Remove this Banner Ad

Club Mgmt. Board of Directors as led by President Dave Barham - Statement from Barham addressing Merrett etc - 12/9

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lore
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
 
Last edited:
This really was amateur hour by Essendon. Is that what we do now? We sack coaches who have had one bad year? One. On what basis? Team performance they say? Uncompetitive in 5 or 6 games they say?

That may be true, but so what? How uncompetitive was Richmond in 2016 (13th with a percentage of 78%) Or Melbourne in 2019 (5 wins with a percentage of 78%). Richmond, remember lost by 120 points in the last round of 2016

BOTH those clubs could have used the old "we were uncompetitive in several games" excuse but they didn't. They realized that there is more to a football club than just the coach and they backed the coach.

Rutten had only been coach for 45 games and the first season we made the finals. And it's not like he had a 5 year contract. It was a three year contract. He only had one year left, and we had only struggled for one season. You always learn more from a bad season than you do from a good one. So give him the chance to learn from his mistakes. If the performances are still poor after two consecutive bad years then fine, move the coach on. But ONE bad year without giving him the opportunity to make amends and learn from it? Give me a break.

And not only that, the excuses from the club reek of the same illogical crap you hear from idiot supporters. "We were uncompetitive in several games, so we've taken this path". What do dumb supporters do? They say the same thing. They want to sack the coach. We all see them, we all hear them. They're idiots and we we tolerate them at work, and on bigfooty, but it is just ramblings from dumb supporters whenever any club has a bad loss. Yes, there are times to sack a coach, but not after one bad season

You'd expect the higher-ups at a football club would be a bit smarter, a bit more analytical, a bit more nuanced and thoughtful. Such as analyzing recent football history at other clubs and seeing what has worked. For example, they said we are on the lookout for a coach with senior coaching experience. Do these numbskulls realize that the the last 12 premierships have been won by clubs whose coach was in their first senior job? Do these numbskulls realize that 17 of the last 18 premierships have been won by clubs whose coach was in their first appointment? Do they realize that Essendon has ALREADY gone down that path with premiership coaches Thompson and Worsfold, and it didn't work out. Have they not analyzed the failures of Thompson and Worsfold at Essendon, Malthouse at Carlton, Pagan at Carlton, Blight and St.Kilda, Roos at Melbourne etc.

And then there the much needed external review. Why would you sack the coach before this? What if the review recommends keeping the coach? Isn't the whole point of the review to analyze all aspects of the club, including analyzing the people responsible for making the decisions about the coach?

What the hell have we just done? The people making these decisions have no idea. So insular, so stupid, so panicked, so impatient, so ignorant of what has been successful outside our club and what we can learn from those outside successes.

One of your best Dan.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Everyone was a rabble once. Pies, Cats, Tigers, Hawks

THE BIG BROOM needs to come out some need to fall on their sword

I’d be sharpening the broom and using it like a jousting stick.

Skewer the board and send them packing in one fell swoop like an old, saggy shish kabob.
 
So how can we get the club to reset? Any ideas on what we have to do? Feels as though it's met a critical mass and nothing has happened.
The boys club even know that the football public is onto them now.

Can we force the entire board to step down and re-stand for election?
 


He was an unimaginative, uninspired dolt but he was a strong personality and he absolutely nailed the shit out of that.

I remember thinking at the time it was an oddly philosophical thing for him to say because he usually gave absolutely nothing.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

This really was amateur hour by Essendon. Is that what we do now? We sack coaches who have had one bad year? One. On what basis? Team performance they say? Uncompetitive in 5 or 6 games they say?

That may be true, but so what? How uncompetitive was Richmond in 2016 (13th with a percentage of 78%) Or Melbourne in 2019 (5 wins with a percentage of 78%). Richmond, remember lost by 120 points in the last round of 2016

BOTH those clubs could have used the old "we were uncompetitive in several games" excuse but they didn't. They realized that there is more to a football club than just the coach and they backed the coach.

Rutten had only been coach for 45 games and the first season we made the finals. And it's not like he had a 5 year contract. It was a three year contract. He only had one year left, and we had only struggled for one season. You always learn more from a bad season than you do from a good one. So give him the chance to learn from his mistakes. If the performances are still poor after two consecutive bad years then fine, move the coach on. But ONE bad year without giving him the opportunity to make amends and learn from it? Give me a break.

And not only that, the excuses from the club reek of the same illogical crap you hear from idiot supporters. "We were uncompetitive in several games, so we've taken this path". What do dumb supporters do? They say the same thing. They want to sack the coach. We all see them, we all hear them. They're idiots and we we tolerate them at work, and on bigfooty, but it is just ramblings from dumb supporters whenever any club has a bad loss. Yes, there are times to sack a coach, but not after one bad season

You'd expect the higher-ups at a football club would be a bit smarter, a bit more analytical, a bit more nuanced and thoughtful. Such as analyzing recent football history at other clubs and seeing what has worked. For example, they said we are on the lookout for a coach with senior coaching experience. Do these numbskulls realize that the the last 12 premierships have been won by clubs whose coach was in their first senior job? Do these numbskulls realize that 17 of the last 18 premierships have been won by clubs whose coach was in their first appointment? Do they realize that Essendon has ALREADY gone down that path with premiership coaches Thompson and Worsfold, and it didn't work out. Have they not analyzed the failures of Thompson and Worsfold at Essendon, Malthouse at Carlton, Pagan at Carlton, Blight and St.Kilda, Roos at Melbourne etc.

And then there's the much needed external review. Why would you sack the coach before this? What if the review recommends keeping the coach? Isn't the whole point of the review to analyze all aspects of the club, including analyzing the people responsible for making the decisions about the coach?

What the hell have we just done? The people making these decisions have no idea. So insular, so stupid, so panicked, so impatient, so ignorant of what has been successful outside our club and what we can learn from those outside successes.
Exactly. Barham said “what are other clubs doing?” Apparently the review will be about what other successful clubs do. Then he proceeds to do the opposite of what other successful clubs do. Geelong, Richmond and Melbourne all stuck with their coaches. I don’t have high hopes for this review.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Is he on the pro-Hird faction with Sheedy and Dodoro?
He and Wellman are with Brasher and Allen, Sheedy flipped on them and went with Barham, Muir, Green, Hisgrove and O’Sullivan to form a new majority.
Can't read the article behind a pay wall, why is he considering leaving?
Dont know I can’t read it either, but if you’re quitting after a board coup that went against building sustained success and threw out the internal review that you were part of then I’d suggest that’s a big part of it… will wait for confirmation
 
The continual reference to the marquee games is the worst and most delusional bit of all. Like, stop admiring the view up your own arse and join us in the real world.

While we whistle to ourselves and count our Anzac Day, Dreamtime (aka the annual loss) and Country Game (lol) marquee games, other teams count their finals wins and flags won in the exact era we’ve monopolised these marquee games.

I’d very happily give up every single marquee slot in exchange for us being good. Without a second thought.

So don’t @ me, Essendon, about your marquee games, they’re ******* meaningless because all the marquee games in the world don’t stop you being shithouse.
Marquee games have essentially become an event for us to gift the opposition 4 points + percentage in front of 80K for them to win flags. They should be embarrassed to mention a marquee game we haven’t won since 2014!! And another marquee game that we win once every 4 years.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom