- Aug 9, 2012
- 11,162
- 6,123
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Banned
- #751
Doesn't really mean much since Obama will send his DEA goons to tear s**t up.
It wouldn't surprise me if he jumped on state initiated impetus to wind back the war.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Doesn't really mean much since Obama will send his DEA goons to tear s**t up.
Why? It hasn't stopped him in California or Colorado so far.
Hasn't stopped him so far.He would be defying the popular vote.
Hasn't stopped him so far.
What's the difference between medicinal and recreational when both have been brought in due to the popular vote? It's still illegal federally.
How so?It will completely changed the dynamics of the Fed's case in overriding state rights, I would imagine.
Obama has won the vote in Colorado by 50% to 47%. Colorado is a swing state.
Which is why there was deafening silence on the issue this year from the Democrats.
They didnt want to upset liberals (who tend to support legalisation) in such an important swing state during an election year.
Now the election is dusted, theyll stomp all over this.
I'd be inclined to put money on this prediction
Leading Anti-Marijuana Academics Are Paid By Painkiller Drug Companies
As Americans continue to embrace pot—as medicine and for recreational use—opponents are turning to a set of academic researchers to claim that policymakers should avoid relaxing restrictions around marijuana. It's too dangerous, risky, and untested, they say. Just as drug company-funded research has become incredibly controversial in recent years, forcing major medical schools and journals to institute strict disclosure requirements, could there be a conflict of interest issue in the pot debate?
VICE has found that many of the researchers who have advocated against legalizing pot have also been on the payroll of leading pharmaceutical firms with products that could be easily replaced by using marijuana. When these individuals have been quoted in the media, their drug-industry ties have not been revealed.
No surprise there
You got a problem with that too? What doesn't offend you mate?There's also the issue that the pro campaigners like to overstate its effects or those pushing for legalisation are doing so simply because they want to get high every night.
It is in no way I get offended by people smoking marijuana I get annoyed with the tools out who are high on the s**t.You got a problem with that too? What doesn't offend you mate?
A shocking evening at Daytripper's house.
It is in no way I get offended by people smoking marijuana I get annoyed with the tools out who are high on the s**t.
I would imagine a quick canvas of Emergency on any given Saturday night will suggest to you it's not dope that's the problem in pubs and clubs.How the hell are they annoying you? (couldn't be more more annoying than your breathtakingly simple-minded posts)