He's strong and powerful I wouldnt say he is fast.
I dont see him out running too many other AFL midfielders beyond 20m
How far do you want him to run? Most of the speed required is in the first 5-10.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
He's strong and powerful I wouldnt say he is fast.
I dont see him out running too many other AFL midfielders beyond 20m
Poor Lachie Neale might as well hang up his boots now.
Not to say McGuane is the next Neale, just that there is a whole lot of mayo applied to this complaint.
SSP players with size or speed usually have significant flaws, like disposal or footy IQ.
There's no point taking another Ronin O'Connor type (big but can't find the football) or an Anthony Wilson (fast but that was it)
Posted this yesterday. Thought the discrepancy between DE and KE looked weird especially because his kicking passes the eye test so did some sums - for it to work he’d need 108% handball efficiency so it just can’t be right.2025 VFL averages for Zac Foot according to wheelo
24 disposals (14.5k, 9.5hb) at 79% DE, 60% KE
5.3 I50
27% Contested possession
2.7 clearances
7 marks
3.3 score involvements
3.2 tackles
28 goals in 21 games
Looks like a pretty damaging profile as an outside mid (although the kicking efficiency looks low).
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
If he was 0.06 seconds faster he'd be in the top 10 of all time.I am by no means saying he's slow.
I'm just saying that testing isn't always an indication of actual game speed.
Let's look at the 20m sprint which is what was being spoken about.
This is the top 10 according to google.
Fastest recorded times
Joel Wilkinson: 2.75 seconds (2010)
Jonathan Marsh: 2.78 seconds (2013)
Reef McInnes: 2.78 seconds (2020)
Danyle Pearce: 2.79 seconds (2004)
Ashley Smith: 2.80 seconds (2008)
Edward Allan: 2.81 seconds (2022)
Aiden O'Driscoll: 2.871 seconds (2023)
Max Holmes: 2.80 seconds (2020)
Liam Kolar: 2.87 seconds (2020)
Isiah Winder: 2.873 seconds (2020)
His 2.93 is fast, but not at the upper echelons of the sprint testing but I guarantee on field he will play much faster than most of the people in that top 10.
I don't know what the top 20 is, but I doubt he would be in that, but you'd swear he's one of the quickest players we've ever had.
Interestingly McLeod had the exact same 20m sprint time.
Mitch Stevens looks to have recorded a 2.885 and as previously mentioned I think McGuane has done a similar 2.938.
i just think the way you think on field has an influence in terms how quick you play which is supported by your god given abilities. Rankine wouldn't necessarily win a straight line race against the elite runners, but on a footy field you would absolutely fear his speed.
I think the opposite. The last spot or 2 should be for the hail Mary’s. An Ollie Wines type that busts through packs but shins it forward or completely misses his hand when hand balling. A speedy guy that with good disposal that always runs to the wrong spots.
Fix the critical flaw and you’ve got a difference maker. Go the other way and you peak at depth to sit alongside your other 2-3 year in second and third rounders waiting for a handful of injuries. What’s the point?
There’s always a knock.I'd rather go the other way. Take the player with extreme football IQ and/or elite ball use that isn't quite at the modern physical profile of an AFL player. Maybe a bit short, seen as too slow, poor endurance, whatever.
Players with size or pace but have no footy IQ will never make it no matter how much time you put in.
We've already got Taylor.I'd rather go the other way. Take the player with extreme football IQ and/or elite ball use that isn't quite at the modern physical profile of an AFL player. Maybe a bit short, seen as too slow, poor endurance, whatever.
Players with size or pace but have no footy IQ will never make it no matter how much time you put in.
Except McGuanne is quite quick and is a very powerful runner. His 6.20 2km at the combine would put him quite high in our 2km run if he was to compete.We've already got Taylor.![]()
He would probably lap Taylor lol.Except McGuanne is quite quick and is a very powerful runner. His 6.20 2km at the combine would put him quite high in our 2km run if he was to compete.
Well one things for sure if that footage Josh Money posted is any guide he's no shrinking violet and he wants to be on an AFL list real baaaad.He would probably lap Taylor lol.
(I still like Zac though)
If you couple with reading the ball etc then with his pace he is extra fast and that is what he does.If he was 0.06 seconds faster he'd be in the top 10 of all time.
Thats 60 milliseconds. Like, a 16th of a second. At an olympic sprinters max speed (which those guys probably don't hit in only 20m?) we're talking somewhere in the realm of 20 centimeters ahead.
I don't know how they actually measure it, but just being unlucky in your stride, or sticking your hand out would easily double or triple that distance.
What are we talking about here? I'm not sure what we're arguing about. Rankine is fast as all hell.
How much does this even matter? What you really want is the Andrew McLeod, Charlie Cameron type movement. Insane acceleration for your first few steps, putting you out of arms reach.
In possession of the ball maybe but not without the footy.How far do you want him to run? Most of the speed required is in the first 5-10.
Yes. Actually, from inside the club (Edwards), it was openly stated to the players that Ludo was the very next in our talent order after Marsh. We did not believe that he slid to 50, LOL."Having attempted to get up the ranks, the Crows' pick finally rolled around and they decided on forward Mitch Marsh, who edged out Archie Ludowyke for the spot (the Crows later landed on Ludowyke, who was surprisingly still available at pick 50 on night two)."
This might be the only time in draft history where "oh yeah, they were our second choice" is true for a pick ~25-30 players down the order.
Not too many, but not none, eitherI'm going to go out on a limb and say that most train-on invitation players will have a weakness of some kind
Not too many blue chippers floating around the country and ammo leagues
I heard this and now it's been said publicly on the welcome draftees video my question is this.Yes. Actually, from inside the club (Edwards), it was openly stated to the players that Ludo was the very next in our talent order after Marsh. We did not believe that he slid to 50, LOL.
I assume they don't need to take up our invitation - would take a big punt to move to Adelaide on the hope he might get a rookie spotLooks like he had a decent season, played a heap of different positions as well
Totals:
View attachment 2485352
Averages:
View attachment 2485355
VFL Team of the year on a HFF and 19th in the VFL BnF voting
Well there was absolutely no doubt the Swans were going to match at that point in the draft.I heard this and now it's been said publicly on the welcome draftees video my question is this.
Why did we bid on Max King, then?