Traded Tom Mitchell [traded to Hawthorn with pick 57 for pick 14 & 52]

[MaDEye23]

Not according to the Brownlow so far :s

Brownlow is a midfielders awards.

On SM-G900I using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[Hawk Dork]

Usually ones with bad disposal too

 

[DapperJong]

Brownlow is a midfielders awards.

On SM-G900I using BigFooty.com mobile app

In which he has 11 votes :s

 

[MaDEye23]

In which he has 11 votes :s

Never said anything about Tom.

On SM-G900I using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[HairyO]

Not according to the Brownlow so far :s

Players from the other team keep getting all the votes even in games when we won easily.

Ive never seen so many losing teams get the 3 votes. Happening across all teams.

 

[DapperJong]

Players from the other team keep getting all the votes even in games when we won easily.

Ive never seen so many losing teams get the 3 votes. Happening across all teams.

You said he was 40-50th best mid. He has 11 votes in a side that is basically all AA. What is this strange point you are making?

 

[doona]

You said he was 40-50th best mid. He has 11 votes in a side that is basically all AA. What is this strange point you are making?

Don't think he has a point.

On Nexus 6P using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[HairyO]

You said he was 40-50th best mid. He has 11 votes in a side that is basically all AA. What is this strange point you are making?

You think the Brownlow votes are a fair representation of ability?

Kennedy is on 2 votes and he had more and better disposals than Danger.

 

[eagle eyed]

http://www.triplem.com.au/sydney/sp...s-judd-flags-another-suitor-for-tom-mitchell/

How about pick 12?

 

[Mr Magic]

If Prestia is worth 6 you will need a top 5 to get Mitchell .

Prestia is not worth pick 6. I think Mitchell might be coming to RFC, Hawks, and others are going over a cliff

 

[WWSD]

Prestia is not worth pick 6. I think Mitchell might be coming to RFC, Hawks, and others are going over a cliff

Richmond have been mediocre for over 30 years and Richmond aren't a destination club.

Tom Mitchell will be at Hawthorn.

 

[DapperJong]

You think the Brownlow votes are a fair representation of ability?

Kennedy is on 2 votes and he had more and better disposals than Danger.

Come on mate.

 

[Jhye Clark 13]

Kennedy is on 2 votes and he had more and better disposals than Danger.

Averaged less possessions and his disposal efficiency was 68% in comparison to Dangers 70%.

 

[UnitedWarrior93]

Tom Mitchell should stay at the swans, club is in good shape and their window is open now, could win a couple of flags.

 

[kreglze]

I can see him perhaps looking at a big offer if the Swans win this weekend. He will have his premiership and look to make some hay while the sun is shining.

 

[mtooler]

He'll stay with us, be traded for Isaac Smith or pick 6 to Tigers.

 

[GerryLewis]

He'll stay with us, be traded for Isaac Smith or pick 6 to Tigers.

If you cant afford to keep Mitchell how are you going to pay for Smith? Think it'll be draft picks.

 

[TazHawk15]

Tom Mitchell should stay at the swans, club is in good shape and their window is open now, could win a couple of flags.

You obviously said the same thing about Danger last year I assume?

I mean Adelaide was in good shape and their window was and is wide open before Danger joined the club you support,So one can assume you thought Danger should have stayed a Crow.

 

[AGRESSION]

He'll stay with us, be traded for Isaac Smith or pick 6 to Tigers.

Would you take 6 and Ellis for 17/18 and Mitchell ?



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[bungwahl]

Would you take 6 and Ellis for 17/18 and Mitchell ?

If Presita is worth pick 6 then Mitchell is at least on par so effectively this could be split in to two trades. Would we swap our first rounder for Ellis? No I can't imagine we'd be keen to do that trade.

 

[Moldova]

No chance Hawthorn will get both Mitchell and O'Meara, 0%.

They could if they were prepared to trade one of their top players, but that isn't happening.

 

[HairyO]

Hey genius, they both ended up getting 12.

So Kennedy got 10 votes in the time Mitchell got 1? Im sure we could do some maths there too.

Hawks and Swans both had 17 wins. Swans got 105 votes, Hawks got 72. I guess despite having equal wins during the regular season the Swans were actually nearly 50% better - despite Hawks and Swans being 1 - 1 head to head.

Because the Brownlow tells us exactly how good players are. And exactly how good teams are.

 

[mtooler]

Would you take 6 and Ellis for 17/18 and Mitchell ?



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Me personally definitely yes, will our list management? I don't know.

 

[DapperJong]

So Kennedy got 10 votes in the time Mitchell got 1? Im sure we could do some maths there too.

Hawks and Swans both had 17 wins. Swans got 105 votes, Hawks got 72. I guess despite having equal wins during the regular season the Swans were actually nearly 50% better - despite Hawks and Swans being 1 - 1 head to head.

Because the Brownlow tells us exactly how good players are. And exactly how good teams are.

You used the Kennedy example to highlight that Kennedy is obviously a better player but had only 2 votes because apparently the Brownlow isn't a good representation of how good a player is. So why now are you talking about team results? Why do you insist on trying to justify your horrible argument?

 

[HairyO]

You used the Kennedy example to highlight that Kennedy is obviously a better player but had only 2 votes because apparently the Brownlow isn't a good representation of how good a player is. So why now are you talking about team results? Why do you insist on trying to justify your horrible argument?

Because the Brownlow is not a good indicator of either team or individual performance? And hasnt been for a couple of decades, once umpires decided they generally only cared about midfielders?

If the Brownlow is a good indicator, the Swans should be offering Mitchell similar money to Kennedy? Instead they want him to take a pay cut. Maybe someone should let Longmire know how well he did last night.