Nostradamus Lives Tex to stay, Dangerfield to leave

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Troystenvic said:
Sick of Hawks fans crying. YOU were the team that let Kennedy and McGlynn go. YOU had the option to match Buddys deal. Adelaide made a meal of the Tippett saga. Sydney just played it smart. Sydney could get Danger with Goodes ROK and LRT retiring soon. Players might take a pay cut for success. Not every player plays for just the pay checks. Danger to the swans.
Click to expand...
Danger is not going to NSW. Its Vic or staying in Adelaide. FFS
 
Go the Guts said:
"Most liveable" has nothing to do with income. It is to do with the aspects that make a city appealing to live in. And Adelaide is ahead of Sydney. Whether you like it or not. Taking cheap shots says a lot about you though, if that's your only comeback. You started this btw.
Click to expand...
If I can afford a Bentley Continental GT I am not sure I would choose a Toyota Camry based on higher rankings on fuel efficiency and maintenance costs. However I fully understand why such rankings and awards exist.

Anyway I actually hope Dangerfield stays with the Crows. Best of luck.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Number37 said:
You want to conveniently forget that your club must have room in your cap for at least 90.2% of the contract?
The $902,000 he gets is irrelevant to the $98,000 extra he gets from the AFL?

I don't begrudge other clubs their success. My club got smashed, moved out of Victoria all while Hawks were getting the best of zones back then. You didn't give a s**t about us then, now that we are becoming super powerful you want to cry about it. Boo hooo hooo, have a sook with McGuire, Gordon and the rest of the hypocrite brigade.
Click to expand...

Having a zone and drafting from it, then having to develop those players is a lot different to being given extra money to poach developed players from other clubs who don't have the same amount of money to spend, and all because the AFL want to grow the game in Sydney.

Besides, the issue is not just Hawthorn supporter's.

We'll see who is crying when the Swans have to play(pay) by the same rules as everyone else.
 
Echols said:
Having a zone and drafting from it, then having to develop those players is a lot different to being given extra money to poach developed players from other clubs who don't have the same amount of money to spend, and all because the AFL want to grow the game in Sydney.

Besides, the issue is not just Hawthorn supporter's.

We'll see who is crying when the Swans have to play(pay) by the same rules as everyone else.
Click to expand...
Stick to the topic mod. :rolleyes:
 
If Geelong are in serious grand final contention over the next few years and Adeliade are lucky to make it past the first week of finals then I'd say there's a pretty good bet he'd come here :D
 
Yeah if your gonna turn the grill on you gotta cook the sausages!
 
I've got a better rumour...Danger, Tex and Sloane are all best mates and will stay at the Crows for their whole careers and win a flag together....

Awesome
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Roo Lives Again said:
I've got a better rumour...Danger, Tex and Sloane are all best mates and will stay at the Crows for their whole careers and win a flag together....

Awesome
Click to expand...
I thought Tex and Bernie were best mates, how's Bernie's season at the crows going this year?
 
Classy way to treat your players. Pimp him out for a draft pick cause you got caught tampering with the draft. :oops:
 
Bailey01 said:
Didn't you push Podsiadly and Chapman out the door? #classy
Click to expand...
Not at all. Chapman was offered a contract extension. Podsiadly was under performing 32 year old whose contract was over.
Both players had opportunities to stay at the Cats in various capacities and chose to exercise their option to go elsewhere.
When it became evident they wanted to pursue opportunities elsewhere we did the classy thing and traded them to their new clubs for draft picks in the 80s so that they could in fact start training at their new clubs earlier and not have to wait for the draft period to end.

We didn't push them out the door (his words) like you did Vince for pick 23(?) because you were penalised for draft tampering.
 
manboob said:
Not at all. Chapman was offered a contract extension. Podsiadly was under performing 32 year old whose contract was over.
Both players had opportunities to stay at the Cats in various capacities and chose to exercise their option to go elsewhere.
When it became evident they wanted to pursue opportunities elsewhere we did the classy thing and traded them to their new clubs for draft picks in the 80s so that they could in fact start training at their new clubs earlier and not have to wait for the draft period to end.

We didn't push them out the door (his words) like you did Vince for pick 23(?) because you were penalised for draft tampering.
Click to expand...
Well actually Vince wouldn't have got a contract extension beyond 2015 for us and Melbourne offered him a larger and better deal so it was a win win for all parties. Didn't you offer Chapman a 10+ game contract for 2014?
 
Bailey01 said:
Well actually Vince wouldn't have got a contract extension beyond 2015 for us and Melbourne offered him a larger and better deal so it was a win win for all parties. Didn't you offer Chapman a 10+ game contract for 2014?
Click to expand...
Nah that's bullshit. You can't offer a bloke a contract based on games. At best it would have been a reduction in wages
 
manboob said:
Not at all. Chapman was offered a contract extension. Podsiadly was under performing 32 year old whose contract was over.
Both players had opportunities to stay at the Cats in various capacities and chose to exercise their option to go elsewhere.
When it became evident they wanted to pursue opportunities elsewhere we did the classy thing and traded them to their new clubs for draft picks in the 80s so that they could in fact start training at their new clubs earlier and not have to wait for the draft period to
We didn't push them out the door (his words) like you did Vince for pick 23(?) because you were penalised for draft tampering.
Click to expand...

It's called list management. When the swans do it it's ok but if the crows offload someone it's pushing them out the door? Idiot
 
I think we can put this little tea party to bed now that Danger, Tex and Sloane have gone into the pub business with our new director and chairman in waiting Roo. Danger will be in the AFC tricolours wearing the mighty 32 till he retires :thumbsu:
 
mattymac said:
I think we can put this little tea party to bed now that Danger, Tex and Sloane have gone into the pub business with our new director and chairman in waiting Roo. Danger will be in the AFC tricolours wearing the mighty 32 till he retires :thumbsu:
Click to expand...
You're going to look so silly if he walks haha.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Slats
  • Locked
Scandal Alastair Clarkson takes indefinite leave
Replies
3
Views
2K
Madas
Madas
M
Rumour Simon Goodwin resigning today?
2 3 4 5
Replies
101
Views
13K
stinga82
S
T
Rumour AFL to buy / take control of regional AFL venue.
3 4 5 6 7
Replies
163
Views
9K
Bluez Rule
Bluez Rule
Slats
Scandal The AFL is aware of footage which shows Tom Hawkins looking at a phone during the rain break
2 3
Replies
51
Views
3K
SuperMal
SuperMal
LordLucifer
Ex-AFL agent Nixon too broke to pay assault case lawyer
2 3
Replies
74
Views
14K
FuManchu
FuManchu
Dazb86
Rumour Dodoro to Port Adelaide?
2
Replies
25
Views
4K
Outtatym
O
GC2015
Rumour Treloar considering a move to the Suns (again)
2
Replies
28
Views
8K
KERRPOW
KERRPOW

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top