My attempt. Partially judging from my expectations, injuries, etc etc.
2. 5/10. Impressed almost every outing, but broke down again. Decision won't be made on form.
3. 4/10. Looked OK, but not great. Again, decision based on his body & whether they think he can improve.
4. 11/10. Uberstar.
5. 6/10. Did his job & did it well, most of the time.
6. 3/10. Tailed off. Badly. Need leadership from our 6+ year players - does not provide.
7. 3.5/10. Tailed off. Badly. Need leadership from our 6+ year players - does not provide.
8 N/A. Decision won't be made on basis of form - they know he can play, but he is 27/28 odd.
9 N/A. Decision won't be made on basis of form. Jury out on ability too.
10. N/A. Sad end, good clubman.
11. 5/10. Decent start. Not much after that. Very very important to the side going forward.
12. 5/10. Decent start. Not much after that. Very very important to the side going forward.
13. Is this Long? Exactly! Who'd know. TTFN.
14. 4/10. Did his job at times, shown up quite a bit when asked to do other roles. Again, is that good enough from a 6+ year player? Will be shopped, you'd think.
15. 6/10. Great start, down patch, good finish. Very important.
16. 3/10. Forgettable
17. 4/10. Mixed fortunes - decent-to-good early, very poor in the second half of the year. Played a bit of footy down back & up forward, which gives him an extra string to his bow.
18. 5.5/10. Clearly a leader. Cracks in. All class. Huge unit. Can't love him enough, but a slightly disappointing year none-the-less.
19. 4/10. Old warhorse, outrun by young bucks a few times, but still played some good footy at times as well, and had a few injuries into the bargain.
20. N/A. TTFN. Hope he is retained for the reserves.
21. 7/10. Good early off a back flank, struggled when put into the middle, then came through it pretty strongly in the last 3-4 rounds. Love.
22. 8/10. Played more than I thought, at a better level than I thought. Very promising.
23. 6/10. Could easily have been 8 if he'd stayed fit. Leading light in the midfield when he got in there.
24. 7/10. Did nothing wrong when brought in.
25. N/A.
26. 5/10. Good early. Bad late. Not a young skinny kid any more. Why is this? Is his body not right, is it in his head?
27. N/A.
28. N/A.
29. 6/10. Did his job most of the year.
30. 5/10. Absolute silk.... for half a year. Would've been pushing an 8 or 9.
31. 7/10. Too good. Still.
32. 4/10. Bit disappointing, young Trav. Second guessing himself maybe? Didn't look as confident to take it on, or ping at the biggest, hardest-to-miss target on the ground - and if he's not doing that, he's not much use.
33. N/A
34. 5/10. See Hooker, C: Good early. Bad late. Not a young skinny kid any more. Why is this? Is his body not right, is it in his head?
35. 4/10. Good glimpses. Great size. Seems to know what he's doing, and isn't shy despite only playing in trying conditions.
36. N/A
37. 1/10 - the 1 being for his Bulldogs game. TTFN.
38. N/A
39. 3/10. The biggest disappointment of the year, for mine. You'd expect a seasoned, strong, hard-working midfielder to improve as the season wore on. You'd expect him to win more ball as more opportunities opened up through injury. You'd expect a lot more than he delivered.
40. 8/10. Made every post a winner.
41. 5/10. About what I expected TBH - can win a bit of it, not overly damaging. Gives the list management team an option, if they're moving on others.
42. 6/10. Has a crack, most of the time.
43. 6/10. Some good footy in there, some not so much. Assumed the mantle of our best small back - disappointing to have him miss so many games.
44. 8/10. Highlight.
45. N/A.
46. 5/10. About what I expected, not going to immediately make us a 10 goal better side, but a viable option.
47. 5/10. Viable.
I guess the standout is how many of our established guys disappointed.
2. 5/10. Impressed almost every outing, but broke down again. Decision won't be made on form.
3. 4/10. Looked OK, but not great. Again, decision based on his body & whether they think he can improve.
4. 11/10. Uberstar.
5. 6/10. Did his job & did it well, most of the time.
6. 3/10. Tailed off. Badly. Need leadership from our 6+ year players - does not provide.
7. 3.5/10. Tailed off. Badly. Need leadership from our 6+ year players - does not provide.
8 N/A. Decision won't be made on basis of form - they know he can play, but he is 27/28 odd.
9 N/A. Decision won't be made on basis of form. Jury out on ability too.
10. N/A. Sad end, good clubman.
11. 5/10. Decent start. Not much after that. Very very important to the side going forward.
12. 5/10. Decent start. Not much after that. Very very important to the side going forward.
13. Is this Long? Exactly! Who'd know. TTFN.
14. 4/10. Did his job at times, shown up quite a bit when asked to do other roles. Again, is that good enough from a 6+ year player? Will be shopped, you'd think.
15. 6/10. Great start, down patch, good finish. Very important.
16. 3/10. Forgettable
17. 4/10. Mixed fortunes - decent-to-good early, very poor in the second half of the year. Played a bit of footy down back & up forward, which gives him an extra string to his bow.
18. 5.5/10. Clearly a leader. Cracks in. All class. Huge unit. Can't love him enough, but a slightly disappointing year none-the-less.
19. 4/10. Old warhorse, outrun by young bucks a few times, but still played some good footy at times as well, and had a few injuries into the bargain.
20. N/A. TTFN. Hope he is retained for the reserves.
21. 7/10. Good early off a back flank, struggled when put into the middle, then came through it pretty strongly in the last 3-4 rounds. Love.
22. 8/10. Played more than I thought, at a better level than I thought. Very promising.
23. 6/10. Could easily have been 8 if he'd stayed fit. Leading light in the midfield when he got in there.
24. 7/10. Did nothing wrong when brought in.
25. N/A.
26. 5/10. Good early. Bad late. Not a young skinny kid any more. Why is this? Is his body not right, is it in his head?
27. N/A.
28. N/A.
29. 6/10. Did his job most of the year.
30. 5/10. Absolute silk.... for half a year. Would've been pushing an 8 or 9.
31. 7/10. Too good. Still.
32. 4/10. Bit disappointing, young Trav. Second guessing himself maybe? Didn't look as confident to take it on, or ping at the biggest, hardest-to-miss target on the ground - and if he's not doing that, he's not much use.
33. N/A
34. 5/10. See Hooker, C: Good early. Bad late. Not a young skinny kid any more. Why is this? Is his body not right, is it in his head?
35. 4/10. Good glimpses. Great size. Seems to know what he's doing, and isn't shy despite only playing in trying conditions.
36. N/A
37. 1/10 - the 1 being for his Bulldogs game. TTFN.
38. N/A
39. 3/10. The biggest disappointment of the year, for mine. You'd expect a seasoned, strong, hard-working midfielder to improve as the season wore on. You'd expect him to win more ball as more opportunities opened up through injury. You'd expect a lot more than he delivered.
40. 8/10. Made every post a winner.
41. 5/10. About what I expected TBH - can win a bit of it, not overly damaging. Gives the list management team an option, if they're moving on others.
42. 6/10. Has a crack, most of the time.
43. 6/10. Some good footy in there, some not so much. Assumed the mantle of our best small back - disappointing to have him miss so many games.
44. 8/10. Highlight.
45. N/A.
46. 5/10. About what I expected, not going to immediately make us a 10 goal better side, but a viable option.
47. 5/10. Viable.
I guess the standout is how many of our established guys disappointed.




