Yes we can, and its not like he doesn't sook it up now!!If he requests a trade we can't keep him, you don't want disgruntled players in the playing group during the season. Hopefully it doesn't come to that though.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Yes we can, and its not like he doesn't sook it up now!!If he requests a trade we can't keep him, you don't want disgruntled players in the playing group during the season. Hopefully it doesn't come to that though.
I can see a little light there it might just beYou keep talking about our "window" Magic but unfortunately, this is the only window I see....
View attachment 133878

6 or 7 years is long enough me thinks.Have we not learnt, never trade talls until they have had every chance to make it..
Astbury, vickers, Elton are all required....
Keep drafting kids, take some risks at the draft, unlike the safe vanilla options in the past
Recruit big bodies and big mids, recruit some speed, play more direct

Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Really well you think if he stayed he would be as good? Besides he cost the club sponsorship money as well as been a dud for us.Sometimes a good kick in the backside can bring out the best of you so it might have worked for him. Any other talls we got rid of recently that have excelled?How is Schultz going?
And that was from his own mouth the kick in the backside.How is Schultz going?

I can't think of many White for the woods but he isn't any better than he was a swans i think he's even worse. Daws for melb not much better than he was at woods, If you are talking about talls that moved on cause of the $ signs eg Franklin i think they don't countYou just don't trade talls, you persist and persist and keep them in the 2's until you are sure they are duds then you delist them... How many other tall trades are doing well?
I can't think of many White for the woods but he isn't any better than he was a swans i think he's even worse. Daws for melb not much better than he was at woods, If you are talking about talls that moved on cause of the $ signs eg Franklin i think they don't count
True that, probably that's why the coach talk now days and last couple of year's, play the f kin kids doesn't matter if we lose not that we are doing much better without them.Agree, that's why I don't think you trade talls, any that are decent are too valuable and they just take so long to click that you need a lot of patience... An average tall today in 2 years with a better side could be the difference?
They are like pine cones, plant them and forget them and hope that one day they grow into amazing pine trees, but you need time and patience.
Look at Rance, once an absolute spud now AA, vickers has talent but is currently a spud, elton has talent as does mcbean,
Agree, that's why I don't think you trade talls, any that are decent are too valuable and they just take so long to click that you need a lot of patience... An average tall today in 2 years with a better side could be the difference?
They are like pine cones, plant them and forget them and hope that one day they grow into amazing pine trees, but you need time and patience.
Look at Rance, once an absolute spud now AA, vickers has talent but is currently a spud, elton has talent as does mcbean,
Yes we can, and its not like he doesn't sook it up now!!
We all know the saints will get him over us just because richmond dont have the balls to offer what is required to get so.eo e of his caliberAgree that he would be a monumental upgrade in our best 22 as this wouldn't require much
However if he cannot get a game in a top four side under one of the best coaches then alarm bells start to ring as he may improve us , but yet again not enough to he competitive
Grigg pets Hunt Chaplin Thomas Morris so on so on are all players in this mould . They took us to 8th and that's it
I'm in for absolute A graders only bc I'm over battlers as its dragged on for too long
Saints are after Sloane I hear. If we get beaten to the line by them then I suspect the war chest is loaded up Monopoly money
Blair can forget about sloane looks like saints has the upper hand and he followed them as a kid![]()
Hardwick: he is an exciting prospect, we think he will be a valuable player for us.we wont get shiel
might have to settle for quality like d.ellard or armfield
You just know they'll play every game bar injury or suspensionswe wont get shiel
might have to settle for quality like d.ellard or armfield
But didnt he have a picture of Del on his wall?
We all know the saints will get him over us just because richmond dont have the balls to offer what is required to get so.eo e of his caliber

Sloane would want 800KWe all know the saints will get him over us just because richmond dont have the balls to offer what is required to get so.eo e of his caliber
Id take him if we could get him. We need as much quality as possibleFair enough to because Sloane is not nearly worth what you think he is to us. Good luck to the Saints if they get Sloane but frankly for RFC Shiel will be a far more important player for us!![]()