Agreed. Their KPD depth is nonexistent.I'm sure Griff will be enough to get the deal over the line. They are running short on key position talent.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Agreed. Their KPD depth is nonexistent.I'm sure Griff will be enough to get the deal over the line. They are running short on key position talent.
Calm down mate.
I'm posting respectfully, the thread isn't labelled Richmond posters only.
My post's have been quoted by civil Richmond supporters and I've replied..
Why are you so precious about this?
And if i had of written what you've written about my post I would be carded..
Welcome to North Korea!
Sorry, I'm not quite up to speed but why would he have chosen you guys if the money was the same as Collingwood's offer. Is this confirmed by guys on here with good sources?Our money offer won't change.
We won't change our pay structure for anyone. Apart from
Im sure if we offered just as much $$$ as Collingwood we wouldn't be having this argument as he would have nominated us.
Depth can be obtained through FA though.We need depth. 3 for 1 offers are not something we should be entertaining.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
They need a fwd that can play ruck. Doubt they want Griff though.
Of course it's speculation, you said it yourself, the only thing we know as fact is that AT has nominated you guys.You honestly and with a straight face interpreted that as speculation?
Ok, I guess. In the end, it doesn't ultimately matter.
Happy for blokes like yourself to stick around and discuss logically. The other Pies fans can GAGF thoughCalm down mate.
I'm posting respectfully, the thread isn't labelled Richmond posters only.
My post's have been quoted by civil Richmond supporters and I've replied..
Why are you so precious about this?
They need a fwd that can play ruck. Doubt they want Griff though.
Yes I would. For the exact reason I doubt they'd want him. He's a tease. All the talent in the world but can't put it together.Fair Call..
Would you be happy letting Griff go?
Seemed to be starting to put some decent games together this year.
Unlucky he got injured..
Would have thought he was well embedded in your best 22 for 2016.
Fair Call..
Would you be happy letting Griff go?
Seemed to be starting to put some decent games together this year.
Unlucky he got injured..
Would have thought he was well embedded in your best 22 for 2016.
24 years old next season..
Break out year contender?
So if thats the case why is Collingwoods offer to Treloar more than anyone else's.Sorry, I'm not quite up to speed but why would he have chosen you guys if the money was the same as Collingwood's offer. Is this confirmed by guys on here with good sources?
Our midfield doesn't need depth as much as it needs an out and out gun inside mid. We literally only have Cotchin and Miles who are are elite in this role, and only really Miles who has been effective because the opposition mauls Cotchin because they know how bare our engine room is for quality clearance playersWe need depth. 3 for 1 offers are not something we should be entertaining.
Great post, heck off!!Why is our board full of Collingwood supporters all of a sudden? **** off
Of course it's speculation, you said it yourself, the only thing we know as fact is that AT has nominated you guys.
Fair enough man, I'd still make an argument that you could still see it as speculation but who really cares, you seem to have a similar view on the whole thing as most of us anyway.Speculation - "In the end, I reckon Treloar probably wanted to go to Richmond if given the choice, but Collingwood maybe just offered more money than we could"
(Apparent) Fact - "In the end, Treloar wanted to come to Richmond but at the last minute changed his mind because reasons"
As I'm reading my post, I realise I'm getting into semantics, but given the response to my initial post was exactly about that, I'd be remiss in not pointing this out.
I wasn't suggesting we haven't offered more, I was asking if it had been confirmed on here that he would have chosen the Tigers if money wasnt the key factor.So if thats the case why is Collingwoods offer to Treloar more than anyone else's.
If Pies are such a destination club than by rights your offer should be $100k less than anyone else and he would still nominate the Pies.
Get your head out of your ass. Surely even the most ignorant Pies supporter knows you are obtaining players over the last few years because Fat Eddy has offered up more money than anyone else.
How do you know we aren't into Redden?Why are you guys into Yarran, Bennell and Stevy J? You guys lost the contested possession by 33 on the weekend and those 3 players don't even know what a contested possession is. You should go hard at Jack Redden, Contested possession/tackling/clearance beast. Would fit the Tigers well I would have thought.
We are interested in ReddenWhy are you guys into Yarran, Bennell and Stevy J? You guys lost the contested possession by 33 on the weekend and those 3 players don't even know what a contested possession is. You should go hard at Jack Redden, Contested possession/tackling/clearance beast. Would fit the Tigers well I would have thought.
Cameron
Patton
Stewart
Tomlinson
Finlayson
Even with McCarthy wanting out.. if they refuse to trade him then throw McCarthy in the top 3 fwds for them.
They have plenty.
For **** sake I don't mind some pies posters but can we keep this thread for discussing Richmond? Use the treloar thread on the other board.
How do you know we aren't into Redden?
Looks at which board we're on.... Oh yes, Richmond, not Collingwood. Poo hole? Really?Blow it out your poo hole - this is "Trade and Free Agency Discussion" - Treloar is very much a part of that and how he relates to Richmond - Treloar news is the prime reason I come here.