Prediction 2026 New Jumper numbers.

[BillyElliott]

It’s hilarious that 34 looks like remaining vacant. Is the club trolling us?

Perhaps we have plans/hopes to draft him next year after another year of development.

 

[Jen2310]

I was wrong on Buller. So nobody taking 6?

Unless it’s a normal player

 

[Harry O]

I was wrong on Buller. So nobody taking 6?

Unless it’s a normal player

View attachment 2485341View attachment 2485342

6 kept vacant for Patto Jnr next season

 

[Pragmatic Shill]

6 is being kept for Bailey Humphrey

 

[Jen2310]

6 kept vacant for Patto Jnr next season

Would be nice.
I suspect he’ll go on the top 10

 

[SchuPie]

I was wrong on Buller. So nobody taking 6?

Unless it’s a normal player

View attachment 2485341View attachment 2485342

People are going to melt over it not being kept for McGuane…

 

[Cousin of Daicos]

People are going to melt over it not being kept for McGuane…

Giving Buller 34 is absolutely nasty work

Then letting Tom go to Adelaide as a train on?

 

[SchuPie]

Giving Buller 34 is absolutely nasty work

Then letting Tom go to Adelaide as a train on?

I just want our list spots to go to the best players available that were able to obtain by drafting or trading
I don’t care who they are

 

[BillyElliott]

Giving Buller 34 is absolutely nasty work

Then letting Tom go to Adelaide as a train on?

How long were we expected to hold #34 for?

Tom was invited by Crows to be a train on. We have no control over that.

We don't have a list spot available to offer him a train on spot.

 

[Vicky Park]

I loved Mick McGuane. But holding his number in reserve until…what exactly?

Sentimental nonsense. We didn’t draft his son. It’s done.

 

[granniewolf]

I loved Mick McGuane. But holding his number in reserve until…what exactly?

Sentimental nonsense. We didn’t draft his son. It’s done.

It certainly sends the message that the door that was left ajar has been slammed shut.

 

[Pragmatic Shill]

It certainly sends the message that the door that was left ajar has been slammed shut.

Oh please.

 

[jmac70]

Giving Buller 34 is absolutely nasty work

Then letting Tom go to Adelaide as a train on?

Nothing nasty about it. Hopefully Buller makes the number his own.

 

[SchuPie]

No. 6
Options

• Zak Butters
• Zac Bailey
• Ben King
• Bailey Humphrey

 

[windchimes]

No. 6
Options

• Zak Butters
• Zac Bailey
• Ben King
• Bailey Humphrey

The scenes on here when it gets announced that Ned Long will pull on the #6 jumper in 2026

 

[SchuPie]

The scenes on here when it gets announced that Ned Long will pull on the #6 jumper in 2026

Fair call

 

[BillyElliott]

Fair call

Will be fine, we'll have a few other free numbers going into 27 anyway.

 

[Aussie pie]

Whoever wrote this needs to get the sack. Tony Shaw wore 22 not 32. We all know this except the kid or AI that wrote this. Does no one check these things before putting them on our website, yes our own website stuffed this up.

 

[Jen2310]

View attachment 2485648
Whoever wrote this needs to get the sack. Tony Shaw wore 22 not 32. We all know this except the kid or AI that wrote this. Does no one check these things before putting them on our website, yes our own website stuffed this up.

It is a bit factual, so not a total lie..

"But his first five games - in his debut season of 1978 - came in different jumpers, No.56 and No.32."

The Pies' numbers game

The Herald Sun's Glenn McFarlane has uncovered the jumper numbers that several Magpie stars wore in their early years in Black and White.

www.collingwoodfc.com.au

 

[BillyElliott]

View attachment 2485648
Whoever wrote this needs to get the sack. Tony Shaw wore 22 not 32. We all know this except the kid or AI that wrote this. Does no one check these things before putting them on our website, yes our own website stuffed this up.

It's pretty easy to find that he did wear 32 for a couple of games.

 

[Aussie pie]

It's pretty easy to find that he did wear 32 for a couple of games.

The way it’s written is that he was the best player to wear it. “The most accomplished player to wear it” so a couple of games early in his career is better than Clokes whole career. You ask anyone what number Shaw played they’ll say 22. That’s like saying Pendles was the best 16 we’ve ever had.

 

[BillyElliott]

The way it’s written is that he was the best player to wear it. “The most accomplished player to wear it” so a couple of games early in his career is better than Clokes whole career. You ask anyone what number Shaw played they’ll say 22. That’s like saying Pendles was the best 16 we’ve ever had.

Did he wear 32? Yes, he did.

 

[Vinnie Vegas]

View attachment 2485648
Whoever wrote this needs to get the sack. Tony Shaw wore 22 not 32. We all know this except the kid or AI that wrote this. Does no one check these things before putting them on our website, yes our own website stuffed this up.

Have you considered not calling for people to be sacked over your perception of an error that isn't actually an error and is factually correct?

Or is it your mission to overreact like a bell-end at all costs?

 

[TradeDraft]

View attachment 2485648
Whoever wrote this needs to get the sack. Tony Shaw wore 22 not 32. We all know this except the kid or AI that wrote this. Does no one check these things before putting them on our website, yes our own website stuffed this up.

Shows how bad our Media Team is

 

[BillyElliott]

Shows how bad our Media Team is

Shaw did also wear #32