fronkalicious
Brownlow Medallist
If we keep Richards, he absolutely has to go to half-back, with Daniel and JJ moving on to the wing.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty AFLW Notice Img
AFLW 2025 - AFLW Trade and Draft - All the player moves
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
I hope we do keep Richards. He’s one of a handful of players on our list who has the ability to break the lines. Our playing group severely lacks that kind of leg speed.If we keep Richards, he absolutely has to go to half-back, with Daniel and JJ moving on to the wing.
So what do we think is a reasonable price for Treloar? Trade wise and salary wise??
For me? The 5 years is scary. I love him as a player though. Like Chris Paul in the NBA, the size of his contract has confused how good he is as a player. Treloar is awesome.
So..
Salary - $500k is the max I would go to. If we miss out, so be it.
Trade - I’d dangle Richards and a future 3rd. Again, if we can miss, we miss. Gut feel is his value is super low now, and Eddie wants Richards so so bad....
That would leave our Dunkley trade bounty to use elsewhere.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I'd much rather offer Dale (who Eddie also loves) as part of the trade rather than Richards.So what do we think is a reasonable price for Treloar? Trade wise and salary wise??
For me? The 5 years is scary. I love him as a player though. Like Chris Paul in the NBA, the size of his contract has confused how good he is as a player. Treloar is awesome.
So..
Salary - $500k is the max I would go to. If we miss out, so be it.
Trade - I’d dangle Richards and a future 3rd. Again, if we can miss, we miss. Gut feel is his value is super low now, and Eddie wants Richards so so bad....
That would leave our Dunkley trade bounty to use elsewhere.
That would be a very good outcome imoI’m all aboard the Treloar train now!!
Would happily renegotiate a 3-4 yr deal with him at $600k with Pies covering $1-150k.
Pretty much what our next Dunks contract would’ve cost us.
I’m also coming around to a 1st and AMT in a deal with the Bombers.
1st to Pies for Treloar and change for JUH, Dunks to Ess for future 1st and AMT, Martin pre season draft, Hannan 3rd, JUH with what’s left over this year.
Take 2 1sts in to next year and potentially use to bring in established player/s then.
Treloar
AMT
Martin
Hannan
JUH
Our list is improved by a fair bit with those ins. It’s also shaken up a bit which probably needs to happen.
Not too much of a reach thinking those trades could get done imo.
Absolutely put the onus on Essington to put a compelling offer to us. Just keep on adding Dodo we will tell you when it's enough or else it's time to be quiet and slink awayDisagree, I thought he said what a lot of us here have been saying.
It's up to Essendon to come to us with a compelling trade otherwise we are happy to welcome him back.
He put it on Essendon to come up with something significant. Not weak at all.
It is amazing that Essendope supporters think we should just hand over Dunkley while they are now trying to keep Saad
Yep the more I think about it the more I agree, also it’s interesting that his meters gained stat is not as good as our other midfieldersThe big thing in 2015-16 was that there was a total buy-in from the whole squad. Disruptive influences affected our performance in subsequent years. We can’t afford to keep even one player whose heart is not 100% committed so best if Josh goes. He’s burnt his bridges with us.
I really hope we play Martin and English together. Like, a normal team.....for once.
Why would Bevo put him in a spot that he’s good atIf we keep Richards, he absolutely has to go to half-back, with Daniel and JJ moving on to the wing.

!! What’s wrong with the wing then halfback then half forward then wing then halfback!! I feel you mate I hope he has a good preseason and cements himself in halfback next year and is not moved around.Yeah but 700k on one player is different to spread over a couple. What if he gets injured again and how many years would we be committedWe are not getting Treloar at 500k a year, Collingwood are not paying 400k of his contract, that defeats the purpose of offloading his contract. To put in perspective we paid 500k to sit Trengove in reserves all year this year, take him and Dunkley off books more than pays the 700k we would need for Treloar.
If AMT and a first that we turned into Treloar was the outcome of Dunks moving on I’d be a happy camper.. Firstly AMT leaving the bummers would hurt them even more with what they are already have walking out the door and would sour their smugness in obtaining Dunks. Secondly and more importantly I think he will thrive in our team, give us that speed we need in our fwd 50 and next to Wallis we’ll have two tackling beasts. Personally I don’t think he’s as bad as many on here think but do coincide he’s more down hill skier than match winner but having him and JUH in the same forward line is an exciting prospect for this old dog.I'd like Tippa too, but it would take a lot more than just him to satisfy the deal. He didn't have a fantastic 2020 and even so he would have been our second leading goalkicker with his 19. In 2019 he kicked 32 goals and had 18 goal assists, which means he'd have been second to Lloyd in goals, and third to Bont and Macrae in assists. He's been ranked in the top 10 for tackles inside 50 in the comp three years in a row.
No way should we be sending a first round pick to Collingwood for Treloar. If he’s prepared to renegotiate his contract then he’s doing Collingwood a massive favour to get the deal done. We don’t then reward the Pies with a first rounder.I’m all aboard the Treloar train now!!
Would happily renegotiate a 3-4 yr deal with him at $600k with Pies covering $1-150k.
Pretty much what our next Dunks contract would’ve cost us.
I’m also coming around to a 1st and AMT in a deal with the Bombers.
1st to Pies for Treloar and change for JUH, Dunks to Ess for future 1st and AMT, Martin pre season draft, Hannan 3rd, JUH with what’s left over this year.
Take 2 1sts in to next year and potentially use to bring in established player/s then.
Treloar
AMT
Martin
Hannan
JUH
Our list is improved by a fair way with those ins. It’s also shaken up a bit which probably needs to happen.
Not too much of a reach thinking those trades could get done imo.
No way should we be sending a first round pick to Collingwood for Treloar. If he’s prepared to renegotiate his contract then he’s doing Collingwood a massive favour to get the deal done. We don’t then reward the Pies with a first rounder.
I’d be annoyed if we handed over anymore than a 3rd rounder. He’s not a position of need and the Pies have backed themselves into a corner. Either we make out like bandits or move on to more pressing areas of concern.
Nothing to do with their board. Have not been there in a whileDo you spend your whole day reading the Essendon board?
I think it more complex than this board will admit toI absolutely agree with you.
To clarify, I do like Beveridge and think he’s a good coach.
I in fact should really withdraw making sarcastic comments like the one I did about Gowers.
But I find some of the things he’s been doing in the last few years extremely questionable.
I can’t stand our ruck strategy on two fronts:
1. English is clearly overworked and has been for a while, yet Beveridge and the MC refuse to play a second ruckman
2. playing midfielders like Dunkley and Macrae in the ruck is simply ridiculous. I wouldn’t mind our strategy in the ruck I’d say, English was off the ground, we play say Naughton, Bruce (who has been used well in the ruck), or even Cordy - players with actual height, as the spare or second ruck. Not pint sized midfielders like Macrae or Dunkley who are easily swatted aside by opponents larger and stronger than them.
I also can’t stand how Bevo has played favourites with the likes of Gowers, Gardner, Hayes after they’ve played stinkers (often several in a row) when better players like West, Young, even premiership player McLean gets dropped for the slightest drop in form and then either have to wait or don’t get a look in for weeks.
The situation with Dunkley - and I could be wrong - seems to me to have been a problem Bevo has contributed to.
There’s lots of conjecture out there and I don’t profess to knowing the full story about why he wants out, but he has been used ridiculously as a ruckman and not played as many minutes in the midfield and if he’s not happy about that, doesn’t take a genius to figure out who are the ones playing/not playing him in those roles.
I’d still prefer to keep any Treloar trade separate from screwing Essendon for Dunkley.No way should we be sending a first round pick to Collingwood for Treloar. If he’s prepared to renegotiate his contract then he’s doing Collingwood a massive favour to get the deal done. We don’t then reward the Pies with a first rounder.
I’d be annoyed if we handed over anymore than a 3rd rounder. He’s not a position of need and the Pies have backed themselves into a corner. Either we make out like bandits or move on to more pressing areas of concern.
Because fluke implies their was not much other than luck and that was clearly not the case when you win 4 finals on the trot 2 interstate 1 against the reigning premiers. A fluke would be something much less like a Stephen BradburyI loved the 2016 flag as much as the next arseh*le - but please look up the definition of a fluke.
“A surprising piece of luck.”
Given results before and after i’m not sure how you can say you’re certain it wasn’t a fluke.
Doesn’t mean we didn’t win the flag though.![]()
No current season stats available
I think it more complex than this board will admit to
1 with the rucks he clearly didn’t believe that Sweet was up to it and to play him and English means you are down a midfielder and that could have cost us games
2 the whole stop gap ruck was a tactical response to our lack of a 2nd ruck and we in fact won some of those games including against Melb who had a ruckman some posters said we should chase. Did it work everytime? No of course not but we needed to give English some respites and the tactic no different to what the Tigers did in 2017 where they effectively copied Bevos template. They changed when their ruck situation changed bu5 note they won with one ruckman this year
3 this whole favourites thing is overplayed. Coaches have their favourites because players do the right team thing and sometimes the team has a need that’s required. Players like you mention West are young and need that discipline reinforced and sometimes you get short term pain for long term gain.
The Dunks thing is a mystery but I will say this. If he is leaving because of lack of midfield or the occasional stints in the ruck (which btw is in the midfield) then he is not the leader or player we thought he was. The game he polled BOG in this year he played most of it forward.
If this is the real reason then I will drive him from the Whitten Oval avoiding the carpark pothole on the way out and push him out the door at the end of the Tulla where he can have all the easy midfield time he likes. If he wanted the midfield position back stop sooking and earn it back!
I’m sure a few of you wouldn’t mouth off at opposition fans in the stands like this.
if you aren’t prepared to do it there it’s not much use playing internet tough guy