It's like a professional ballplayer immediately and automatically putting up his arm pleading for a penalty or foul to be called regardless of the actuality or obviousness showing otherwise. They just do it, shamelessly.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty AFLW Notice Img
AFLW 2025 - AFLW Trade and Draft - All the player moves
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
That's the elephant in the room.It could turn nasty for the Crows.Their sponsors would be thrilled right about now
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
No I didn’t/don’t want them to win shit, there has always been an unearned arrogance and self entitlement to the Crows that gives me the absolute shits.I know a lot of people who had a soft spot for Crom and wanted a Crom flag and thats all vanished because instead of just accepting the penalty, which is a legit penalty, they are pulling this shit.
I did start to feel a bit sorry for them after they'd moved on from collective minds and were still struggling but their management hasn't learnedNo I didn’t/don’t want them to win shit, there has always been an unearned arrogance and self entitlement to the Crows that gives me the absolute shits.
Their BF board is full of conflicting yobbos. Some want it over and done with, some agreeing and putting up extremely valid points around homophobia and what rights the community had up to only recently, then there’s a significant amount of brain dead morons with a massive chip on their shoulders to the weight of the ‘bias Victorian media’ and the ‘VFL HQ’.But their captain said Rankine, and the club, would cop whatever punishment was handed out.
Now they're back-tracking.
That's the elephant in the room.It could turn nasty for the Crows.
It’s worse for sponsors in a drawn out scenario, especially national types.The AFL should have just given him 5 weeks on Monday in line with all the other sanctions and let the Crows play it out in public if they dared instead of entertaining them behind the scenes. Weak leadership from the AFL.
Sloane from all reports was a very good leader not sure about the rest of the organization thoughIt is surely no coincidence that you get the likes of Tex and Rankine playing (and playing up) at this football club when you consider the kind of leadership that must be in place there. All evasion and no ownership. Protect the player and punt the principle. It's clearly the ideal environment for 'good bloke' culture and 'just a brain fade, nothing to see here' equivocations about everything.
Pretty impressive that a club playing in the national competition in 2025 can still mire themselves in a culture that would have done 80's country footy proud.
#neverchangecamrys
I've definitely read much the same about Sloane. But I'd suggest that this current incident underlines my conviction that we can be fairly sure about the quality of leadership across the wider organisation at this point.Sloane from all reports was a very good leader not sure about the rest of the organization though
Amidst all of this someone has forgotten to mention that Port tried this exact defence last year with the Houston/Rankine incident:
Tribunal: "We do not consider the consequence of missing finals and potentially a grand final impacts the sanction that should be imposed"
Yes. Off with his head and move on.The AFL should have just given him 5 weeks on Monday in line with all the other sanctions and let the Crows play it out in public if they dared instead of entertaining them behind the scenes. Weak leadership from the AFL.
Sloane from all reports was a very good leader not sure about the rest of the organization though
https://www.beyondblue.org.au/Anyone else having flashbacks to 2013 (Chapman) and 2019 (Hawkins)?
Surely you jest. I'm continually reminded by the footy media that the Cats 'whine' every year about not playing finals at their home ground, a privilege that is afforded to every other club in the competition apart from ours.Interesting thing about our club; I don't recall us ever sooking it up. Must be one of the few who don't.
A very meta answerSurely you jest. I'm continually reminded by the footy media that the Cats 'whine' every year about not playing finals at their home ground, a privilege that is afforded to every other club in the competition apart from ours.
Yet somehow it's apparently our fault that we can routinely point to a clear inequity in the finals fixture. More than that, we have the arrogance to note the double standard and not just accept the 'rules for some' approach of the AFL. Which in this case is actually 'rules for everyone, apart from Geelong', of course.
This 'pathetic whining' may just get another run in the next few weeks. And, if it does, it will be less than a couple of nanoseconds (rounding up) before many in the footy world are out to ridicule the club and to tell us to get back in our box. So don't bother asking anyone outside of the GFC whether they ever see the Cats sooking it up. You won't even be waiting an instant to hear their (spurious) answer.