Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Log in to remove this Banner Ad
It's not cheap if they were both at each other, doesn't matter if the ball is there or not if they are engaging each otherI was but bakers act was low.
I hate the behind play hits, it's cheap.
make that high impact = 785Based on this and the state Farmer was in after it, it's at least reckless, medium impact, high contact = level 3 = 325+40%+155 = 610, no discount because clearly he didn't plead guilty, back in round 4 or 5 next year
It's not like Baker has been a good boy throughout his career.
Wasn't it Baker who ran from 10 meters away to belt a Richmond player off the ball then claimed he didn't remember the incident due to concussion at the time.![]()
7 weeks is about right.
Nathan Buckley was right when he said that punch someone behind play was just about the lowest and most despicable act a player could committ on a football field.
Steven Baker
YOU ARE SCUM![]()
So what was the final ruling?
7 weeks is about right.
Nathan Buckley was right when he said that punch someone behind play was just about the lowest and most despicable act a player could committ on a football field.
Steven Baker
YOU ARE SCUM![]()


