Remove this Banner Ad

Player Watch Nathan Freeman

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Have more respect for Freeman than Schranberg.

One wasn't even offered 250/300K the other agreed to stay only when he got 400K+.
He's not on 400k, and likely won't make that kind of coin until year 3 of his contract.
 
Good to see you guys are taking the news well. You definitely didn't offer Wellingham and pick 30 for Ball either. I think with Seedsman gone, Shenton will be a real quality pick up for you guys!!
You're right we gave St Kilda a choice between Wellingham + 30 or Goldsack + 30


From memory

St Kilda - Nathan Brown + 30
Collingwood - no
Collingwood - Goldsack or Wellingham + 30
St Kilda - no
St Kilda - pick in top 25, no player
Collingwood - ok, organise deal to send Wellingham + 30 to North for 25
St Kilda - no, if you're dealing with North we want 21
North - no, deal was for 25
 
Reports in the media, try not to fall off your pony.
Ah I didn't realise you had access to the Library of Alexandria that is the Australian Rules Football media.

I now see that Scharenberg is a tyrannical overlord out to destroy our salary cap rather than a loyal player who has resigned for three more years, as is the impression I got from the unreliable Scott Pendlebury's instagram account.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

I wished we picked someone else at 10 also if Kruezer didn't pass a medical how did freeman

Huh? When? When he was drafted? He had zero history of injury, why would we test him?

Ah I didn't realise you had access to the Library of Alexandria that is the Australian Rules Football media.

I now see that Scharenberg is a tyrannical overlord out to destroy our salary cap rather than a loyal player who has resigned for three more years, as is the impression I got from the unreliable Scott Pendlebury's instagram account.

Calm down.
 
Huh? When? When he was drafted? He had zero history of injury, why would we test him?



Calm down.
He means how did Freeman pass a medical at St Kilda.
 
And what exactly are we using for treloar?
We use pick 5 and a second rounder?

Should suit GWS to a tee really with their academies. That way it won't cost us 2 first rounders either.
 
He's not on 400k, and likely won't make that kind of coin until year 3 of his contract.
I don't know what he's on and neither do you, all we know is that his manager was asking for 350-400K.

And the first mention of possible Freeman's departure stated aints have offered him 250K and we aren't prepared to match it.

I understand the supporters being parochial cause that's what we do but these are the facts and based on them it's highly hypocritical to cane Freeman while ignoring the fact Scharenberg did exactly the same, only difference being he demanded even more coin.
And while there might be a slight gap in the talent stakes their circumstances, 2 years on our list for stuff all return, are just about identical.
 
I don't know what he's on and neither do you, all we know is that his manager was asking for 350-400K.

And the first mention of possible Freeman's departure stated aints have offered him 250K and we aren't prepared to match it.

I understand the supporters being parochial cause that's what we do but these are the facts and based on them it's highly hypocritical to cane Freeman while ignoring the fact Scharenberg did exactly the same, only difference being he demanded more coin.
And while there might be a slight gap in the talent stakes their circumstances, 2 years on our list for stuff all return, are just about identical.
Scharenberg is fit to play, Freeman is not.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Scharenberg over came two career threatening injuries to play majority of this year in the VFL and even stretched 4 AFL games together.

Freeman hasn't been able to get a hamstring right, which is generally a 4-8 week injury. Just think about that for a second and try and work out the differences as to why we may of been offering one more money than the other.
I understand all that and that's why Freeman was asking for substantially less but we still wouldn't barge.
Your turn to understand.
 
Genuine question: with the academy thing does it make a difference to GWS whether it is pick 5 or 7?
Pick 5 is worth more points than pick 7, but whether the difference in points helps GWS won't be known until academy bidding.
 
I don't know what he's on and neither do you, all we know is that his manager was asking for 350-400K.

And the first mention of possible Freeman's departure stated aints have offered him 250K and we aren't prepared to match it.

I understand the supporters being parochial cause that's what we do but these are the facts and based on them it's highly hypocritical to cane Freeman while ignoring the fact Scharenberg did exactly the same, only difference being he demanded even more coin.
And while there might be a slight gap in the talent stakes their circumstances, 2 years on our list for stuff all return, are just about identical.
I understand what you mean, and almost agree but they aren't facts.

The figures are all speculation and we don't know what Scharenberg signed for nor do we know what Freeman was offered. I suspect Freeman leaving has more to do with his mismanagement of injury or competition for spots rather than the amount we offered.
 
I have no issue with A) Freeman wanting the move as its ridiculous coin to turn down and B) The club not over paying for a kid who is injury prone and not played a single min in the AFL.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

We use pick 5 and a second rounder?

Should suit GWS to a tee really with their academies. That way it won't cost us 2 first rounders either.
If reports are correct, GWS and collingwood are almost satisfied with a deal already. No need to muddy the waters
 
I don't know what he's on and neither do you, all we know is that his manager was asking for 350-400K.

And the first mention of possible Freeman's departure stated aints have offered him 250K and we aren't prepared to match it.

I understand the supporters being parochial cause that's what we do but these are the facts and based on them it's highly hypocritical to cane Freeman while ignoring the fact Scharenberg did exactly the same, only difference being he demanded even more coin.
And while there might be a slight gap in the talent stakes their circumstances, 2 years on our list for stuff all return, are just about identical.

Let me get this right now.......

Freeman LEFT for money???

and Scharenberg STAYED for money???
 
You were doing well until you referenced the 'media'.
Well we don't have anything else to go on by as for some reason the Club didn't announce the monetary worth of Scharenberg's contract.

And in any case people are rubbishing Freeman based on none other than the media reports....
 
I am not happy seeing Freeman leave, because Hine rarely fails with top 10 picks and I would have loved to see what he could do for us long term.

As ordinary as this news is, we just need to try and get the best deal we can.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom