2015 Brownlow

[nooblet]

you would have though a major bank would actually use the term model properly, especially when using it 3 times per sentence.

subtracting dt points from supercoach points doesn't really qualify.

 

[KardiniaPark]

you would have though a major bank would actually use the term model properly, especially when using it 3 times per sentence.

subtracting dt points from supercoach points doesn't really qualify.

Then switching to 'a simpler system' because they didn't like the result one year

 

[Lion of Panjshir]

Is Hayes still at $4.50 for the Saints count?

#2010 #goodtimes

 

[Oraaaaazio]

Is Hayes still at $4.50 for the Saints count?

#2010 #goodtimes

I'll lay him at $4.50 if you want

 

[Lion of Panjshir]

Can anyone mount a strong case for their pick for Gold Coast?

I'm stumped.

 

[STANDBYHIRD12]

Can anyone mount a strong case for their pick for Gold Coast?

I'm stumped.

Lynch for mine. Was huge in 2 of there wins.

 

[happy_eagle]

Lynch for mine. Was huge in 2 of there wins.

Was also good in the draw against us (still had Bennell BOG, Priddis 2, Lynch 1)

 

[puntking]

Is Hayes still at $4.50 for the Saints count?

#2010 #goodtimes

would be money for jam hehe

 

[the_big_sav]

Dixon and bennel look to have 2 games each getting 2 or 3

Lynch should get a 3 and poll in 1-3 other games

Halls best games are in loses

Gaz could poll in 3 games but it would be ridiculous if he got more then 1s

Could go for lynch and wosrt case he ties or 3 way ties and get 3rd odds in a multi

 

[TheJanuaryMan]

Can anyone mount a strong case for their pick for Gold Coast?

I'm stumped.

My rnd by rnd count is page 14, I have rischitelli winning the Suns votes

 

[STANDBYHIRD12]

Essendon Stanton Heppell Quinella at @$3.25- $100

 

[Armesy]

Can anyone mount a strong case for their pick for Gold Coast?

I'm stumped.

I have
Dixon 6
Ablett 6
Bennell 5
Hall 5
Risci 4
Lynch 4

Wouldn't surprise me if the order was totally reversed on brownlow night. Its a raffle.

 

[Skip_25]

Anyone seen the predictions from AFL Guru?

 

[Kedford]

Anyone seen the predictions from AFL Guru?

Nope, what does he have after that terrible year last year?

 

[Skip_25]

Nope, what does he have after that terrible year last year?

I haven't seen them yet, was trying to find out if it's worth it.

They claim to have picked the correct winner for the past four years!

 

[EightySix]

I haven't seen them yet, was trying to find out if it's worth it.

They claim to have picked the correct winner for the past four years!

No one would have singled out Priddis as last years winner.

Only chumps pay for these subscription dribble..

 

[Kedford]

I haven't seen them yet, was trying to find out if it's worth it.

They claim to have picked the correct winner for the past four years!

They definitely did not pick Priddis last year as if they did, they wouldn't have been giving everyone free subscriptions to this year's one to make up for last year.
Anyone have betjam?

 

[Skip_25]

They definitely did not pick Priddis last year as if they did, they wouldn't have been giving everyone free subscriptions to this year's one to make up for last year.
Anyone have betjam?

Did anyone actually see their tips last year or are you just assuming they didn't it?

I don't plan on actually following them in. I'm just trying to get as many different opinions as possible before laying down my bets.

 

[Kedford]

Did anyone actually see their tips last year or are you just assuming they didn't it?

I don't plan on actually following them in. I'm just trying to get as many different opinions as possible before laying down my bets.

I just followed most of the Brownlow pages on FB and all but one lost big, AFL guru was one of the worst, the backlash they copped was nuts especially because they bragged about their previous years. The one page I do remember winning didn't profit much either though.

 

[KardiniaPark]

I just followed most of the Brownlow pages on FB and all but one lost big, AFL guru was one of the worst, the backlash they copped was nuts especially because they bragged about their previous years. The one page I do remember winning didn't profit much either though.

It's because most of these pages are just kids that won $2000 from $100 5 years ago. The entire betting landscape has changed in that time. It's not as easy now as it was back then and they haven't adjusted.

They get lazy and use outside votes (herald sun, coaches votes, SC scores etc...) for half the games every week and by the end of the season their numbers are completely corrupted.

(IMO)

 

[jaymasha]

.5U on macrae and swan most votes for either club @ $18.75 (crown)

 

[TheJanuaryMan]

I have
Dixon 6
Ablett 6
Bennell 5
Hall 5
Risci 4
Lynch 4

Wouldn't surprise me if the order was totally reversed on brownlow night. Its a raffle.

Suns are one of the most hazardous ones of all. i reckon many have forgotten rischa's start to the season, hence why he is as much as $15 at some outlets, but it won't take a lot to win there. wouldn't go rushing into anything too short with this one.

 

[stuziman]

It's because most of these pages are just kids that won $2000 from $100 5 years ago. The entire betting landscape has changed in that time. It's not as easy now as it was back then and they haven't adjusted.

They get lazy and use outside votes (herald sun, coaches votes, SC scores etc...) for half the games every week and by the end of the season their numbers are completely corrupted.

(IMO)

I've come out of BigFooty semi-retirement just to like and comment on this post.

LISTEN TO KP People!!!!! We will never see the errors in odds that we saw in 2010 ever again. The landscape has well and truly changed. The majority of bookmakers do their own counts, pay close attention to competitors odds and markets, pay for the better services out there so that they can predict markets and probably manipulate them to sucker people in to go against positions, and quickly react to the money flow and move odds fast or pull popular markets. With that being said, I actually think this year represents the best chance in the last few years for a return on team multis for people who have done a full count (something I have not done) because of the many chances at a select few teams. Good luck to anyone who can predict bombers, dogs, tigers, GWS and GC teams.

(IMO)

 

[banana_bus]

I've come out of BigFooty semi-retirement just to like and comment on this post.

LISTEN TO KP People

Stopped reading here...

 

[TheExtractorFactor]

People keep mentioning these errors that existed in years past. Is anyone able to elaborate? It surprises me that bookies would be lazy in regards to a market as popular as the Brownlow, or was it far less popular then?