Lore
Moderator ❀
- Dec 14, 2015
- 48,904
- 73,289
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Moderator
- #10,220
There we go, that's the clip:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty AFLW Notice Img
AFLW 2025 - AFLW Trade and Draft - All the player moves
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
He has to want to go to Essendon.Or Hawks offer pick 8 and Cam McKenzie for Merret
If the club can sell him why he's a good fit it wont matter how we are perceived as a clubHe has to want to go to Essendon.
That might be a little hiccup in your plan.
Sure.If the club can sell him why he's a good fit it wont matter
Didn’t he quell the noise only a few weeks ago. How many more times does he have to come out and deny it if it’s not true..?If it aint, the noise has been loud the past week or two and we certainly havnt heard anything from Zac himself
So he needs to quell the speculation and noise. It cant help with guys like Ridley ect ect
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Pick 7 for McKenzie then Hawks on trade 7+8 to Essendon for Merret?Sure.
He was also a stkilda NGA who we wanted but weren’t allowed to draft due to rules and we still want him now.
I’d imagine if he gets put on the table. He is coming to us as a local Beaumaris boy as opposed to heading to Essendon.
There are zero reports linking him to you. There are plenty linking us including Caroline Wilson yesterday 6/9 in the age.
My issue with this, is that if that’s the cost for McKenzie. What’s the cost for Windhager?Pick 7 for McKenzie then Hawks on trade 7+8 to Essendon for Merret?
At the end of the day I don't see a trade happening this is another Petracca scenario IMOMy issue with this, is that if that’s the cost for McKenzie. What’s the cost for Windhager?
In my eyes, it’s hard to see how they aren’t similar value.
Or it could be the Windhager pick which is likely mid teens.
Why would Hawthorn give up Cam McKenzie though? Not when he’s contracted and have bugger all depth in the middle. There is no reason he couldn’t come on next year like Josh Ward and help propel us into flag contention.We want Cam McKenzie. Have a first and likely more with Marshall and Windhager dangling about.
We could easily be the third party that helps this trade happen as we have the draft currency.
Where did he quell it?Didn’t he quell the noise only a few weeks ago. How many more times does he have to come out and deny it if it’s not true..?
On the contrary, if it is true, well no wonder he is laying low.
In a weak draft Hawthorn is not trading McKenzie, with years of development, for pick 7. It’s laughable to think that Hawthorn would offload two top 10 picks for a 30 year old Merrett.Pick 7 for McKenzie then Hawks on trade 7+8 to Essendon for Merret?
If he asked for a trade out, which some say hed like to be getting games and saints are obviousily linked so they think his head can be potentially be turnedWhy would Hawthorn give up Cam McKenzie though? Not when he’s contracted and have bugger all depth in the middle. There is no reason he couldn’t come on next year like Josh Ward and help propel us into flag contention.
Cam McKenzie is a top 10 pick that is in the sweet spot for our list development — which I gather is why the Saints want him too.
Or Hawthorn could just hold him to his contract that he signed last year. A top 4 contending Hawthorn playing at the MCG every second week is a far more attractive destination than St Kilda — and he’ll get those games when Worpel leaves.If he asked for a trade out, which some say hed like to be getting games and saints are obviousily linked so they think his head can be potentially be turned
Hawks could also push him out if its the deciding factor in getting Zerrett
Zerrett and Will day added to the current side replacing Worpel
Typically played a pretty tight 4, so whether Ward/Nash holds and play 5
He would leave for game timeOr Hawthorn could just hold him to his contract that he signed last year. A top 4 contending Hawthorn playing at the MCG every second week is a far more attractive destination than St Kilda — and he’ll get those games when Worpel leaves.
Why would he leave Hawthorn and embrace ‘Saints footy’ in front of an half empty Marvel instead?
Not sure I like the idea of throwing away first round picks that have 40-60 games and are in the early 20 sweet spot for 30 year olds on the decline. There is enough future picks that can get that deal done if need be without giving up McKenzie…
he has a point, if you want out, just go, the trade rumors for the last few years do no one any favors, esp himselfMate, he's been busting his ass for 12 years and Dons won't play finals for at least another 3 years. Most likely 4-5 being realistic
He hung in there for a long time. Can't blame him wanting out to a contender if true at 30
Main issue for Bombers is trying to capitalise in a shite draft
But a top 10 pick plus a good kid could be huge for your rebuild
McKenzie won’t be going anywhereIf he asked for a trade out, which some say hed like to be getting games and saints are obviousily linked so they think his head can be potentially be turned
Hawks could also push him out if its the deciding factor in getting Zerrett
Zerrett and Will day added to the current side replacing Worpel
Typically played a pretty tight 4, so whether Ward/Nash holds and play 5
In a weak draft Hawthorn is not trading McKenzie, with years of development, for pick 7. It’s laughable to think that Hawthorn would offload two top 10 picks for a 30 year old Merrett.
I’d rather shoot for the likes of Zac Bailey and undercut the Dons as a far, far more attractive destination.
In this hypothetical you aren't giving 2 top 10 picks...........
The picks are diluted from early access rights. Pick 8 ends up being pick 14 or something like that, not to mention the draft is supposedly not very good anyway.
There is no way Essendon are giving up their best player, with 2 years to run on his contract unless we get a very very good deal. If all it took to get Merrett was a a late first round pick 3/4 of the comp would be into him rofl.
I know my clubs dumb, but I have faith they are not that dumb.
Not a bad fit for us at face value. Good to see the club knows what it needs at leastBombers have spoken to Husswaite, and like Serong.
They can forget about Frenchy.
In this hypothetical you aren't giving 2 top 10 picks...........
The picks are diluted from early access rights. Pick 8 ends up being pick 14 or something like that, not to mention the draft is supposedly not very good anyway.
There is no way Essendon are giving up their best player, with 2 years to run on his contract unless we get a very very good deal.
If all it took to get Merrett was a late first round pick 3/4 of the comp would be into him rofl.
I know my clubs dumb, but I have faith they are not that dumb.
Uwland, Patterson and Annable will all definitely be bid on before, and Harry Dean likely as well. Not to mention the Allen and Draper compo picks.Sorry haven't been following in draft that closely, who are the academy players that are likely to be bid on before pick 8?
Just trying to figure out if some of the comments are exaggerated, I know of Uwland who else?
WC, Richmond and Essendon hold the top 5 picks maybe top 6, then Saints, Suns and Hawks. The suns will need to trade that pick otherwise it's getting absorbed by the Uwland bid.