Even in context, we should have been awarded far more HTB free kicks with perfectly executed tackles, especially in the last quarter.It's not damning at all without context. Were they all correct decisions? If not, which ones were blatantly wrong, how many were 50-50?
If he sees 16 free kicks for Sydney, is he expected to even the count up and just pay some to Essendon for nothing?
I bang on about it, but people seriously need to move on from "free kick count being equal = a well officiated game". Dumbest logic on BF and that is saying plenty...
It's not just the free kick count, it's what actually happened that matters. We had 36 tackles in the last quarter, many of which should have been HTB, including Cox's tackle on Hickey with 40 seconds to go. In fact, Hickey was caught HTB so many times tonight and it wasn't paid against him. Also the deliberate out of bounds rule was interpreted differently for Sydney and for us all night.
And blatant missed free kicks in front of goal too. So yeah, 16 free kicks to 1 by that umpire is atrocious in context.