Does anyone think a payout tax of ~$20 per member a good idea? Of course it would be more for Coterie and premium memberships and less for kids and pensioners.
The reason I'm asking is that the biggest reason we still have Hardwick is that the cost of paying him out would be prohibitive. This is obvious to all including Caro and most media people. I've heard the question asked that if we hadn't extended his contract by two years, would he still be coach? The answer is always met by "obviously no".
Well, why do we still have to put up with him if money is the only reason? If we somehow could get the money for the club with minimal financial hurt factor to the individual, why wouldn't we do it?
Peoples thoughts please and a poll has been set up.
The reason I'm asking is that the biggest reason we still have Hardwick is that the cost of paying him out would be prohibitive. This is obvious to all including Caro and most media people. I've heard the question asked that if we hadn't extended his contract by two years, would he still be coach? The answer is always met by "obviously no".
Well, why do we still have to put up with him if money is the only reason? If we somehow could get the money for the club with minimal financial hurt factor to the individual, why wouldn't we do it?
Peoples thoughts please and a poll has been set up.











