Changes for GWS

[GarnerSmash]

You're trippin, right?

Nope.

 

[CaptainJackZiebell]

Outs - Delaney, Harper and Campbell
ins- Kennedy, Greenwood and Wells (as sub)

Kennedy because we have to play him sooner or later
Greenwood because his good VFL form shouldn't go unrewarded
Wells because I want him to be cherry ripe for the first final and would love to just ease him back into the top flight with a severely reduced workload.

 

[kool kangas]

Brad has said that this week would be a good time to play 'A Fringe player' , meaning 1.... So l'm thinking IN: Wells, Seira, OUT: Harper, Campbell.

 

[Long Live the King]

No massive changes. We need a settled side heading into finals. I like the idea of Greenwood getting a run. A tagger will come in handy in finals.

 

[ArjenTheGreat]

Out: Harper, Atley (both rested)
In: Greenwood, Mullet

 

[roos_fanatic08]

I personally hope Sierakowski doesn't play, he offers way less than Greenwood, Kennedy, Mullet, Delaney ect.

 

[Flawed Genius]

http://www.kangaroos.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/4912/newsid/146100/default.aspx

 

[Glory Days]

"We're not in a position where we can look at resting players."

i.e. we need to smash GWS to secure a home final.

 

[Kimbo]

i.e. we need to smash GWS to secure a home final.

And to ensure we're playing at our best to win a final.

 

[Jay-Z]

Spoke to Brad at a club function today and he hinted that Wellsy would be the only in this week. He has said that after he mentioned he was considering resting players and giving a few of the VFL guys a go he had a stream of players who were in the team, come into his office during the week and say "I don't need a rest" haha. It's a good problem to have. Especially at this time of year.

 

[Hard_to_Beat]

"minimal changes this week"



They could lose 8 straight by 20 goals and he would still look after his favorites.

 

[Jay-Z]

"minimal changes this week"



They could lose 8 straight by 20 goals and he would still look after his favorites.

Please. It's called playing the best 22

 

[Benno_900]

"minimal changes this week"



They could lose 8 straight by 20 goals and he would still look after his favorites.

We've won 9 of 11, wtf do you expect?

 

[Daz]

Yeah but Tef, if we were playing your favourites we'd have a team of Ben Warrens.

 

[Hard_to_Beat]

We've won 9 of 11, wtf do you expect?

We're still carrying blokes.

 

[shinboner spiggs]

We're still carrying blokes.

who would you say is being carried?

 

[Benno_900]

We're still carrying blokes.

Okay, name them.

 

[Daz]

Harps is being carried. JMac has been but was good last week.

 

[Benno_900]

Who do we have in the VFL that can play the Harps role?

Campbell is being carried because he can be an effective sub. I'm not fussed if he's dropped.

 

[year of the roo]

We're still carrying blokes.

Bloody DT/SC'ers

 

[Hard_to_Beat]

who would you say is being carried?

I would be bringing in Pederson and Greenwood and dropping Harper and Campbell.

 

[skittler]

Replacing Campbell or Harper with Pederson doesn't really help the structure of the side at all.

 

[GarnerSmash]

Pedo has a dodgy ankle, no?

 

[shinboner spiggs]

I would be bringing in Pederson and Greenwood and dropping Harper and Campbell.

na, i dont think you can drop two impact players for another tall and an insider. like for like, id be resting harps for speight (like for a like) and thats it

 

[Hard_to_Beat]

na, i dont think you can drop two impact players for another tall and an insider. like for like, id be resting harps for speight (like for a like) and thats it

We're going to need all the mature bodies we can muster for the finals.

Pederson has more flexibility and will have just as much or more impact than Harps.

Then the coach was waffling on about the players not winning the contested ball v Freo, well...........play *****ing Levi.