Remove this Banner Ad

Mega Thread Port Forum General AFL Thread Part 30

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
The fact that Chris Davies hand feeds Caroline Wilson confidential information is more of an issue than the SCG turf.

I don't see the issue with making this instance public as it makes the AFL look pretty much as we all know it to be, a rabble behind the scenes.
 
Legendary South Australian football identity Ian Day has died, aged 90.
A member of South Adelaide’s last SANFL premiership team in 1964, Day is a SANFL Hall of Fame member who was a fine rover for the Panthers and West Adelaide from 1952-64.
That's so very sad.

I knew Ian well as we worked for the same boss but different businesses.

He was a genuinely nice bloke.

RIP Ian.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Legendary South Australian football identity Ian Day has died, aged 90.
A member of South Adelaide’s last SANFL premiership team in 1964, Day is a SANFL Hall of Fame member who was a fine rover for the Panthers and West Adelaide from 1952-64.
One of the voices of my youth. He and Peter Marker doing the ressies... brings me right back
 
The AFL has told clubs players who are repeatedly charged for careless umpire contact will be sent directly to the tribunal for possible suspensions.
What does repeatedly mean? Is that like Tom Lynch being repeatedly fined for striking yet never being banned?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

What does repeatedly mean? Is that like Tom Lynch being repeatedly fined for striking yet never being banned?

As of the start of round 17 on Thursday evening, players who are cited for careless umpire contact four or more times in a two-year period will likely be referred directly to the Tribunal.

Gold Coast's Matt Rowell (four), St Kilda's Jack Macrae (four) and Carlton's Adam Cerra (three) are among the current players who have been cited three or more times for careless umpire contact in the past two years.

 
As of the start of round 17 on Thursday evening, players who are cited for careless umpire contact four or more times in a two-year period will likely be referred directly to the Tribunal.

Gold Coast's Matt Rowell (four), St Kilda's Jack Macrae (four) and Carlton's Adam Cerra (three) are among the current players who have been cited three or more times for careless umpire contact in the past two years.

I saw an in game free kick for careless umpire contact for the first time a few weeks ago. Ridiculous.

I actually prefer the approach of sorting it out with post match sanctions.
 
The AFL has told clubs players who are repeatedly charged for careless umpire contact will be sent directly to the tribunal for possible suspensions.
The AFL has told non- Vic clubs, players who are repeatedly charged for careless umpire contact will be sent directly to the tribunal for possible suspensions.

Just fixed that for you.
 
As of the start of round 17 on Thursday evening, players who are cited for careless umpire contact four or more times in a two-year period will likely be referred directly to the Tribunal.

Gold Coast's Matt Rowell (four), St Kilda's Jack Macrae (four) and Carlton's Adam Cerra (three) are among the current players who have been cited three or more times for careless umpire contact in the past two years.


This just reinforces my belief this league is a joke. This is not in the top 100 for things that need to be looked at, and bringing in changes mid-season always reeks of amateurism.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

As of the start of round 17 on Thursday evening, players who are cited for careless umpire contact four or more times in a two-year period will likely be referred directly to the Tribunal.

Gold Coast's Matt Rowell (four), St Kilda's Jack Macrae (four) and Carlton's Adam Cerra (three) are among the current players who have been cited three or more times for careless umpire contact in the past two years.


I wonder if they're also keeping tabs on whether this keeps happening to any particular umpires more than others. Careful what yo ask for, dudes...
 
Jane Lomax-Smith gives the crows a little clip in her op-ed piece in In Daily



Whilst she's right about the Crows trying to free load, the rest is largely bullshit. Adelaide council has been anti-development since I was a boy. FFS the North Adelaide Le Cornu site is only going to finish this year, after 36 years since it stopped being a furniture store. Development proposal after development proposal was turned down. And the parklands look like you've gone out bush in the parts that aren't half dead grass ovals of some sort.

Whilst I'm not a big fan of Melbourne (the City), Fitzroy Gardens there shits all over any part of the parklands. If all the non-sporting parts of the parklands were like that, then it'd be something to actually be a drawcard, rather than some blessed scrub in the city.
 
Whilst she's right about the Crows trying to free load, the rest is largely bullshit. Adelaide council has been anti-development since I was a boy. FFS the North Adelaide Le Cornu site is only going to finish this year, after 36 years since it stopped being a furniture store. Development proposal after development proposal was turned down.
Not all the proposal were turned down at all - in fact almost all of the submitted proposals got approved but were rejected on subsequent amendments to the original proposals or the developer (Makris Group) seeking extensions or simply not proceeding with their own project proposals.


It took the project site being determined as a major development project with the support of the State Government and ACC for development on the site to finally become a reality.

 
Whilst she's right about the Crows trying to free load, the rest is largely bullshit. Adelaide council has been anti-development since I was a boy. FFS the North Adelaide Le Cornu site is only going to finish this year, after 36 years since it stopped being a furniture store. Development proposal after development proposal was turned down. And the parklands look like you've gone out bush in the parts that aren't half dead grass ovals of some sort.

Whilst I'm not a big fan of Melbourne (the City), Fitzroy Gardens there shits all over any part of the parklands. If all the non-sporting parts of the parklands were like that, then it'd be something to actually be a drawcard, rather than some blessed scrub in the city.

The Le Cornu site is actually not the poster child for the ACC's undoubted intransigence. Plans were approved, even before SAG had 'major development' intervention power. A few times, blatant disregard of pre-approved limits or of what had been approved halted things. At one point a cynical overblown plan aimed at getting a SAG override - rightly rejected. Other times broader economic currents derailed the developers/finance de jour. In the end council itself took charge.

Yes the Crows are entitled freeloaders. Bring back the Cows by the North Adelaide train station, they only left in 1972!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top