Banter FOOTY Banter! - Who will be better in 2026? Carlton or Collingwood Part 9

[Fadge]

Jeez wormy you're getting desperate when your trying to use some linguistic pedantic shite to suggest that 4 wins and a draw from 9 games isn't 50%.

They're not accustomed to using such high numbers as the numerator...

 

[Ctracks]

Hit a nerve, I see.

Collingwood prioritising breaking individual records & maximising the marketing opportunity over winning games, the Daicos BnF overthrow, bad look, bad for culture. Tut tut.

You saying hitting a nerve = you
Carlton has a 21st century culture of being rubbish.
Dick picks anyone?

 

[Fadge]

You saying hitting a nerve = you
Carlton has a 21st century culture of being rubbish.
Dick picks anyone?

Good to see them up and about after a Collingwood loss, and Carlton not getting beaten by that much...

Great weekend for Carlton supporters!

 

[RCAB]

Jeez wormy you're getting desperate when your trying to use some linguistic pedantic shite to suggest that 4 wins and a draw from 9 games isn't 50%.

Collingwood’s 2026 win rate is 44.4% if you count wins only. It's not 50%.

I would say that aligning yourself with a particular Collingwood poster is a sure way of guaranteeing your Bigfooty death. The amount of illogical stuff they post is off the charts.

 

[Fadge]

Collingwood’s 2026 win rate is 44.4% if you count wins only. It's not 50%.

I would say that aligning yourself with a particular Collingwood poster is a sure way of guaranteeing your Bigfooty death. The amount of illogical stuff they post is off the charts.

Here comes the Algorithm Worshipper to the rescue!

I'm sure your Blooser friends appreciate your, ah, support!

 

[RCAB]

Imagine arguing half = 44%

 

[sr36]

Collingwood’s 2026 win rate is 44.4% if you count wins only. It's not 50%.

I would say that aligning yourself with a particular Collingwood poster is a sure way of guaranteeing your Bigfooty death. The amount of illogical stuff they post is off the charts.

If you processed my post, you'd know why I spoke about pedantic linguistic shite and wouldn't have come in with exactly that.

 

[RCAB]

If you processed my post, you'd know why I spoke about pedantic linguistic shite and wouldn't have come in with exactly that.

Just so you know, doubling down on your arguments doesn't change the Collingwood win rate, which is at 44% this season.

 

[Fadge]

If you processed my post, you'd know why I spoke about pedantic linguistic shite and wouldn't have come in with exactly that.

Your assuming he has the ability to comprehend and process a statement. First mistake.

 

[RCAB]

I can't see why you guys struggle with mathematical models when you can't even divide by 2.

 

[Worm4]

4.5 from 9 games ya fool.

As good as win ratio as Carlton have had this century.

Poor, pathetic Bloosers.

0.5 is a win now. Oh boy...
Whats the draw ratio then ?

 

[RCAB]

0.5 is a win now. Oh boy...
Whats the draw ratio then ?

This is all starting to make complete sense with Collingwood nuffies who have been misunderstanding mathematical models and player ratings on Bigfooty for a long time.

They actually think 9/2=5

 

[Fadge]

0.5 is a win now. Oh boy...
Whats the draw ratio then ?

If they stick with this pedantic BS, they're 'only' 3 wins behind Collingwood.

What great times for a Blooser!

 

[Worm4]

This is all starting to make complete sense with Collingwood nuffies who have been misunderstanding mathematical models and player ratings on Bigfooty for a long time.

They actually think 9/2=5

Its fadgistics at its best.

 

[Fadge]

They actually think 9/2=5

Um, news for you....

No, we don't.

What a fool.

We actually think 9/2 = 4.5.

And guess what?

 

[sr36]

Just so you know, doubling down on your arguments doesn't change the Collingwood win rate, which is at 44% this season.

You're doubling down on pedantry. And feel you have to explain it, despite it being obvious that everyone knows the pedantic point you're making. Who would have thought a Hawk fan would think they're the smartest in the room, whilst not even being smarter than Wormy ...

 

[Fadge]

You're doubling down on pedantry. And feel you have to explain it, despite it being obvious that everyone knows the pedantic point you're making. Who would have thought a Hawk fan would think they're the smartest in the room, whilst not even being smarter than Wormy ...

If he befriends Wormy and the like, he will be the smartest guy in the room.

Highest IQ of 45 though...

 

[RCAB]

Who would have thought a Hawk fan would think they're the smartest in the room,

Hate to break it to you, but it's not a high bar in here.

 

[sr36]

Hate to break it to you, but it's not a high bar in here.

Don't know. You thought Wormy's obvious point was really clever and felt it needed explaining. That put you a rung below Wormy.

 

[Fadge]

Don't know. You thought Wormy's obvious point was really clever and felt it needed explaining. That put you a rung below Wormy.

And as part of his explanation, he tells us that because we're saying Collingwood have a 50% win rate, we're saying we've won 5 from 9 games...

Wowee.

 

[RCAB]

Don't know. You thought Wormy's obvious point was really clever

Did I? Primary school level maths is now really clever?

and felt it needed explaining. That put you a rung below Wormy.

Ok, and?

 

[Worm4]

Don't know. You thought Wormy's obvious point was really clever and felt it needed explaining. That put you a rung below Wormy.

Which puts you a rung below RCAB

 

[Fadge]

Did I? Primary school level maths is now really clever?

Well you seem to think it is.

Which tells us everything we need to know...

 

[RCAB]

And as part of his explanation, he tells us that because we're saying Collingwood have a 50% win rate, we're saying we've won 5 from 9 games...

Wowee.

I mean... like I told you earlier sr36...

 

[Worm4]

Um, news for you....

No, we don't.

What a fool.

We actually think 9/2 = 4.5.

And guess what?

Try the model the AFL used for win ratios to confirm ladder positions way back when - use that when determining your outcome.
Hope this helps