Mega Thread 2013: Trade Hypotheticals

[19thcrow]

As if thats funny a pick 8 and pick 12 for pick 2 (which you'll draft a dud again with) maybe the 2nd rounder for watts could be sweetened slightly.

 

[1970crow]

LOL!! no way we will delist him why trade for him.

That makes no sense whatsoever.

 

[pulpdriver]

Docherty for a swap of first round picks?

Throw in your second rounder and it's a deal.

 

[19thcrow]

That makes no sense whatsoever.

LOL!! No way, we will delist him why trade for him. Better?

 

[God Save Max King]

*gif laughing at suggestion*

Not sure if srs. The trade was pretty good, you probably have not watched much of the Lions.

 

[DeeWong6996]

As if thats funny a pick 8 and pick 12 for pick 2 (which you'll draft a dud again with) maybe the 2nd rounder for watts could be sweetened slightly.

I have seen nothing of Docherty and Longer to suggest that they are worth their original draft selections. A second rounder for Watts is even more blasphemous.

 

[Theo X]

As if thats funny a pick 8 and pick 12 for pick 2 (which you'll draft a dud again with) maybe the 2nd rounder for watts could be sweetened slightly.

Barry Prendergast doesn't work for us anymore.

 

[1970crow]

LOL!! No way, we will delist him why trade for him. Better?

Surely you're taking the piss or I have completely misunderstood you. Are you saying that we would rather delist tambling and replace him with pick 110 than trade him for pick 50.

 

[DeeWong6996]

Not sure if srs. The trade was pretty good, you probably have not watched much of the Lions.

Yeah nah.

You probably have not watched much of the Dees, and I don't blame you. The last thing we need is a half back flanker and a ruckman, let alone two inexperienced ones. Why would we trade out potential for potential?

 

[texdog]

Throw in your second rounder and it's a deal.

How about we swap our first 3 rounds for yours and we get Dicherty as well
BRIS get: WBDs first, second and third
WBD get: Docherty, BRISs first, second, third.

 

[Theo X]

Not sure if srs. The trade was pretty good, you probably have not watched much of the Lions.

Longer's hardly played this year so he would've barely seen him regardless. The last thing we need is another ruckman or HBF'er though, which is why it would be a pointless trade for us. We need mids.

 

[19thcrow]

I have seen nothing of Docherty and Longer to suggest that they are worth their original draft selections. A second rounder for Watts is even more blasphemous.

And Watts is worth his? Longer is a ruck, his built well and wouldn't dominate at his age any way. Dochety uses the ball well and makes good decisions just needs more games.

 

[19thcrow]

Longer's hardly played this year so he would've barely seen him regardless. The last thing we need is another ruckman or HBF'er though, which is why it would be a pointless trade for us. We need mids.

You would delist Jammar and spencer if you got Longer.

 

[DeeWong6996]

And Watts is worth his? Longer is a ruck, his built well and wouldn't dominate at his age any way. Dochety uses the ball well and makes good decisions just needs more games.

Did I say that?

I like Longer and Docherty but it's just not the right time for the Dees. Jamar, Gawn, Spencer and Fitzpatrick will get us by in the ruck and we are filled to the brim with low production flankers with supposedly 'good' skills. Pick 2 would net us a lot more if we were to trade it.

 

[Theo X]

You would delist Jammar and spencer if you got Longer.

No we wouldn't because they're both contracted. Trade maybe.

 

[DeeWong6996]

You would delist Jammar and spencer if you got Longer.

You're embarrassing yourself. Jamar has been injured this year and Spencer has come on better than expected.

 

[19thcrow]

No we wouldn't because they're both contracted. Trade maybe.

That's a bummer for you guys.

 

[sackers5]

No we wouldn't because they're both contracted. Trade maybe.

Pretty sure Mark Neeld was also contracted ......

 

[19thcrow]

You're embarrassing yourself. Jamar has been injured this year and Spencer has come on better than expected.

Yeah i forgot Jamar was in fine form before that.

 

[Theo X]

That's a bummer for you guys.

Could be worse: we could've traded for Angus Graham.

 

[Theo X]

Pretty sure Mark Neeld was also contracted ......

What's your point? He was ruining our club. Jamar and Spencer aren't so bad they need to be paid out. Pedersen on the other hand....

 

[pulpdriver]

How about we swap our first 3 rounds for yours and we get Dicherty as well
BRIS get: WBDs first, second and third
WBD get: Docherty, BRISs first, second, third.

Doubt it. I imagine we'd want to place ourselves as high as possible in the first round and stockpile as many 2nd rounders as we can for players trades.

 

[19thcrow]

Could be worse: we could've traded for Angus Graham.

We don't play him though. Graham would make your best 22 easy as a midfielder too.

 

[Theo X]

We don't play him though. Graham would make your best 22 easy as a midfielder too.

Well that's the very definition of a successful trade. Touche on the second point.

 

[texdog]

Doubt it. I imagine we'd want to place ourselves as high as possible in the first round and stockpile as many 2nd rounders as we can for players trades.

How about Docherty for pick 22?