Remove this Banner Ad

AFL Player 20: Peter Wright - Club Leading Goalkicker!

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

This is what I think too.
He might take the 4 before they try to nail him to a cross ✝️ though
I mentioned earlier that this will be a s**t show, but I undersold it.
Geez some people can go on...
It's Peter Wright, not Ronnie Andrews ya *******s!
Then arises monday to play next week.
I like the strategy
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Not than I’m a fan, but came across a Wayne Carey feed in tik tok where he comes out very strongly in support of Wright.
waynecareytruthhurts
Eddie McGuire was also hugely in favor of wright and made some great points
I’m loving all the opposition fan discourse, can’t wait til one of their players cop this unfortunate scenerio
 
I think this is blown way out of proportions given the clear intent to protect himself while going for the ball.

A referral straight to the tribunal makes it seem worse than what it is. It's a contact sport and accidents happen.
Severe v high was line ball.
Given the attempt to engineer the siciliy outcome last week and Christians track record, im not surprised its where it is.
 
Eddie McGuire was also hugely in favor of wright and made some great points
I’m loving all the opposition fan discourse, can’t wait til one of their players cop this unfortunate scenerio
Half of me wants him to get off for the melts.
Other half wouldnt mind my boy caddy getting a chance
 
Is the club going to fight hard? Wright was running straight to the ball and Cunningham was the one running and angle and cut in front of him. The opposition booing him all night definitely has an influence on public reaction to the event.
Don't think they'll announce anything about it but you'd expect they'd fight as best they can. having 2MP in the side for an extra week could be a deciding factor at the end of the season.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

I think he was aiming to mark the ball but miscalculated how close he'd get to it to then realizing it was lower than 2m and needed to chest mark it, to then realizing that it was too late and since his arms were lowered for a chest mark it was already in a position to brace.

Also if you look at this angle you can see him push out an arm in a split second attempt to soften the blow/impact to/from Cunningham by applying an open hand against his body but wasn't enough.

656.png

Unfortunately even though it's clearly an isolated incident with no ill intent as it would be in any other match I think he may ultimately fall victim to the edge stuff which is sad for him and for the overly sensitive nature of the competition.
 
Protect yourself, it's that simple.
An old WAFL player told me the same thing - he said a few decades back when the ball went over your head you turned around and prepared to crumb rather than run back with the flight - that was abnormal. Hobbs last year who isn't without courage was running with the flight then stopped himself. Lucky he did because he could still be in a trauma unit as Oscar McInerney was coming through full tilt with a high knee. It was a smart thing to stop.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

This is basically the exact same thing as what happened with Wright. Difference is he didn't take a mark.

If he marks the ball then this isn't up for discussion.

 
Wright's has gone straight to the tribunal which means we need to say... something.

Redman was offered a week, to go to the tribunal you would have to think you can downgrade one of the below



Pretty hard to argue he didn't intend to hit Newcombe, or that he didn't hit him high IMO. So you're at trying to downgrade low impact from low to... low. As soon as it's high and intentional it's at least a week.

View attachment 1939072
Unless you're Heeney?
 
Does it make any difference to his defence that the ball was kicked by an Essendon player? If the ball wasn’t meant for Wright (ie kicked by a Swans player) then he is encroaching on Cunningham’s space. But because the pass was meant for him then Cunningham is encroaching on Wrigt’s space.

Perhaps, down the track, any right-of-way law would take into account the intended target. If you connect with an intended target front-on, regardless of whether or not you have eyes for the ball, it’s a free kick to the targeted player. The idea would be that, as in Wright’s situation, Cunningham would be more inclined to visualise the intended target before going for the ball and thus halt his foray into the path of Wright.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

AFL Player 20: Peter Wright - Club Leading Goalkicker!

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top