Traded James Aish [traded to Collingwood for #26 and St Kilda's 2016 second round pick]

[Apex36]

Unless we have a player we've targeted, I think we'd rather just draft picks. Collingwood's second rounder and another pick later in the second round would probably add up to a decent pick equivalent.

AFAIK the "linking" to Seedsman have basically just been echo chambering - starting as "Seedsman might be on the table" through "Pies wouldn't be against trading Pies" to "Lions are interested in Seedsman", similar to the Witts linkage to GWS.

I'm not sure if you're joking there. The Lions and GWS have both expressed an interest in Seed and Witts. It's not just Big Footy scuttlebutt.

 

[theteamtobeat]

I'm not sure if you're joking there. The Lions and GWS have both expressed an interest in Seed and Witts. It's not just Big Footy scuttlebutt.

No chance we are going to get Witts. If you guys offload him then Collingwood will get Kreuzer, hence Carlton band 1 compo. Bye bye Schache. That's not going to happen.

 

[Apex36]

No chance we are going to get Witts. If you guys offload him then Collingwood will get Kreuzer, hence Carlton band 1 compo. Bye bye Schache. That's not going to happen.

I think you misunderstood my post. You guys have expressed an interest in Seedsman, GWS in Witts. Witts has refused to be traded though so we'll have to find another way to satisfy them in the Treloar trade.

 

[theteamtobeat]

What will Brisbane want for Aish?
Oxley and 26 do the job?

A potential delistee and pick 26 (likely be pick 27-30 after Academy bidding) in a weak draft, no thanks.

The club will try to trade Aish + Pick 55 for Pick 27-30 (Collingwood) + Pick 25-27 (St Kilda - Nathan Freeman) or 2016 second round pick + Paul Seedsmans.

Pick 27-30 goes to Hawthorn for Suckling and and 25-27 goes to Carlton for Tom Bell.

Brisbane:
Tom Bell
Matthew Suckling
Paul Seedsman

Collingwood:
James Aish
Pick 55

 

[theteamtobeat]

I think you misunderstood my post. You guys have expressed an interest in Seedsman, GWS in Witts. Witts has refused to be traded though so we'll have to find another way to satisfy them in the Treloar trade.

Okay, soz.

 

[Apex36]

A potential delistee and pick 26 (likely be pick 27-30 after Academy bidding) in a weak draft, no thanks.

The club will try to trade Aish + Pick 55 for Pick 27-30 (Collingwood) + Pick 25-27 (St Kilda - Nathan Freeman) or 2016 second round pick + Paul Seedsmans.

Pick 27-30 goes to Hawthorn for Suckling and and 25-27 goes to Carlton for Tom Bell.

Brisbane:
Tom Bell
Matthew Suckling
Paul Seedsman

Collingwood:
James Aish
Pick 55

Oxley played 17 games this year. He's not even close to being delisted. Where are people getting this idea about him from?

 

[PhiloBeddoe]

A potential delistee and pick 26 (likely be pick 27-30 after Academy bidding) in a weak draft, no thanks.

The club will try to trade Aish + Pick 55 for Pick 27-30 (Collingwood) + Pick 25-27 (St Kilda - Nathan Freeman) or 2016 second round pick + Paul Seedsmans.

Pick 27-30 goes to Hawthorn for Suckling and and 25-27 goes to Carlton for Tom Bell.

Brisbane:
Tom Bell
Matthew Suckling
Paul Seedsman

Collingwood:
James Aish
Pick 55

Oxley is not a potential delistee at all.

 

[TradeDraft]

IF Aish choose's Collingwood you think the Picks we would get for Seedsman and Freeman would be put together in a Trade for Aish

 

[Vindicater]

Aish will end up back in Adelaide I reckon. Will use the pieces they get from Dangerfield to make it happen.

 

[PAFCsince1870]

A potential delistee..

Stopped reading here.

You can't expect people to take you seriously when you say things like this.

 

[dlanod]

Oxley played 17 games this year. He's not even close to being delisted. Where are people getting this idea about him from?

I think people are getting Oxley and Dwyer confused. That's the only explanation that I can figure out.

 

[TradeDraft]

Aish will end up back in Adelaide I reckon. Will use the pieces they get from Dangerfield to make it happen.

We will get more Idea this Week

 

[askdotcom]

A potential delistee and pick 26 (likely be pick 27-30 after Academy bidding) in a weak draft, no thanks.

The club will try to trade Aish + Pick 55 for Pick 27-30 (Collingwood) + Pick 25-27 (St Kilda - Nathan Freeman) or 2016 second round pick + Paul Seedsmans.

Pick 27-30 goes to Hawthorn for Suckling and and 25-27 goes to Carlton for Tom Bell.

Brisbane:
Tom Bell
Matthew Suckling
Paul Seedsman

Collingwood:
James Aish
Pick 55

your losing it.

 

[BRAB]

I got much better impressions from Oxley given his SuperCoach season but I suppose that didn't reflect how he played in reality?

I thought Oxley was much better then he's said to be

 

[DAWESOME!!]

I got much better impressions from Oxley given his SuperCoach season but I suppose that didn't reflect how he played in reality?

I thought Oxley was much better then he's said to be

He is a player we would certainly want to keep but he is from Queensland and we're looking for trade items a Queensland club might want. That's the only reason we throw up his name.

 

[Apex36]

I got much better impressions from Oxley given his SuperCoach season but I suppose that didn't reflect how he played in reality?

I thought Oxley was much better then he's said to be

Consistency has been his major issue, which is to be expected given its in reality his first season on the senior list. He's had some ripping games and some stinkers. Needs to learn to handle attention from defensive forwards a bit more, but excels as a loose man in defence.

 

[BRAB]

He is a player we would certainly want to keep but he is from Queensland and we're looking for trade items a Queensland club might want. That's the only reason we throw up his name.

Consistency has been his major issue, which is to be expected given its in reality his first season on the senior list. He's had some ripping games and some stinkers. Needs to learn to handle attention from defensive forwards a bit more, but excels as a loose man in defence.

Cheers fellas.

Oxley is more palatable then seedsman in my opinion.

Would still rather 2 draft picks purely for draft reasons.

 

[Men of Steele]

A potential delistee and pick 26 (likely be pick 27-30 after Academy bidding) in a weak draft, no thanks.

The club will try to trade Aish + Pick 55 for Pick 27-30 (Collingwood) + Pick 25-27 (St Kilda - Nathan Freeman) or 2016 second round pick + Paul Seedsmans.

Pick 27-30 goes to Hawthorn for Suckling and and 25-27 goes to Carlton for Tom Bell.

Brisbane:
Tom Bell
Matthew Suckling
Paul Seedsman

Collingwood:
James Aish
Pick 55

Suckling is a free agent, he won't cost you anything but the money in your pocket

 

[blueiris]

Suckling is a free agent, he won't cost you anything but the money in your pocket

Would cost us a decent compo pick for Leuenberger though

 

[Austin_McCrabbs]

A potential delistee and pick 26 (likely be pick 27-30 after Academy bidding) in a weak draft, no thanks.

The club will try to trade Aish + Pick 55 for Pick 27-30 (Collingwood) + Pick 25-27 (St Kilda - Nathan Freeman) or 2016 second round pick + Paul Seedsmans.

Pick 27-30 goes to Hawthorn for Suckling and and 25-27 goes to Carlton for Tom Bell.

Brisbane:
Tom Bell
Matthew Suckling
Paul Seedsman

Collingwood:
James Aish
Pick 55

Oh dear...

 

[cdcanman]

Would cost us a decent compo pick for Leuenberger though

The reality people often overlook.
If they want a player like Suckling (or another free agent) they might be better off trading for them.
It would certainly be an option that Hawthorn would prefer. Return an asset via trade rather than lose Suckling for nothing.
They may choose to resign him rather than see him walk for no return.

 

[Schraderbrau]

It must be really difficult, from an organisational perspective, for a power club like Collingwood when all these talented young guns want to play for them.

 

[rusty08]

It must be really difficult, from an organisational perspective, for a power club like Collingwood when all these talented young guns want to play for them.

Get your hand off it

 

[Apex36]

Get your hand off it

Here fishy fishy...

 

[Dom PC]

It must be really difficult, from an organisational perspective, for a power club like Collingwood when all these talented young guns want to play for them.

Well... this is awkward.