- Apr 29, 2016
- 16,506
- 14,939
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
Stop peddling a false narrative.
You had already mentioned Grundy's marks, tackles and goal in previous posts. I'm not going to repeat them.
And goals are still important for a ruckman, so I'm not going to disparage Grundy's contribution in that regard.
Everybody values a different set of stats for a role, you are just emphasizing the wrong ones.
I don't care how many marks Grundy had. A ruckman's value is not as a link man. If he is to play that role in a particular team, so be it. But it typically minimises his output to a winger/flanker (and I don't really care how many marks a winger/flanker has either) compared to his principal role at the stoppages.
If you don't value marks or any work around the ground then it's you who is emphasising the wrong ones. Gawn is likely AA for just that, marks around the ground and contested marks as well. Gone are the days where rucks are asked to just do the hitouts and then do bugger all around the ground.
At the end of the day, Grundy was superior today and I believe Naitanui played a decent game but if you're saying that Naitanui beat Grundy and did it convincingly then you may as well say that Connor West should win the rising star while you're at it.





