 FC matches
Beaton - 11 FC matches
Cartwright - 5 FC matches
Moody - 4 FC matches
Tye - 6 FC matches
But sure, we were a strong, experienced side...
Not making an excuse for the draw, but Siddle making public statements without providing context makes him look like a flog.
Tye and Cartwright bat 9 and 10, you can't tell me they had anything to do with why WA chose not to chase the runs. WA still had Klinger, Marsh, Bancroft, Whiteman and Agar.
A match spans 4 days and 4 innings right? The impact of bowlers has an influence on the impact of batsmen. If WA had some more time and/or less runs to chase, they may have gone harder. The bowlers have an influence in this regard. WA ended up 8 down, they were never going to chase down the total in the time given.
Sounds like you are just making excuses for not winning now. No ones talking about the first 3 innings, WA had 110 overs to make 380 odd. On a very flat wicket, with 3 guys fighting for a spot for Australia and a guy batting 8 that averages 50 for the year and nearly made a hundred for his country, that sounds like a gettable target. Maybe I have more confidence in your batting lineup than you do.
Anyway, you guys played it safe and ended up with a couple of points, I hold no grudges, just thought at the time you might of had a go at it.
Never attempted the chase at all - which was surprising as there was zero in the trackI guess the fact that we were 8 down by the end means we played it smart. I would imagine of wickets did not fall regularly we would have chased harder. Siddle was sooking about the whole match in general and not specifically the first innings.
I guess the fact that we were 8 down by the end means we played it smart. I would imagine of wickets did not fall regularly we would have chased harder. Siddle was sooking about the whole match in general and not specifically the first innings.
so he will be appearing on the x factor tv show?Sids bowled well and did his job - Patto has X Factor
yeah pity Dean failed even with his 80 odd in the first innings. now knowing CV he will be dropped for the rest of the season for his failure to back up his effort from his first gameDean actually failed? Don't tell me he is human after all?
thats still lower than his bowling averageAgar averaging 52.75 with the bat this season. Even more impressive given he bats with spuds a fair bit.
Was certainly very unlucky today given how much he had to shield the other batsmen.