Sanders won't be able to go back on his policies before the election, his movement now has too many other candidates standing for office on the same platform.
It provides harmless amusement for us to see Trump get some of his own medicine, but it won't influence Trumpers (as we know, they do and will think "their side" is "winning" the exchange, no matter what), and I can't see how it has any effect in persuading anyone else to vote for the dems, or indeed to vote at all.
I dunno. If it's not Sanders I fully expect it'll be Bloomberg. I don't see it going elsewhere at the moment.
Yeah. Still can't believe the Democrats are genuinely stupid enough to go the impeachment route knowing it would obviously re-energise his base.
Again, do you mean?
The first time
Hmm, I think that there was too much pressure, both from their base and from within Congress, insisting that they do the right thing and uphold the Constitution.
Pelosi is another centrist loser who stands for nothing but the furtherment of her own career.
And put themselves into a position to either elect Trump or Clinton.
Oh yes, she clearly didn't want to do the impeachment, but she just thought, if she had to do the right thing, that she would be able to use it as a political tactic.
You're basing that on an n=1 sample where you're talking about conservatives.
Not before the election he won't.
Agreed that's how Pelosi and her ilk saw it, but others in the base and Congress clearly saw it as doing the right thing.
I will ultimately be proven correct.no s**t, the whole thread is us spitballing opinions and guess work. you dont get to be the only one
Doing the right thing is stupid if it leads to Trump serving a second term lol. Pelosi is a gremlin though.
Never said it did, but many saw it that way, and it was a driver in pressuring the DNC lot to do it.
