Has earned a spot, needs to be elevated. You dont string along players who work hard.No, we can keep him on as a rookie for a 3rd season.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty AFLW Notice Img
AFLW 2025 - AFLW Trade and Draft - All the player moves
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Has earned a spot, needs to be elevated. You dont string along players who work hard.No, we can keep him on as a rookie for a 3rd season.
Gone:
Kreuzer
Simpson
Goddard
Lang
O'Dwyer
B Silvagni
Macreadie
Moore
Polson
50/50:
Kennedy
Apparently being offered deals but surely we might reconsider:
Casboult
Murphy
Betts
Anyone see it differently to that?
I don't think we can lose all of Goodard, Macreadie and BSOS. If Weitering or Jones was injured we would have 0 backup. Would suggest we keep Macreadie. Injury issues but is talented.
Would much rather keep Polson, then Betts on the list.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I think we keep Murph as much as a clever small forward option as a mid - there’s no g’tee we’ll get the small forward we need in the off season. He is good around goals when played there where he can use his footy smarts. Though, the forward pressure bit has me worried. After tonite, surely the likes of Cuners and Fish won’t be there as much next year and he’d give us more than Gibbo who I see as good mid depth, more than anything, in the coming years.Agree with the 'Gone' except not sure on BSOS (literally know nothing about his development).
McGovern should not have a contract renewed under any circumstances. Has not played for the jumper one bit, like I posted elsewhere, I don't care how much 'upside' there is to him, the club needs to make statement that you are here to play for the jumper.
For that reason alone, Levi gets another contract. Murph is about cooked but we keep him on as depth or he retires. Betts stays unless we get Papley (unlikely) or have developed someone in his spot. Kennedy has played ok in the games he's been in, hasn't set the world alight, but unsure why he has been dropped ahead of others less deserving.
With all the players together in the Hub, I imagine exit interviews will probably happen today before sending the players away for their break.
Pretty fair effort for your second post. Take a bow.I thought I would post up some points of interest on our list demographic to make for good conversation;
I think the list below highlights the fact that we have players with very little AFL experience games wise and to also give the team a little more credit for the season we have had and improvement shown.
This team has a huge amount of upside and if we manage to trade in some quality A graders we should be able to fast track up the ladder next year.
Most teams tend to see big improvement when the majority of their best 22 hit 100-150 games played, something to keep in mind.
In Yellow players that have played under 50 games
In Green players that have played under 100 games
View attachment 965719
View attachment 965720
View attachment 965721
I doubt Adelaide would even be interested. They need more dynamic types plus are chasing Hatley who also doesn’t really match what they need too much.Is there any real possibility graham would come to us instead of going home to Adelaide -- if he wins a second premiership think he hard to stop him going to Adelaide than us
Agree but I dont think Murph wants to play there. Seemed relieved and thrived when moved back into the midfield. May retire rather than go back there.I think we keep Murph as much as a clever small forward option as a mid - there’s no g’tee we’ll get the small forward we need in the off season. He is good around goals when played there where he can use his footy smarts. Though, the forward pressure bit has me worried. After tonite, surely the likes of Cuners and Fish won’t be there as much next year and he’d give us more than Gibbo who I see as good mid depth, more than anything, in the coming years.
I don't know how the club can offer Betts another year. He has been lucky to be in the team a lot of weeks.
If he does get another year it is the type of decision that can create a wedge in the club. Particularly amongst players. I can think of examples at my own amateur level where players start to question and talk behind peoples backs, it's not good for culture (I am aware local and AFL are worlds apart).
It is sad seeing a champion like Betts come to the end but the easy thing to do is to let him play on.
It is such as important off season.
Murphy has been extended, same as Levi maybe not formally but they have both reached triggers in their contracts that give them an extension... forget where I heard/read this.
IMO Murph needs to replace Walsh on the wing, and Walsh start in the guts. MM is a liability at a stoppage because he can not tackle and is ideally suited to that outside running game, he occasionally stuffs it up but he is one of the few players who can hit a target inside 50.
We should know by Monday night I suspect.With all the players together in the Hub, I imagine exit interviews will probably happen today before sending the players away for their break.
Team for next season with new players in areas to improve us:
B: Plowman----------------Marchbank-------------Newman
H: Docherty----------------Weitering---------------*Saad
C: Newnes-------------------Cripps-----------------O'Brien
H: Cuningham-------------C.Curnow---------------Martin
F: *NewPlayer------------McKay-----------------*NewPlayer
Foll: *NewPlayer, Setterfield, Walsh
Bench: Williamson, SPS, Dow, McGovern
Team for next season with new players in areas to improve us:
B: Plowman----------------Marchbank-------------Newman
H: Docherty----------------Weitering---------------*Saad
C: Newnes-------------------Cripps-----------------O'Brien
H: Cuningham-------------C.Curnow---------------Martin
F: *NewPlayer------------McKay-----------------*NewPlayer
Foll: *NewPlayer, Setterfield, Walsh
Bench: Williamson, SPS, Dow, McGovern
How on earth is Liam Jones not in that team?
Or SPSHow did we play another season and not find out if Cuningham can be a midfielder of good ability?
Or SPS
Would like to keep Macreadie and - depending on the development coaches thoughts - potentially Polson, but other than that I agree.Gone:
Kreuzer
Simpson
Goddard
Lang
O'Dwyer
B Silvagni
Macreadie
Moore
Polson
50/50:
Kennedy
Apparently being offered deals but surely we might reconsider:
Casboult
Murphy
Betts
Anyone see it differently to that?
I'm asking for a greater understanding of what's going on, because I'm not seeing a lot of work inside the stoppage from Kennedy. I'm also getting really tired of people saying he's above average at anything to do with midfield play.
He has clean hands, fast hands and great game sense, but he loses more physical contests than he wins at the stoppage, whether it be holding his ground under pressure, or spreading from it. Like, a lot more.
He looks like the same as when he was drafted: a crafty general forward who has knee issues and appears to lack adequate pace. He should never have been pick 10.
As he coasts more in that direction, we should be looking at players like Kemp, Stocker, Philp, Dow, Setterfield and JSOS for being better at what we're hoping Kennedy can bring to our squad.
Where does he fit in with all those names already here? It's no coincidence that all bar one of those names was unavailable for selection this week, but it's in moments like that, 6 names down the depth chart, where we should be thinking differently with our tactics instead of retaining a player that doesn't really perform adequately in the role at AFL level.
So are we still delisting Kennedy? According to some he didn't even have trade value.
23 disposals at 70% 6 clearences and 4 tackles.
Love how people expect the world of Kennedy, Polson, Plowman, Newnes, Lob, Williamson and Gibbons. Happy to scream they are sh*t and should be dropped delisted etc.
But are happy to give Murphy, McGovern, Casboult and co a free pass.
I'd much rather see Polson who has played 19 AFL games mind and all of 3 as a defender continue to get games at AFL level. He takes on the game and takes the risky kicks. That will pay off with time and development at AFL level.
Much rather see that then Marc Murphy who has played 285 AFL games, continue to jog around and get shrugged off when he attempts the odd tackle. Our sh*t his pants whenever contact comes.
But again the standards some set for our developing kids is laughable.
And when the opposition have the ball we are literally playing with 17 on the field. Some ageing former stars dont know how to retire gracefully. A club with a strong culture would have managed him out.Murphy has been extended, same as Levi maybe not formally but they have both reached triggers in their contracts that give them an extension... forget where I heard/read this.
IMO Murph needs to replace Walsh on the wing, and Walsh start in the guts. MM is a liability at a stoppage because he can not tackle and is ideally suited to that outside running game, he occasionally stuffs it up but he is one of the few players who can hit a target inside 50.