Taylor
Community Leader
- Staff
- #2,726
Sorry, bit confused, sounds like you would have positions for them all in the team or is just these the positions you'd play them in when they played? Having Cox as the guy who brings it to ground wouldnt matter if there's no one there capable of being a ground ball threat.
I think they can all be played in the same team with the appropriate game plan and smalls in the side around them. If the game plan is "get the thing forward" then we need representation forward or we won't be able to lock it in even with the fastest smalls in the world chasing.
Everyone wants the ball use to be elite all the time but we have only the players we have. We have two guys I can rely on to hit a target leading at them, if the kick is off the ball spills into the corridor and rebounds all the way to our defensive fifty.
Our guys will get exhausted with constant transition footy, we have to minimise the workloads which means keeping the ball in parts of the ground longer. I think that happens, with long bombs, by having a taller forward line if they can create a contest and create a stoppage. If they can't contest, mark or create a stoppage they will have a great view of their opponents walking it out.
I am expecting us to have clearance dominance translating to inside fifty dominance. I want the ball to stay there because I think we are one of the worst teams, at least we were in 2024, at repeat contests inside forward fifty (think stoppages, ball ins etc).
We either get better users, elite one on one tall forwards and get out of their way, or big guys who throw their weight around to not be beaten foward.
I don't think we can change the users, we have two, we have two to three elite forwards too. The cute kick inside the corridor has us come unstuck too much.





Good luck anyone stopping that.

