Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Yeh if it were up to me I'd scrap emergencies altogether
I've only fallen back from 900 odd to 1100 too. Appears as if plenty got bitten by the defender rookie stitch ups.
I think that would be too low variance. Come post byes teams would be far too template for it to be enjoyable. It would be so very AFL Fantasy to follow the AFL and rather than fix the underlying problem (remove the sub rule), they try and tack on a half assed, ill thought out solution that will create longer lasting negative impacts.
The choice which card is either skill orYou can only play the cards you're dealt
Ted Clohesy has been a late in 3 times this year already, and named sub. That's one way to name a sub without making them feel bad. Just leave them out of the team altogether and when they get the late in, they're probably grateful to be named sub.Trusted Geelong
You can't see the details of their trades until the later of the player that they have traded out, or the player they have traded in, has played. So even if they traded say Clohesy to Daicos, it will look like Clohesy is in their side with the VC all week until Clohesy plays. Vice versa, if someone has traded say Ned Long to Holmes, it will look like Ned Long is in their side until Holmes' game starts. It's because of the edit trade function which now means players can change their trade ins / outs, until both are locked, so it doesn't show you what's actually happened until both have played.
Can they **** off? 14 points lost at half time isn't ****ing ideal
It would take you longer to get a "full squad" though as you would be completing 2 extra upgrades per position. I doubt many teams (except for the very top) would end up with 30 premiums.
