Probably not , but they have not got one as wrong as today's
-
Mobile App Discontinued
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Was BBL 7 rigged?
- Thread starter Restricted Free Agent
- Start date
-
- Tags
- bbl bbl7 match fixing strikers
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
Probably not , but they have not got one as wrong as today's
- Aug 10, 2005
- 46,545
- 42,486
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
There really isn’t.
- Moderator
- #29
If the big bash was rigged a NSW or Vic team would win every year.
Today the Hurricanes played like Shit and the Strikers played well that's all it came down to.
Today the Hurricanes played like Shit and the Strikers played well that's all it came down to.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Did you watch last time Hobart played here? They had two plumb not given out.
- Sep 15, 2011
- 35,647
- 57,883
- AFL Club
- West Coast
The inconsistency around releasing players is frustrating, but it's incompetence, not conspiracy. It's like they realised too late just how popular BBL has become and how important it is to have your best players out there. I can see some scheduling changes next year.
But otherwise, it's just congrats to the Strikers, equal best most of the season, performed better in the finals. Good on 'em.
But otherwise, it's just congrats to the Strikers, equal best most of the season, performed better in the finals. Good on 'em.
- Aug 10, 2005
- 46,545
- 42,486
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
What inconsistency?
- Jun 9, 2015
- 13,606
- 10,454
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
Was it rigged the other year when Penguin Waugh manipulated the system to his liking to benefit the tunder and allow the best player in the country at the time in khawaja to play and win them the title?
Salt shaker city tonight on bigfooty!
Salt shaker city tonight on bigfooty!
- Sep 15, 2011
- 35,647
- 57,883
- AFL Club
- West Coast
That the Scorchers and Canes were without Agar, Tye and Short because of international commitments, then Head gets released for his semi-final, then Head, Carey and Short for the final. It was a bit of a **** up.
- Aug 10, 2005
- 46,545
- 42,486
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
Wheres the **** up? Makes perfect sense to me and seems completely fair.
Power Play
Club Legend
Jake Lehmann was allowed to play every game for the Strikers during BBL 7. This is concrete evidence that Cricket Australia didn't rig the tournament for the Strikers to win the title.
Case closed.
Case closed.
Don't think so.it's in CA's interest to have the best players out there.Adelaide beat a very good opponent in the GF.Setup by a fantastic batting display.And there attack wasn't conseading 200 runs.
It's what I love most about this forum, nobody ever wins anything any more because they deserve to win.
Restricted Free Agent
President of the Conor Nash fan club
- Thread starter
- #39
Renegades VS Scorchers there were a few shockers
Restricted Free Agent
President of the Conor Nash fan club
- Thread starter
- #40
Ouch
- Jun 30, 2014
- 10,169
- 5,513
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Banned
- #41
M Waugh also helped rig it by having Sean Abbott his love child play every game and allowed to bowl at the end of the inning
Not going with the notion of it being rigged but it was a nice back flip from CA making Short, Head (available for semi as well) and Carey available for the final after previously staying that national duties would hold precedence over Big Bash.
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
The difference being Agar, Tye and Short were playing on Saturday night whereas Head wasn't. Then, with none of them playing until Wednesday, the batsman (not the bowlers) were released to play on Sunday. It's really not that complicated.
- Jan 13, 2015
- 1,980
- 1,320
- AFL Club
- Sydney
cricket Australia not releasing smith, warner, starc, hazlewood, cummins (nsw) & paine (tas) for Sheffield shield duties.
He can't hear you through all the tinfoil.
Tigerssaints
Club Legend
please explain, JUst what i said
Head was the only member of the Aus squad released for the semis because the Aus selectors had already decided that he wouldn't be in the Aus XI for the Saturday night game. The other players who could've been released (Short, Agar, Tye, Carey, Stanlake and Richardson) were all playing for Aus on Saturday night so weren't allowed to play on Thursday or Friday. It's pretty self-explanatory.
- Sep 15, 2011
- 35,647
- 57,883
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Except JL said the MOU signed by clubs and players stated that players couldn't play two games in a row. Anyone who played on Saturday was ineligible by CA's own rules from playing on Sunday. Also, why wasn't Stanlake allowed to play while the others were?
I explicitly stated there was no conspiracy, each semi and the final was played on equal terms. But it's inconsistent as hell.
Similar threads
- Sticky
