I don't know if you heard but i was up to over 1000
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

I don't know if you heard but i was up to over 1000
But there is no direct evidence after the trade. If anything, the post-trade evidence points towards a lower valuation.You can not change that.
You can not use the AFL market as direct evidence to support your arguement prior to the trade and then ignore that same direct evidence after the trade.
They have to remain the same as that is market evidence by those who do this job.
Would the social media person know the trade strategies?The AFC tweet is interesting. Trading Mackay? Bringing in another player?
*Hope this isn't seen as bullying Mackay
The AFC tweet is interesting. Trading Mackay? Bringing in another player?
*Hope this isn't seen as bullying Mackay
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
lol wotNo to aish from me aswell......poor character.
They've teased us about upcoming announcements before.Would the social media person know the trade strategies?
Hes given brisbane nothing now wants out to the club of his choice.....spoilt brat.lol wot
I can't change the value that he was assigned 3 years ago, but it's patently absurd to state that a player's value doesn't change from the day that they are drafted. If that were the case then Nat Fyfe's value would still be #20, when he's currently the #1 player in the AFL. Menzel's value was pick #11 in 2012, in 2015 it's considerably less than that.
Actually, I like your banking comparison. If I bought US$200 3 years ago, I would have paid around $190 (give or take), as the Australian dollar was briefly above parity with the US dollar. If I bought US$200 today, I would have to pay around $290, because the Australian dollar is now only worth around 70c US. The Australian dollar has fallen from around 108c to 70c when compared to the US dollar. The same thing has happened with Menzel's value - he's depreciated, having not lived up to the expectations of a #11 draftee.
Players' trade values don't remain constant. A new draftee might, arguably, hold their original value for 1-2 years. After that their valuation becomes increasingly based on their actual performance, and less on the potential they showed as a junior. Some players will rise in value, because they perform better than their original draft position indicated (eg. Nat Fyfe). Some players will fall in value, because they fail to perform to the level expected of them. Menzel falls into the latter category.
How can I state that with confidence? Because it makes a damn sight more sense than your ludicrous suggestion that he has maintained his 2012 valuation, despite having performed poorly in the interval. How can you justify your argument that his value hasn't decreased in the intervening 3 years?
Player doesn't choose Crows = poor character.lol wot
Just haven't seen him around lately, and we all know Grotto is not one to just browse
Carlton are desperate.. Really desperate. The fact that they've offered Kerridge a 3-year contract shows just how desperate they are.The value of a product is what someone is willing to pay for it, doesn't matter their circumstances.
Roughly I see it like,
5 year contract, big money = top 5 pick
5 year contract, average money = top 10 pick
4 year contract = top 20 pick
3 year contract = top 30 pick
Menzel and carlton was amicable. If carlton wanted him he would of stayed.....aish is not comparable. Hes screwed the lions overPlayer doesn't choose Crows = poor character.
I don't like the sound of Menzel's personality but, he's good at football so I don't care so much.
Yep, and Menzel is worth 3629 points, and draft pick -2Carlton traded pick 28 (677) for Plowman (pick 3 - 2234pts), Sumner (pick 10 -1395) & other lesser drafted players.
Does that mean Kedge is worth 2952, or almost Pick 1?
Or are points irrelevant?
Wouldn't work. Pick 71 is worthless, and Pick 13 - Pick 17 = Pick 57. Aish is worth more than Pick 57
Collingwood are offering two second round picks: Pick 28 and a future pick (~30, let's say). That's equivalent to Pick 11.
Trading Pick 13 + Mackay for Aish + Pick 17 would mean Mackay is rated as a late first round pick, around Pick 15, assuming we have to match the value Collingwood have offered for Aish.
No deal, Brisbane reject it

But there is no direct evidence after the trade. If anything, the post-trade evidence points towards a lower valuation.
His value in 2012 is fixed. His value in 2015 is not fixed, and is definitely not the same as it was in 2012.
And Adelaide are the buyers of Menzel. If we valued him as pick #17, then that's his value too - and hence Kerridge's value is 40+.But they are the buyer, therefore - they have the ablity to set the market value.
"something is only worth, what someone is willing to pay for it"
If they are willing to pay it, that becomes his market value.
Could you blame him though? Sounds like Leppitsch is a bit of an ego maniac, poor facilities, poor on field results, questionable leadership under Rockliff.Menzel and carlton was amicable. If carlton wanted him he would of stayed.....aish is not comparable. Hes screwed the lions over
Could you blame him though? Sounds like Leppitsch is a bit of an ego maniac, poor facilities, poor on field results, questionable leadership under Rockliff.
I have zero interest, and very little respect for Aish since he nominated Collingwood when they had no currency to pay for him.

Hes given brisbane nothing now wants out to the club of his choice.....spoilt brat.