If they did it would also imply we could get two picks for TDK alone - a band one and whatever band the extra points is worth, which was never going to happenI doubt they apply it that way
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
If they did it would also imply we could get two picks for TDK alone - a band one and whatever band the extra points is worth, which was never going to happenI doubt they apply it that way
Don't use the sprinkler... it might look cool, but it also makes you look like a try hard.The 'fishing rod' or 'lasoo' are also options.
Exactly what dogs are doing keeping saints honest with an increased offer for Wilkie.If Brisbane want to keep him they're going to have to improve their offer.
This is happening at the same time as Brisbane locking onto at least one significant money target from *.
Regardless, if they get Bailey then they've got a damn good player.
I heard that as wellI can tell you that as good a theory as that it is it was driven by Jack.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Curnow is 28, and there's no suggestion he won't at least have another 4-5 years left (Jeremey Cameron is 32, for example, and had a similar dip at the same age). Even if he 'only' repeats 2025 (playing largely as a lone forward in an injury-riddle team) he would still be the Swans second highest goal-scorer (behind Heeney) and an upgrade on their current options. At best he's a Coleman medal winner and a game-breaking star, who is also extremely marketable
For Carlton, whatever we receive has to factor in a) Charlie is the favourite of almost all the kiddies out there, and b) any pick in the 10-20 range is going to get used on a F/S who we will get regardless.
From Carlton's POV, you absolutely can't walk out of this and tell 50,000 primary school kids that their hero basically got traded straight-up for Ollie Florent. You just can't - not when Jack Silvagni left, and TDK, and the team missed the finals.
For Sydney, it then becomes whether they think the risk is worth it.
I've said elsewhere that I think it's probably hard for Sydney, and impossible for Geelong. I think if it is Sydney it has to be something like:
- we get their first round pick, and are maybe able to package this with SOS and TDK compensation to ensure we get two picks + Dean in the top 20.
- we get both depth and a 'feature' player back the other way.
For the feature player - we have to have someone you can point out to the kids and say 'we got that guy'. Papley is that, but clearly seems off the table. Blakey/Heeney/Warner/Gulden = dreaming. I think feature player has to be one of McInerney/Hayward/Logan McDonald/McCartin or as a dark horse, Mills (who has been injured and slipped... enough).
Then we need depth - I'd like to see us push for 1-2 fringe players who just can't fit into a Sydney team that has a couple of academy players, plenty of both young and old guys, etc. Guys who can play for us, but won't for them.
Right now that would be from a list that is something like: Corey Warner, Harry Cunningham, Sam Wicks, Angus Sheldrick, Ollie Florent, Jake Lloyd, Matt Roberts, or an unknown like Will Green (19yo ruck taken at pick 16 a couple of years ago).
Based on that, I think the minimum I think passes for us has to be:
- Sydney first round + Will Hayward + Sam Wicks
That's your 'things are just unresolvable with Charlie'
What I'd hope for would be:
- Sydney first round (pick 12) + McInerney + Sheldrick + Florent
Sydney is probably jumping at the first (subject to players of course). The latter? I mean, it's CHARLIE CURNOW. He turns arguably the Swans weakest position into a strength, puts them into premiership contention, and its giving up their fifth best wing/midfielder, a pick that will slide as far as 15, and some steak knives?
I am actually fairly comfortable with letting Wright & Davies decide who stays & who goes as both have exceptional resume's in the industry.
I understand supporter angst around losing TDK, Jack & maybe Charlie, but it might be the catalyst we need to move on as a club & raise the bar of standards with the playing group.
No current season stats available
What happened with Lemmey plays no role in the Charlie decision. That'd be like saying we delisted Cincotta so we can't trade Cripps.Delisting lemme and trading CC would mean we need to trade in a kpf. If we can't do that, then the CC trade won't happen.
Hello, I, like many other non-blues supporters like to follow the best run thread on the site, the Bluemours thread. I find offering Reidy three years staggering, equally more staggering if we tried to keep him...Liam Reidy Freo agreed to terms with us. 3 year offer
Maybe we think we're getting Harley and Reidy is just his nicknameHello, I, like many other non-blues supporters like to follow the best run thread on the site, the Bluemours thread. I find offering Reidy three years staggering, equally more staggering if we tried to keep him...
Are you for real? apologies for a little age-related Sesame Street lineHello, I, like many other non-blues supporters like to follow the best run thread on the site, the Bluemours thread. I find offering Reidy three years staggering, equally more staggering if we tried to keep him...

Liam Reidy seems a bit … “meh” I get Sam Rowe vibes with how he plays as a forward.
Tell me he’s at least better and more versatile than Pitto..
Liam Reidy Freo agreed to terms with us. 3 year offer