Remove this Banner Ad

Test The Ashes Fourth Test December 26-30 1000hrs @ The MCG

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gough
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

Who will win?


  • Total voters
    66
  • Poll closed .

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

George has a sober opinion of the pitch. He does seem a bit worn down by thiis series though, it could be a bout of ennui.

 
It says a lot about the state of the modern long game that Australia (supposedly the best team in the world) was all out for 152 against a very second rate English bowling attack.

It seems that most batsmen need "roads" these days to score consistently because in the main, their techniques are worse than ordinary.
 
Of all the day one stumps scores in this series this is the first time we’ve been ahead of the game.
To illustrate:

T1

Eng 172
Aus 9/129

T2

Eng 9/325
(They were 9/264 and had seemingly wrestled back the momentum)

T3

Aus 8/326
(It was the consensus this was unders after winning the toss on a flat wicket)

T4

Aus 152
Eng 110
Aus 0/4
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Happy to have this out again, that days cricket was 100x better than anything at Adelaide. Maybe slightly too much in the bowlers favour with no one making a half century, but that's real exciting cricket when every ball matters.
 
Whoever gave Bay 13 to the Poms should be charged with treason. Terrible decision.
 
Yeah, I have no frame of reference for how many degrees of movement makes it "flat", "difficult to bat on", whatever.

But I suppose Adelaide on day 1 being flat and having 0.5 degrees of movement, and Perth being sporting (but not difficult to bat on, maybe slightly on the bowler side of friendly) being 0.66. Then Melbourne being 0.83 means the difference between it and Perth in terms of day 1 seam movement is approximately similar to Perth and Adelaide.

That is, Melbourne is harder to bat on at a similar amount that Perth was hard to bat on compared to Adelaide.

It seems to me that maybe 0.6-0.65 degrees of movement is ideal for a day 1 pitch that should deteriorate for day 5, so clearly 0.83 is ridiculous.
The pitch will probably improve rather than deteriorate.
 
Welcome to my world…doesn’t happen anymore.

Do whatever feels comfy but don’t forget to slog as many thru the leg side as you can, before you miss the inevitable straight one.
Yep we got coached to open the face to run the ball through gully early and being a LH work the ball off middle leg through square and to fine leg .
We jokingly called it the reverse 'V' .
I hated it .

Was ok on a road or the better premier tracks but going back to club cricket it seriously mucked you up and took ages to sort out.

This was 20 odd years ago so not new and the flow on is now ingrained down the levels .
 
This isn’t good for Test cricket, they had to do something because Tests at one point were to in favour of the batsmen but it’s now too far in the other direction.
We just had a 5 day test in Adelaide with a result & people here were whinging about the pitch not doing enough throughout the 5 days..
 

Remove this Banner Ad

what's the consensus on the pitch?

doing too much or just bad batting?

commentators don't seem to think its that bad, but its definitely in the bowlers favour.
 
The curators have zero responsibily here. All on the horrible batting.

George has a sober opinion of the pitch. He does seem a bit worn down by thiis series though, it could be a bout of ennui.


It was certainly lively and I thought it actually did more for us with the ball than when they bowled.

Now that is almost certainly length, the Poms dead set STILL haven't worked that out. They bowled well in parts but just can't sustain it.

I think there were more Aussie batsmen got themselves out than Poms. Carey and Weatherald in particular.

Man, how about we put the leg glance away for a bit when there's a leg slip in. Travis Head is another one who needs to put that shot away, it didn't get him out but I shut my eyes every time there's a ball in that area to him. Steve Smith appears to have worked out that the leg glance is a zero sum game with a leg slip in. It can't take that much analysis surely.

Instinctive? Maybe. But not too many players give catching practice to the slips, and, to me, this is what's happening with the leg slip. The Poms have got a few cheap wickets with that ball/position this series.

Carey is a wonderful batsman but, let's be honest, he has a spectacular talent for getting out dumb.
 
Rob Keys making apologies, sort of. What a large noggin', geewizz, must be at least 8 kilos!

 
Freddie around the wicket to Gilly made me realise we were actually mortal. And I’m trouble
Gilchrist's batting really got found out that series, and was a significant contributor to us losing imo.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Very much the Greig Chappell way of batting. Playing only in the arch between mid off and mid on until you get your eye in.
A bit different to Harry Brook’s first ball.
A hybrid? :)
 
Yep I mean there’s a bit in it but nothing today told me it was unplayable. It’s certainly not an all out 152 and all out 110 pitch
With semi-competent batting it was a 200+ pitch, with average Test batting 250+. Especially with Carse giving 40 freebies for no threat.
 
In 2017-18 it was a total pudding.

In 2018-19 it was just flat.

In 2024-25 it was sporting, but still possible to make good totals on.

In 2025-26 we now apparently have extravagant seam movement.

The thing that puzzles me is that the GABBA 2022/23 & SCG 2024/25 pitches both facilitated considerable seam movement AND had more even (EDIT: uneven) bounce to boot, and yet neither led to 20 wicket days (the former came close, though). What gives?

There was some ordinary batting and some very good bowling, but surely that wasn't the only reason?
90+% of the reason.
 
‘hilarious and smart’ for schoolboys, much the same as fart jokes and The Footy Show.

Did you read the post you replied to?

‘Hilarious and smart’ referred to the strategy, not the content (see also ‘elite-tier mind games’)

My only reference to the content of Marnus’ chat was: ‘nonsensical, monotonous diatribe’

Were you being lazy or disingenuous?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top