That's not how it works. If you nominate, you don't nominate what he's worth. By nominating a player the club is making a commitment to the said player. If another club bids, we have the option to match. If no club bids, we are obliged to take the player with our final pick.
The club went to the draft intending to only use 4 picks. If Hine had rated Stewart at pick 38 or earlier, I'm sure he would have nominated him. As it is, it looks like Hine had him rated around the same time as most pundits, which was 3rd to fourth round. Therefore, if we nominated Stewart and he was not bid on before pick 38, we would have been obliged to use a 5th pick, which was not in our plans.
Whether Hine got it wrong about Stewarts talent is a seperate argument, but the reasoning behind not nominating him was sound.
For what it's worth, I think Stewart would have been a good pick up at 38, but such is life. Hine isn't perfect, but he is still one of the best recruiters in the league. I can forgive stuff ups on speculative picks if he keeps unearthing gems like Langdon and Marsh.
I know that , we would hav an idea of what WE think hes worth, INTERNALLY AT THE CLUB , Ie late 2nd round early third rd etc, pointless telling other clubs that as they will undercut u
Last edited: