It really isn’t.Win, lose or draw these changes are borderline embarassing. A concerning insight into the minds of the MC.
There’s no depth at Peel other than NOD and McDonald.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
It really isn’t.Win, lose or draw these changes are borderline embarassing. A concerning insight into the minds of the MC.
Ok.It really isn’t.
There’s no depth at Peel other than NOD and McDonald.
Simpson and Dudley vs Fyfe and Darcy…Super quick ?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
The forecast weather on the GC makes it even weirder. 2 rucks in the dry is interesting, 2 rucks in the wet is suicide.I agree. It's almost like JLo doesn't like being an AFL Senior Coach. Bizarre team selection.
You don’t play two rucks in a torrential downpour either…Have you seen the weather forecast for this week? No one's running anyone off the park.
Must be a mutual suicide pact then..The forecast weather on the GC makes it even weirder. 2 rucks in the dry is interesting, 2 rucks in the wet is suicide.
And those are the two blokes I would’ve played…It really isn’t.
There’s no depth at Peel other than NOD and McDonald.
Well they’re as deluded as us…
Are they underdone and unfit too?
Aish.I'm genuinely curious who people think should have come in for Dudley?
Delean and Carr aren't ready, O'Driscoll, Sturt and Walters are injured, Nicholls and Riddle are KPFs (and aren't ready).
Given the reaction that's greeted the return of a two-time brownlow medallist and former best and fairest winner I'm going to hazard a guess that shifting Banners forward isn't an option people were prepared to entertain.
What are you proposing instead?
You can’t really be planning your subs like that… if something like last week happens all of that goes out the window. It is why Banfield is an excellent sub, as he’s very adaptable.Who we tipping to be sub? My prediction is Fyfe to be subbed in for Darcy at the end of the third qtr. The fact that Voss is still playing suggests that JL has planned for Darcy to get subbed out from the beginning. If this happens then we will be playing with either one less small defender or one less small forward. I think Wagner/Banfield goes back and we roll with Bolton/Fred/Reid/Switta as our small fwds. I reckon this gives us the best balance from the side named.
yeah it's extremely risky and as you say, another early injury like last week and we're in a world of trouble. I'm just trying to make sense of it all.You can’t really be planning your subs like that… if something like last week happens all of that goes out the window. It is why Banfield is an excellent sub, as he’s very adaptable.
I think Fyfe will be the sub as well, but if the plan is to sub Darcy after 2 and a half quarters, that just proves he isn’t fit enough.
Maybe Banners up forward with Aish to half backI'm genuinely curious who people think should have come in for Dudley?
Delean and Carr aren't ready, O'Driscoll, Sturt and Walters are injured, Nicholls and Riddle are KPFs (and aren't ready).
Given the reaction that's greeted the return of a two-time brownlow medallist and former best and fairest winner I'm going to hazard a guess that shifting Banners forward isn't an option people were prepared to entertain.
What are you proposing instead?
Banners covers DudleyMaybe Banners up forward with Aish to half back
Farkn hell you're going absolutely troppo. What a performance.We aren’t winning with this team.. no disrespect to Fyfe or Darcy, but we’ll be playing a man down. Neither are match fit.