Trades Round 6 trades

[Shadow89]

Looking forward to bringing in Whit on Sunday night. Lloyd, Laird and Whit all in the same backline, will be a very pretty sight indeed

 

[Beau_Waters for PM]

Which is better for my second trade (first trade locked in with Duurs to Hately via Stack DPP)
1. non playing 170k ruck for ROB (have Grundy/Gawn playing), or
2. Burgess to Hayes (via Atkins DPP)? This will result in Atkins playing as Rozee is injured I think (Atkins done alright last few weeks though, and I'm definitely sick of Burgess poor scores)

Team is:
Whitfield, Lloyd, Laird, Smith, Hore, Scrimshaw (Wilkie, Stack)
Cripps, Brayshaw, Crouch, Taranto, Cogs, Walsh, Constable, Hately (Ross, Atkins)
Grundy, Gawn (Fort, Cameron)
Danger, Worpel, Rozee, Drew, Parker, Petru (Burgess, Schulz)

Have $527k in the bank, so this is just more of a cash grab again - not really sure who to bring in to directly improve the above?

I would be upgrading Parker to the best FWD you can afford - Boak, Billings, Ebert, (probably not Kelly as he may be tagged by Hutchings this week).

You're pretty settled down back and in the mids for now, just a case of downgrading the rookies when maxed out and then upgrading those FWDs ASAP (I'd say Petrucelle would be next in line once his 115 cycles out, he will probably be averaging around 50 for the season).

 

[Beau_Waters for PM]

Looking forward to bringing in Whit on Sunday night. Lloyd, Laird and Whit all in the same backline, will be a very pretty sight indeed

Nice work. All set for Laird to take off, which I'm sure he will.

 

[Saints2001]

I would be upgrading Parker to the best FWD you can afford - Boak, Billings, Ebert, (probably not Kelly as he may be tagged by Hutchings this week).

You're pretty settled down back and in the mids for now, just a case of downgrading the rookies when maxed out and then upgrading those FWDs ASAP (I'd say Petrucelle would be next in line once his 115 cycles out, he will probably be averaging around 50 for the season).

Yeah fair enough - ok, sounds like a plan. Just didn't want to settle on a forward until another game or so but you're right, Parker has been doing minimally of late, and Burgess as well, although at least he is just on the bench for now.

Thanks all, appreciate the tips.

 

[nob2210]

Hately out!

 

[Anzac16]

Hately out!

Can't believe that. Would have locked in Ross without a second thought knowing that. Frustrating.

 

[freo_leo29]

Hately dropped wow, surprising there

Clark and Burgess out, defs get them out now

Scott dropped again, would drop if anyone hasn't already

 

[SM]

WTF so because Hately is out I can't reverse my trades because I traded out Rozee and shifted Stack back?

Surely if I now trade out a different defender I could revert to having Rozee in defence and ditch Hately?

What a stupid set up.

 

[happy_eagle]

Burgess and Clark to Hayes and Answerth probably at this stage

Answerth isn't a possession type player is he ? (it's for D8 anyway)

 

[SM]

It's not exactly a partial lockout if the four players I have traded have not yet played and yet one trade is locked.

 

[Rion]

Praise be to whoever it was that reminded me on here that you could shift Stack for Duursma without it being a trade. Really didn't expect Hately to be dropped. Still bit unsure on Hayes JS but I suppose I've gotta get him now.

 

[Thetrader15]

Hately out!

WTF...Now what do I do

 

[_Cayz_]

It's not exactly a partial lockout if the four players I have traded have not yet played and yet one trade is locked.

I think if you moved someone who has played around the team the trade locks. Happened to me too.

 

[Thetrader15]

I guess I can keep Hatley as the trade in and get the 90 from Ross...if only I knew he would be back next week.

What more could have he done to keep his spot

 

[Thetrader15]

When is lockout?

 

[SM]

I think if you moved someone who has played around the team the trade locks. Happened to me too.

Sure but I could easily move everyone else back and shift Hately back out without it impacting players who have already played. Bit dumb.

 

[4tune8]

Sure but I could easily move everyone else back and shift Hately back out without it impacting players who have already played. Bit dumb.

Same here
At least I can bench Constable and get Ross's 92
Would be great to have a rolling lockout like SC, could loop Burgess (def) and Bines (fwd) if so

 

[TedDougChris]

Looking like a Burgess to Corbett second trade for me.

If Clark is managed, he might be back shortly. Burgess has no value unless going straight to a $170k rookie.

 

[happy_eagle]

Would be great to have a rolling lockout like SC, could loop Burgess (def) and Bines (fwd) if so

No thanks
Not a fan of rolling lockouts or loopholes.

 

[TedDougChris]

Thoughts on Larkey (North) anyone ??

 

[stormee]

Risking Answerth sight unseen... wish me luck lads!

 

[JADED]

Reverse trade time.
F.U GWS, Hately was expensive anyway.
Corbett & Larkey $170k is pretty uninspiring team changes but it gets rid of Burgess & Schulz.
That or could upgrade a midpricer.

 

[JADED]

Thoughts on Larkey (North) anyone ??

Hes played before, and let's just say Balta & Burgess put him to shame. He can't go under $170k at least.
Can only hope he's improved 2 years on but I hate relying on key forwards to score. Port smashed Kennedy/Darling last week so not holding out much hope for Larkey.

 

[TedDougChris]

Hes played before, and let's just say Balta & Burgess put him to shame. He can't go under $170k at least.
Can only hope he's improved 2 years on but I hate relying on key forwards to score. Port smashed Kennedy/Darling last week so not holding out much hope for Larkey.

Reversed trade......

 

[Crashy]

best rookie this week forward or back is Mitch Lewis isn't it?