Remove this Banner Ad

2015 Non-Crows AFL Discussion - Pt. 1

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I like your thinking but I fear you are being a little optimistic (little = a lot)

Get ready for the AFL to create another shitstorm to deflect, I am glad the Talia rubbish has been dealt with already. The AFL will be looking to smash another club if that's WADA's ruling.

There's still time!

AFL House ‏@AFL_House 3m3 minutes ago
AFL advises the Adelaide Crows have been sanctioned $2500 for a failure to provide up-to-date player whereabouts information to ASADA.
 
ADELAIDE has become the ninth AFL club to be fined for failing to provide ASADA with up-to-date information about a player's whereabouts.

The Crows have been hit with a $2500 penalty for the breach.

They join Essendon, Port Adelaide, Richmond, St Kilda, Collingwood, Fremantle, Greater Western Sydney and the Sydney Swans, in breaking the same WADA rule.

In a statement, the AFL confirmed an Adelaide player had failed to keep the club informed of all his movements and contact details, althought the League did not name the player.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

There's still time!

AFL House ‏@AFL_House 3m3 minutes ago
AFL advises the Adelaide Crows have been sanctioned $2500 for a failure to provide up-to-date player whereabouts information to ASADA.

I have seen similar for other clubs over the offseason When the players are on their break (negotiated by the AFLPA) shouldn't it be the players responsibility not the club ?
 
Powerplayground_r23.jpg


Kid on front left seems thrilled to be there
Lol. Looks like he's saying "this is shit."
 

Remove this Banner Ad

The punishment is losing the players and finishing last. Getting the first pick is as a result of where that club finishes. Getting a priority pick i'd argue against, but not changing draft picks. Unless the pick is removed altogether as an AFL imposed club penalty, but they've already had their go at that.
But they would still be benefiting from a punishment, which simply cannot happen. If they lost say 50% of their best 22 (for argument sake) it is without a doubt they would finish bottom or very close to. They would then receive the number one pick (or close to) when in actual fact there would be team(s) with a worse team than them. I'm not saying I have the solution, and I'm not suggesting take away their picks all together (because they've already had draft sanctions as you pointed out).

All I'm saying is if I were a Brisbane or Carlton fan, and knew my team was likely to finish bottom, I'd be pretty annoyed losing the number one pick to another team because of their punishment. Otherwise Essendon's penalty will have an effect on other clubs.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I can imagine if our club had promoted signing two players on one year extensions to see them play at 31 years old, the Power fans would totally not be laughing at us...
I know right. It would be the most stupid event since the beginning of time itself (time - which Port invented BTW)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top