Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
I like your thinking but I fear you are being a little optimistic (little = a lot)
Get ready for the AFL to create another shitstorm to deflect, I am glad the Talia rubbish has been dealt with already. The AFL will be looking to smash another club if that's WADA's ruling.
ADELAIDE has become the ninth AFL club to be fined for failing to provide ASADA with up-to-date information about a player's whereabouts.
The Crows have been hit with a $2500 penalty for the breach.
They join Essendon, Port Adelaide, Richmond, St Kilda, Collingwood, Fremantle, Greater Western Sydney and the Sydney Swans, in breaking the same WADA rule.
In a statement, the AFL confirmed an Adelaide player had failed to keep the club informed of all his movements and contact details, althought the League did not name the player.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
18 is too many anyway.Can the AFL somehow go past this ruling? It'll destroy an entire club pretty much.
There's still time!
AFL House @AFL_House 3m3 minutes ago
AFL advises the Adelaide Crows have been sanctioned $2500 for a failure to provide up-to-date player whereabouts information to ASADA.
Keep shitting in your own nest AFL. The karma will be a bitch when we fight back and contest the way you run your corrupt organisation.
Don't hog the pipe all to yourself, pass it round man [emoji41]
If he was a crows player he would definately be going home next year.Doesn't matter , as Wines will be going back to Victoria next season
Lol. Looks like he's saying "this is shit."![]()
Kid on front left seems thrilled to be there
Excuse me?
He was asking what is up, bandwagoner.
He's not a bandwagonear, he's been following Port Adelaide since the 1870's.
But they would still be benefiting from a punishment, which simply cannot happen. If they lost say 50% of their best 22 (for argument sake) it is without a doubt they would finish bottom or very close to. They would then receive the number one pick (or close to) when in actual fact there would be team(s) with a worse team than them. I'm not saying I have the solution, and I'm not suggesting take away their picks all together (because they've already had draft sanctions as you pointed out).The punishment is losing the players and finishing last. Getting the first pick is as a result of where that club finishes. Getting a priority pick i'd argue against, but not changing draft picks. Unless the pick is removed altogether as an AFL imposed club penalty, but they've already had their go at that.
Doubt that very much. He'll be another xmas unwrapping LOL.Doesn't matter , as Wines will be going back to Victoria next season
I know right. It would be the most stupid event since the beginning of time itself (time - which Port invented BTW)I can imagine if our club had promoted signing two players on one year extensions to see them play at 31 years old, the Power fans would totally not be laughing at us...
What makes him think I'm a bandwagoner?![]()
What makes him think I'm a bandwagoner?![]()