Education & Reference Why Americanizations Are Correct

Remove this Banner Ad

Sep 6, 2005
145,114
94,964
AFL Club
Fremantle
I often get people questioning or making fun of it, but I always have good examples to prove why it's the correct way. So let's see how many opinions/beliefs I can convert online.

I have hundreds of examples/ways of explaining why, but for brevity will mention just a few.



American Time
3/31/2014 or the more formal 2014/3/31

It's the correct way because when someone stops you on the street and asks what time it is, you do not say, "it's 45 (seconds) and 23 (minutes) past 8 (hours)." Maybe some do say, "it's 23 past 8." But more correctly, people say "it's 8:23."

As in, no matter the real world method of organizing columns and lists, you always hold the slower moving number first, and go down from there. So YEAR then MONTH then DAY is the proper way. Colloquially, that is MONTH then DAY.

Plenty of other real world examples involving time. Like stop-watch result: 4:24 (4 seconds, 24 hundredths of a second.) Not the smaller, faster moving number first, then the larger one.

When you write lists and point forms in spreadsheets etc, you organize them as...

1.01
1.02
1.03
etc

You always hold the slower/bigger number first, and the smaller/faster moving numbers come after.

Plenty of examples out there.



American Words
It's motor, not motour. Etc with many other words in the British/Australian English that still use "or" instead of "our." These French remnants are actually worse than Americanizations to hold onto. Should be color, armor, odor, etc.

Center is another example. Centre would be pronounced "sahn-tre" when in English it should be pronounced "sen-ter."
 
The date thing makes sense in terms of ordering. Say you're in an office and need to look up some hard copy report. You pick up the 2013 binder, immediately find July, and then its only a short lookup for the 4th.

But understandably, it would drive most non-Americans nuts when they see it like that - MM/DD/YYYY
 
The date thing makes sense in terms of ordering. Say you're in an office and need to look up some hard copy report. You pick up the 2013 binder, immediately find July, and then its only a short lookup for the 4th.

But understandably, it would drive most non-Americans nuts when they see it like that - MM/DD/YYYY

Another excellent example. Ordering things are done that way in all the world, except when it comes to brits/aussies with the date format. Which is actually the exception.

Just people used to the date format done that way is why it drives them 'nuts', but people can be re-trained quickly imo.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

When people date documents on a computer it is exceptionally frustrating when they date them DDMMYYYY

Should always be YYYYMMDD so e.g. 20140413 - Letter to ASIC

When you've written a letter that you can't find through search (cause you can't remember what you called it) what's going to be the most likely thing you'll remember
- the year and approximate month you wrote it
- the day of the month you wrote out
- the first letter of the filename you saved it
 
So you argue that dates should be in order of size, yet you think the American way (which isn't in order of size) is better than ours (which is in order of size).

And why no mention of the imperial system? Is it because it's inferior to the metric system?
 
The way Americans write dates is annoying.

It's like they have to be different to everyone else on purpose, driving on the right hand side of the road, using miles instead of kilometres, gallons instead of litres, fahrenheit instead of celcius, baseball instead of cricket...the list goes on.
 
Re the date, you've just made it sound like the Americans ****ed it up more

Naturally if you don't go biggest to smallest (2014/6/24) then you go smallest to largest (24/6/2014), but the Americans to middle to smallest to largest

Pick a side fools
 
Re the date, you've just made it sound like the Americans ****** it up more

Naturally if you don't go biggest to smallest (2014/6/24) then you go smallest to largest (24/6/2014), but the Americans to middle to smallest to largest

Pick a side fools
It is actually largest to smallest.
It's just colloquially done m/d/y because people dont go around quoting the year in everyday use.
So it's colloquially done m/d
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

So Metric > Imperial?

Thanks.
Obviously. The point of anything is to be truthful. To isolate and celebrate those things which are done correctly or most sensibly. There are a few nations around the world who still use Imperial as an official standard, but for all intents and purposes use Metric still as it's created to be an International Standard.

In the same vein, English should attain an International Standard (phonetic spelling, discarding the etymology of words).

Likewise, driving on the right side of the road, and using the yyyy/mm/dd proper date formating, should be standardized.

Etc.

Vive le difference....to an extent we must also celebrate differences, not homogenize everything. But when it comes to English language I do agree with creating a singular International Standard like "metric".
 
Most of the world does it.

Yeah it's only the UK, Australia, NZ, Southern Africa, India and parts of Asia that drive on the left but I think the main reason they drive on the right in America is be different to England. I've heard they deliberately tried to be different to England after they gained independence with the American Revolution, hence why they developed their own sports rather than playing cricket, rugby and soccer.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top