Remove this Banner Ad

Rumour Bluemour Discussion XXXIX

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
LWhitehead & Hogg, Rice & Hanna had the flexibility for matchups too…

I watched the replay of the 1995 QF the other day. And had to replay Dean Rice’s hit on Chris Scott a few times, it looked like Rice barely touched Scott and somehow still knocked him into next week. 😂
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Yes but what if we had a deal directly with WCE. Does Charlie refuse or go?
He refuses. West Coast are the worst AFL team in history. I also seriously doubt that Graham Wright and co would even waste their time coming up with trade packages to get Charlie Curnow to WC.
 
Last edited:
What are we thinking re: Binns? Is he considered not up to afl standard? Or worth persisting with?
I think he has next to 0 chance of becoming a good player. I get his strength is his outside game and running ability, but he's contested work is not at AFL standard. You still need to have some sort of ability in any contested situation. Maybe I have randomly missed seeing this.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

l believe the probability is higher gaining a few high draft picks.
l don't see Geelong & Sydney or Gold Coast giving up a A grade player.
I don’t see us trading a contracted superstar for draft picks (especially when we’ve got highly rated FSs the next 2 years).
It would be a shocking look for the club, and significantly increase the pressure on Voss in the last year of his contract.
 
I don’t see us trading a contracted superstar for draft picks (especially when we’ve got highly rated FSs the next 2 years).
It would be a shocking look for the club, and significantly increase the pressure on Voss in the last year of his contract.
l agree but if it also depend on how Wright rates the list, if he is of the view we are a few years away with the right decisions l would not completely dismiss pick 2 involving multiple clubs being considered.
 
l agree but if it also depend on how Wright rates the list, if he is of the view we are a few years away with the right decisions l would not completely dismiss pick 2 involving multiple clubs being considered.
It would be a massive about face not only on public comments, but on those leaked to the media as well.
It would look terrible, and not be a good way to hold the faith of the members.
 
It would be a massive about face not only on public comments, but on those leaked to the media as well.
It would look terrible, and not be a good way to hold the faith of the members.
lt would seem unlikely but who knows if someone presents a very attractive deal in our favour it may be considered.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Yes but what if we had a deal directly with WCE. Does Charlie refuse or go?
Cant remember the last time a player that didn't want to be traded interstate, was traded interstate

Maybe our josh kennedy?
 
lt would seem unlikely but who knows if someone presents a very attractive deal in our favour it may be considered.
But that’s the thing, a “very attractive deal in our favour” is going to include a gun player as the main part of the trade.
Draft picks are going to be additions, not the main course, or it’s not going to be very attractive.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top