Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. 2021 Trade & List Management Thread II - IN: CCJ

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

I don't see the reason for the angst about Hawthorn discussing trade for GC pick 19. I'm sure any club that thinks they can fit the salary dump would be enquiring.

If we needed to sweeten the deal more than taking the full salary dump and giving future 3rd, by using future 2nd instead, i'd rather call it off completely. As I've previously opined, i think Macpherson would be depth only, and don't think we should trade more than future 3rd. Our 2022 2nd round won't be far off pick 19, and every year there's excitement around players in that range. If more was required, I'd prefer upping the contracts of some youngsters instead of going ahead with the trade.
 
The anti-cap dump gear is baffling. It's one year.

We came into this year in a fantastic cap position. Probably best in the league.

We lock away a lot of talent for beyond 2023, then off more senior players - Walker, Tyson, Menadue, Garner, Tarrant, not to mention a chance Atley, Dumont and maybe one or two others get turfed too.

Going into a season with cap room you can temporarily fill with no long term consequences and get an amazing pick for it, you do that deal every single time. No brainer.

We are committing a rort here. Honestly it's down to the AFL turning a blind eye.

Is it really a rort though? I.e.Does this explicitly break any trading rules?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

The acurate one you've said we'll pick JHF at 1 and you've also said we'll bid on Daicos.

Why you ****ing with us bro?

Yep I did and we've changed out tune apparently. Can happen as you'd know nothing is set in stone. As comments are of the minute even though they remain on BF for eternity.

The prelim effort was enough to seal the deal.
 
Yep I did and we've changed out tune apparently. Can happen as you'd know nothing is set in stone. As comments are of the minute even though they remain on BF for eternity.

The prelim effort was enough to seal the deal.
It was a massive game.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

The idea that Cunnington has cost Trent his career as an on-baller is revisionism. Trent had most of 2020 to prove what he could do in the midfield without Cunnington and hardly covered himself in glory. He used to dominate VFL teams in the midfield but he isn't particularly strong, agile or clever compared to your average best 22 AFL midfielder. There's a reason why we use him on the wing and that's because he doesn't have the attributes of a high quality AFL midfielder.
2020 Wasnt exactly the stable of years within the scrotum.
 
Ok so we won't offer more than pick #38 for CCJ, will walk him otherwise. Jones will groomed to take over from Goldie.

We will now call JHF with the first as it's worth 10K to the kid and we now believe he is the best kid in the draft. Not sure I agree but anyways. Who cares what I think. Good job North for finishing last.

DMac and 19 for our fourth or third pick at best for GC. No second pick to be offered.

Damien Barrett:

North Melbourne: D+
 
Hadn’t checked the CCJ thread on the Richmond board for a few days… fair to say the tantrums reached new heights after Luffys interview.

I’ve never seen this type of carry on from any club about losing a non best 22 player.

Can’t work out if it is more hilarious or pathetic.

Is CCJ the player that Dimma forgot the name of mid season?

(Please be yes. There is footage of this)
 
Bloody hell, you'd want pick two to take on that contract.

Hawks are all talking about draft draft draft.... which is diff to Clarko times of ignoring the draft and topping up ie omea Mitchell wingard etc


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top