Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

That seems a backhanded compliment
Any reason?
Or just,
![]()
Nice av squirtleWhat a game that was.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
"The keyboard warriors have been proven wrong because he's at the tribunal now proving his case"http://www.news.com.au/video/id-5348771529001-5484502009001/Lewis-on-Oliver-dive-claim
I'll just leave this here
http://www.news.com.au/video/id-5348771529001-5484502009001/Lewis-on-Oliver-dive-claim
I'll just leave this here
My mistake, I didn't give the Lewis story any of my time so I had no idea about the keyboard warrior thingIts a compliment and a pisstake of Lewis on Fox ..

It fits in with why Oliver wasn't at the tribunal . Afl lawyer can't be that incompetentHeard from someone this afternoon that this whole situation has been managed by the AFL from early Sunday morning. If Schofield was let off by the MRP then the media cycle would focus on Oliver diving and why wasn't he charged which is not the look the AFL wanted. Melbourne were told to provide a medical report that would lean towards heavy contact but not get them in trouble for allowing a concussed player back into the game. So Schofield was offered a week and West Coast were told if they challenged he would get off. They challenged, we had a show trial and here we are. Will be followed by a general warning to players at all clubs that there will now be a crackdown on diving similar to the crackdown on jumper punches.
That's drifting into tin foil hat territoryHeard from someone this afternoon that this whole situation has been managed by the AFL from early Sunday morning. If Schofield was let off by the MRP then the media cycle would focus on Oliver diving and why wasn't he charged which is not the look the AFL wanted. Melbourne were told to provide a medical report that would lean towards heavy contact but not get them in trouble for allowing a concussed player back into the game. So Schofield was offered a week and West Coast were told if they challenged he would get off. They challenged, we had a show trial and here we are. Will be followed by a general warning to players at all clubs that there will now be a crackdown on diving similar to the crackdown on jumper punches.
Better result for Schofield being found NG anyway, no fine.That's drifting into tin foil hat territory
Could have achieved a better result by assessing it the same as Parkers elbow (careless instead of intentional) and fining Schofield
Also if they wanted to shift the focus away from Oliver diving why would they then warn players there's going to be a crackdown on diving. That's just generating the result they set out to avoid
Doesn't actually make any sense and seems like a lot of work lining people up to play along to achieve what exactly
Also, SURELY the QC said "skirting" and it was transcribed incorrectly. ******* funny either way

Yeah, nah.Heard from someone this afternoon that this whole situation has been managed by the AFL from early Sunday morning. If Schofield was let off by the MRP then the media cycle would focus on Oliver diving and why wasn't he charged which is not the look the AFL wanted. Melbourne were told to provide a medical report that would lean towards heavy contact but not get them in trouble for allowing a concussed player back into the game. So Schofield was offered a week and West Coast were told if they challenged he would get off. They challenged, we had a show trial and here we are. Will be followed by a general warning to players at all clubs that there will now be a crackdown on diving similar to the crackdown on jumper punches.
Lack of cherries in the middle there!![]()
Raise your Diablos in triumph boys
Lack of cherries in the middle there!
The best bat to have as a youngster was this one![]()
Raise your Diablos in triumph boys
I knew Oliver had an insider on our boardSo a typical Damien Martyn bat then.
Please don't hurt me.
I had a Gray Nicholls Dynadrive with the double scoop.The best bat to have as a youngster was this one
![]()
I know that i'm POTY material but i can't see how i can be confused with Keys.You confused your No-Doz with your Viagra again?
he batted at 10.Lack of cherries in the middle there!
So a typical Damien Martyn bat then.
Test average around 46?
Please don't hurt me.
If thats true, I'm disappointed by the news. Oliver should have been made an example of. If that was a duggan or barrass and they would have got the maximum penalty.Heard from someone this afternoon that this whole situation has been managed by the AFL from early Sunday morning. If Schofield was let off by the MRP then the media cycle would focus on Oliver diving and why wasn't he charged which is not the look the AFL wanted. Melbourne were told to provide a medical report that would lean towards heavy contact but not get them in trouble for allowing a concussed player back into the game. So Schofield was offered a week and West Coast were told if they challenged he would get off. They challenged, we had a show trial and here we are. Will be followed by a general warning to players at all clubs that there will now be a crackdown on diving similar to the crackdown on jumper punches.