- Thread starter
- #2,001
The money's getting paid, by the punters, the networks, the advertisers. Who should get to keep it?
W80.
I just dont think we have got value for money this year
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The money's getting paid, by the punters, the networks, the advertisers. Who should get to keep it?
No doubt in my mind Waite gets another year. Brad loves him and there's unlikely to be cap issues holding him out.
yeah its not like he misses many games thru injury or anythingHe still has plenty to offer as long as he stays on the park
Is a proven match winner and will help Brown develop
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ok so who teaches Durdin and Mckay who are different types compared to BBB to lead and cut angles.........?yeah its not like he misses many games thru injury or anything
My gut tells me we wouldn't bother with that if we weren't giving him another go. But I tell my gut to shut up all the time.
Averaging less than 14 games per year for the last 9 years. And some people still think he might be able ton"stay on the park"!!yeah its not like he misses many games thru injury or anything
I might be thinking a bit out of the square here but what about Scott, Tudor and Boomer? You know, our "coaches"?ok so who teaches Durdin and Mckay who are different types compared to BBB to lead and cut angles.........?
Majak ?? yeah right.
Waite stays another year even if the maximum vale to the club could be on the training track.
Waite is a freak when it comes to contested marking........try to enlighten us all how those , can show those 2 players.I might be thinking a bit out of the square here but what about Scott, Tudor and Boomer? You know, our "coaches"?
whilst he's been playing with us he has shown nothing but professionalism.......Your figures are correct.....but many of those years were suspension related and yes some injury as well.Averaging less than 14 games per year for the last 9 years. And some people still think he might be able ton"stay on the park"!!
So we've moved on from leading and angles? Ok. Waite is a great player when playing and I don't disagree he adds to the team at training but you don't keep him just because he's the only one that can teach football, cause he's not. I can certainly see the benefit of offering a coaching role, and if we can't afford it under football spend we could hang on to him and pay him as a player. Problem is, if he's injured he's more concerned with his own rehab rather than coaching.Waite is a freak when it comes to contested marking........try to enlighten us all how those , can show those 2 players.
Getting suspended from your work place...not really professional conduct is it? ;-)whilst he's been playing with us he has shown nothing but professionalism.......Your figures are correct.....but many of those years were suspension related and yes some injury as well.
Not necessarily. They did this for Lachie three months ago:My gut tells me we wouldn't bother with that if we weren't giving him another go. But I tell my gut to shut up all the time.
Not necessarily. They did this for Lachie three months ago:
while he has been playing for us he has been excellent........you cannot deny that.So we've moved on from leading and angles? Ok. Waite is a great player when playing and I don't disagree he adds to the team at training but you don't keep him just because he's the only one that can teach football, cause he's not. I can certainly see the benefit of offering a coaching role, and if we can't afford it under football spend we could hang on to him and pay him as a player. Problem is, if he's injured he's more concerned with his own rehab rather than coaching.
Getting suspended from your work place...not really professional conduct is it? ;-)
Waite has been a great player. But we need to go with Larkey & McKay instead.