- Mar 28, 2010
- 5,342
- 6,038
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Other Teams
- Miami HEAT
Thanks Dubs, you've done a beautiful service.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Absolutely more so. This was there to win for the Celtics. There is nothing the Warriors did that was unbeatable.I don't think I've ever seen such a dumb team make it this far. Offensively, defensively, doesn't matter... just so many poor decisions, so many lazy plays. Celts have lost this series as much as the Dubs have won it, maybe even more so.
Eh? The Warriors could have also won it in 5 if they didn’t choke game 1.Absolutely more so. This was there to win for the Celtics. There is nothing the Warriors did that was unbeatable.
Celtics simply choked. This is going to hurt Tatum for a long time.
That depends a lot on where you rated him before it I guess, this Warriors team is far from a great one.The talk about Curry's LeGaCy is going to be nauseating next week.
This doesnt move Curry much imo, he's the same guy he has always been. Steve Kerr as a coach is probably the big winner of this season's run imo.
If Tatum, Brown and Smart as good as everyone says they are, and add Horford, they should have been much more competitive than that.Eh? The Warriors could have also won it in 5 if they didn’t choke game 1.
Celtics also could have very easily lost the last 2 rounds.
The turnovers issue wasn’t them choking it is a legit major weakness that the entire league had known about for a long time, pressure them crossing hog court and wait for a mistake.
The Celtics just have more weaknesses. The Warriors are no where near as good of a team as they were in the past, but they are so good at covering those cracks.
Maybe people were overrating the Celtics? Smart is a great defender and improved on the offensive end, but has never been a true point guard.If Tatum, Brown and Smart as good as everyone says they are, and add Horford, they should have been much more competitive than that.
Truth is they were miles off.
Warriors were great, but the Celtics were horrible.
I called when the Celtics were 2-1 up that the Warriors were overmatched. And they were - the Celtics are bigger, they defend better, they were dominating the boards, they are younger, but on offence they disappeared. No one wanted it.
It is a fact Boston should have been much more competitive than they were. Boston didn't just lose 4 times, they got torched four times.
And most of those times the Warriors were playing a team of relative short people.
But hey, * the Celtics
Maybe people were overrating the Celtics? Smart is a great defender and improved on the offensive end, but has never been a true point guard.
Horford over performed if anything, he is capable of going off but he can’t maintain it at his age.
Guys like Pritchard have them some good minutes at times, but is unplayable in certain situations.
Realistically I think they were lucky to get past the Bucks
Horford gave me a ******* fright tonight though to be fairGame 1 they got 15 threes from Horford, Smart and Derrick White.
That will never happen in another NBA game.