- Mar 28, 2010
- 5,342
- 6,038
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Other Teams
- Miami Heat
"Offsite black ops injection, harming unborn babies and drug smuggling from a Mexican drug cartel saga."
Check out that hard term
Check out that hard term
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What a strange metric.And still in front of Carlton in every conceivable metric.
Are you seriousIt was a supplements saga...
So the terminology is correct...
They weren't drugs.
You forgot the asterisk for the 16, one of those was won in a year that Essenon was convicted of cheating and another was won in a round robin where Essendon lost both it's finals against Richmond, any other year you would not have even contested for the flag.Hawks Premierships: 13
Hawks Wooden Spoons: 11
Essendon Premierships: 16
Essendon Wooden Spoons: 5*
The only thing that matters.
Are you serious
PED
Performance Enhancing Drug
Even if it were the case, we'd still be ahead.You forgot the asterisk for the 16, one of those was won in a year that Essenon was convicted of cheating and another was won in a round robin where Essendon lost both it's finals against Richmond, any other year you would not have even contested for the flag.
The punishment is over for the players, and final for the upper echelon involved.
Can we just put this one to sleep?
Supplements!
Actually your first flag was also won with a round robin formula so Essendon has won 14 grand finals with at least one of those achieved while cheating.Even if it were the case, we'd still be ahead.
Don't be too mad.
Over his dead body.Oh Lance, I admire how committed you are to defending your club but sooner or later you're going to have to accept defeat.
Supplemented Danks incomeIt was a club sanctioned Illegal Performance Enhancing Drugs regime...
So the terminology is correct...
They weren't supplements.
But, but what will they do with their lives??So people are really struggling to let go, eh?
Says 16 in the books doesn't it? Bad luck champ you keep fighting though okActually your first flag was also won with a round robin formula so Essendon has won 14 grand finals with at least one of those achieved while cheating.
Just stating some facts, 14 GF wins, plus 2 round robins and one flag tainted by cheating, lots of asterisks there, like it or notSays 16 in the books doesn't it? Bad luck champ you keep fighting though ok
Good on ya. Fact is it says 16 in the book.Just stating some facts, 14 GF wins, plus 2 round robins and one flag tainted by cheating, lots of asterisks there, like it or not
Good on ya. Fact is it says 16 in the book.
Lol different topic. Caring about what you want to call this past saga? Zero.Fact is the records show that the EFC implemented a club sanctioned doping program so you must agree that the "supplement saga" should now and forever more be referred to as the "club sanctioned doping program"
There is another book that mentions 666, I assumed that was Hirdy's number, still the books about AFL have Essendon on 14 Grand Final victories and 2 round robins, so yes 16 flags but with asterisks.Good on ya. Fact is it says 16 in the book.
Wish i could do multiple likes to this postThere is another book that mentions 666, I assumed that was Hirdy's number, still the books about AFL have Essendon on 14 Grand Final victories and 2 round robins, so yes 16 flags but with asterisks.
call it whatever you like. The findings and penalties are in the past. It's yesterday's newsEvery time a legitimate point is made on here, how come Essendon supporters divert the topic into a baiting game and redirect the conversation so nobody actually talks about the real topic?
One reporter on twitter said he uses 'supplements saga' simply because it is shorter.
He reports facts incorrectly due to the use of easier language, if you take him at his word.
Clearly, the AFL media have been told to avoid words such as 'performance-enhancing', 'drugs', 'experimental', etc.
It's blatantly unethical for the AFL media to coordinate their manipulation of public perception through significantly downplaying something as serious as performance enhancing drugs.
Call it the PEDS saga, for short.