All about Trump

[Thatsmyname]

Everything you said makes you sound like a conspiracy theorist, are you a Doomsday prepper?, do you have an underground bunker? Never argue politics and religion

I think you are inadvertently exposing your own bent

 

[manicpie]

I think you are inadvertently exposing your own bent

Not commenting any further sorry, just letting you know what you sound like

 

[Thatsmyname]

Not commenting any further sorry, just letting you know what you sound like

Uh huh, and exposing yourself in the process

 

[sirlothie]

The brainwash is scary on this one.

 

[Countrypie]

Yeah they are all dirty, massive revelation, but this pathetic tactic of accusing the opposition of what you are really doing is the true litmus test

Its a tactic from the Saul Alinsky book - rules for radicals - a personal favourite of one of the US candidates in the 2016 election

 

[Thatsmyname]

Its a tactic from the Saul Alinsky book - rules for radicals - a personal favourite of one of the US candidates in the 2016 election

It's a beautiful tactic because there's an element of truth that makes you take your eyes off the coathanger coming and the real danger, Trumpians employ it all the time

 

[Countrypie]

When you understand the tactic you understand Uranium 1 and the Russian collusion delusion.

 

[Maggie5]

When you understand the tactic you understand Uranium 1 and the Russian collusion delusion.

Would make a good meme.

 

[Black_White]

Careful, he's one of those ones who if countered with any kind of facts or logic detrimental to his point he will just block you and put his head back in the sand and continue living in his own little make believe,

Says the Trump acolyte!

 

[sirlothie]

Says the Trump acolyte!

Lol I'm just not stupid enough to believe the hysteria that Trump is the most evil man in history and Hillary Clinton would have been our saviour! The very same people who got sucked into believing every single person was being racist towards Adam Goodes!

I've got a brain I can think with for myself.

 

[sirlothie]

It just goes to show how brainwashed people are by bullshit that they think they can use Trump supporter as some kind of grievous insult as if it was the same as being a Hitler supporter. Get a grip. If he had done anything truly bad, he would not still be in possession of that office, and try as they might, they haven't pinned a thing on him so the egg is on you for being a believer of untruths based on your collective mass agitation and delirium. Utter sheeple.

 

[Black_White]

Lol I'm just not stupid enough to believe the hysteria that Trump is the most evil man in history and Hillary Clinton would have been our saviour! The very same people who got sucked into believing every single person was being racist towards Adam Goodes!

I've got a brain I can think with for myself.

But your comment on Clinton shows you can’t think for yourself.
Hillary didn’t win, but the acolytes Of Trump constantly bring her up.
Why?
I don’t know, I suspect because she’s a woman, and woman don’t carry much weight in the Trump acolyte world.
If you could think for yourself, and not swallow the Trump acolytes thinking, then Clinton would never have entered your thought process.
Hoisted upon your own petard,

 

[Black_White]

It just goes to show how brainwashed people are by bulls**t that they think they can use Trump supporter as some kind of grievous insult as if it was the same as being a Hitler supporter. Get a grip. If he had done anything truly bad, he would not still be in possession of that office, and try as they might, they haven't pinned a thing on him so the egg is on you for being a believer of untruths based on your collective mass agitation and delirium. Utter sheeple.

Yeah...sure.
Just another acolyte blindness to reality.

The legal rule that has saved Donald Trump twice

Robert Mueller’s testimony before Congress may not have delivered the bombshell Donald Trump’s critics were hoping for, but the special counsel did give us an important insight into why the President escaped from his investigation relatively unscathed.

www.news.com.au

Mr Mueller’s answers strongly implied a legal technicality was the only reason he did not recommend indicting Mr Trump for obstruction of justice.

“We, at the outset, determined that, when it came to the President’s culpability, we needed to go forward only after taking into account the OLC opinion that indicated that a sitting president cannot be indicted,” Mr Mueller said.

The constitution of the USofA unfortunately doesn’t address the culpability of a sitting President. So the USofA decided long ago that a sitting President cannot be prosecuted.
Your assertion that Trump wouldn’t still be President if he had truly done anything wrong falls on this interpretation.

 

[sirlothie]

But your comment on Clinton shows you can’t think for yourself.
Hillary didn’t win, but the acolytes Of Trump constantly bring her up.
Why?
I don’t know, I suspect because she’s a woman, and woman don’t carry much weight in the Trump acolyte world.
If you could think for yourself, and not swallow the Trump acolytes thinking, then Clinton would never have entered your thought process.
Hoisted upon your own petard,

Some mental gymnastics going on there but ok.

 

[Black_White]

Some mental gymnastics going on there but ok.

So... no actual defence?
Maybe you need a few hours to check out the Trump ultra right wing forums for an answer.
I expect your signed up to a few.

 

[sideswipe]

But your comment on Clinton shows you can’t think for yourself.
Hillary didn’t win, but the acolytes Of Trump constantly bring her up.
Why?
I don’t know, I suspect because she’s a woman, and woman don’t carry much weight in the Trump acolyte world.
If you could think for yourself, and not swallow the Trump acolytes thinking, then Clinton would never have entered your thought process.
Hoisted upon your own petard,

Helpful hint - a petard is an incendiary device. One is hoist (not hoisted) by a petard, not upon one.


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[sirlothie]

Yeah...sure.
Just another acolyte blindness to reality.

The legal rule that has saved Donald Trump twice

Robert Mueller’s testimony before Congress may not have delivered the bombshell Donald Trump’s critics were hoping for, but the special counsel did give us an important insight into why the President escaped from his investigation relatively unscathed.

www.news.com.au

The constitution of the USofA unfortunately doesn’t address the culpability of a sitting President. So the USofA decided long ago that a sitting President cannot be prosecuted.
Your assertion that Trump wouldn’t still be President if he had truly done anything wrong falls on this interpretation.

So he is guilty of wielding the axe on a few people he didn't feel were serving him correctly, potentially? Gee whiz, hang him! What an evil, evil, evil man.

 

[sirlothie]

Where's all the evidence of the heinous crimes against humanity? The justification for the hysteria of hatred levelled at Trump and the sickening labels applied to him and his supporters? Or "acolytes" as one likes to put it with his expanded vocabulary as if we are fighting a religious war... so he left a few bodies on the side of the road like Mick Malthouse or anybody who reaches position of power for that matter... so what gives? Why is he any worse than anybody else? Because you want to believe these things, not because any of it is true. It's just a mass, sour, bitter dummy spit that shows the left's true colours levelling horrendous baseless accusations at him. It's sickening. I shudder to see what they will come up with when he gets a second term.

 

[Black_White]

So he is guilty of wielding the axe on a few people he didn't feel were serving him correctly, potentially? Gee whiz, hang him! What an evil, evil, evil man.

There’s the problem.
No Trump acolyte would ever understand that he has avoided prosecution from the enquiry into election manipulation because of the technicality that Mueller himself quoted.
Without that technicality Trump would be up on charges of manipulation. That much is clear.
Trump acolytes love to try and derail the conversation by referencing previous candidates. Hell, don’t ever actually look at Trump and his history or his racist policies.
Oh, and the old come back “orange man, bad” well that’s the ultimate compliment to anyone, yes anyone, who argues against Trump.
Most of us have got over his ridiculous hairpiece long, long ago and focus on his policies and racism.

 

[sirlothie]

There’s the problem.
No Trump acolyte would ever understand that he has avoided prosecution from the enquiry into election manipulation because of the technicality that Mueller himself quoted.
Without that technicality Trump would be up on charges of manipulation. That much is clear.
Trump acolytes love to try and derail the conversation by referencing previous candidates. Hell, don’t ever actually look at Trump and his history or his racist policies.
Oh, and the old come back “orange man, bad” well that’s the ultimate compliment to anyone, yes anyone, who argues against Trump.
Most of us have got over his ridiculous hairpiece long, long ago and focus on his policies and racism.

You're going to have to do better to justify the hate and vitriol spewed at him on a daily basis. You are just galvanising his support. Illegal immigrants aren't a race.

 

[Kappa]

Unfortunately flinging insults at your opponents in a debate ultimately is a complete waste of time, achieves nothing, and only makes you look worse.

 

[Thatsmyname]

Unfortunately flinging insults at your opponents in a debate ultimately is a complete waste of time, achieves nothing, and only makes you look worse.

So you're saying fling actual s**t at them... I like it

 

[sirlothie]

Unfortunately flinging insults at your opponents in a debate ultimately is a complete waste of time, achieves nothing, and only makes you look worse.

You should have seen the s**t that got deleted.

 

[cliffdrabble]

I cannot believe that any person with a working brain could support such a village idiot like Trump. If you ask a Trump supporter what they actually know about him, it is very little.

How did Trump become rich?
He inherited over $400 million dollars from his father in the early 1970's -the equivqalent of about 20 billion today . He is reprted to be worth around $8 billion today. So he has actually squandered some of his inheritance. His father made his fortune out of brothels and real estate.

What successful business has he run ?
Very little, in fact he has sent 4 Casinos broke. I mean , how do you send a casino broke? it is a license to print money.l Only a village idiot sends a casino broke. By the way most of the staff working at the casino lost millions in unpaid wages and several small buisnesses were sent to the wall. None have since been paid, yet the prick bangs on about how rich he is.

Is he a sleaze bag?
He used to hold parties with a friend of his who is now in jail after being convicted of rapeing several girls aged 13 and under at these parties. Does this prove his guilt? No, but you have to wonder when he supplied a charater reference for the defendant that basically said his friend was a great guy but like himself, had an eye for young girls. Do we forget his 'you can just grab women by the pussy' comments.

Why ishe a village idiot?
Well village idiot number 1 , Ronald introduced trickle down economics and deregulation that led to an almight recession in 1990

 

[Thatsmyname]

Rob Reiner

@robreiner

Still wondering if The President of the United States is a racist? All you need to know is that the surviving patients of the horrific White Supremacist attack in El Paso refused to meet with him. #Impeach/VoteOut/Indict