DimensionAren't the dimensions of the new ground very similar to Subi though? Don;t quote me on that though..
MCG 161 x 141
Perth 165 x 130
Subiaco 175 x 122
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
DimensionAren't the dimensions of the new ground very similar to Subi though? Don;t quote me on that though..
Yet the last 3 Brownlow winners aren't exactly known for being excellent by foot.
If we overlook somebody who offers a potential 'point of difference' for our pretty vanilla midfield I won't be very happy.
He's actually opposite to what you just said...From what I gather he is Mitchell like in that he is good for short passes and also Mitchell like in that he doesnt have penetration . That being said Galluci had most metres gained during the carnival .
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
He's under pressure from Duggan, Pharto, Cole, Nelson, etc, but his 2016 seems to be an outlier in his last 5 seasons. I wouldn't write him off yet, and as Bond said, kicking is king in the modern game, and Masto is good at delivering the footy. I am worried about the drop in his tackling numbers and 1%ers in the last couple of years, though that may be a result of a role change.Masto is in his last year as a regular top 22 pick, the guy hasn't delivered on game day. He is the last of 5 that I mentioned years back under another pseudonym that we need to be replaced with better to be a real flag chance - Ebert, Koby, Selwood and Rosa.
To Gallucci?Reckon zac merrett had a similar profile pre draft.
He's under pressure from Duggan, Pharto, Cole, Nelson, etc, but his 2016 seems to be an outlier in his last 5 seasons. I wouldn't write him off yet, and as Bond said, kicking is king in the modern game, and Masto is good at delivering the footy. I am worried about the drop in his tackling numbers and 1%ers in the last couple of years, though that may be a result of a role change.
The game has changed. His inability to stick a tackle and inability to break a tackle has IMHO seen him as depth but no more. Picking him is based on past performances not ability to deliver in the new world.He's under pressure from Duggan, Pharto, Cole, Nelson, etc, but his 2016 seems to be an outlier in his last 5 seasons. I wouldn't write him off yet, and as Bond said, kicking is king in the modern game, and Masto is good at delivering the footy. I am worried about the drop in his tackling numbers and 1%ers in the last couple of years, though that may be a result of a role change.
I'm not calling Galluci vanilla, I'm referring to our current midfield that I consider substandard.2) What you consider 'vanilla' others don't.
Kicking and effective disposal is very important but its only a part of the game. It's just unfortunate every other part of his game is so rubbish that its almost not worth having him in the team. Someone needs to take his spot.
He's under pressure alright and should be in the spotlight, you can't just rock up and get picked each week after doing nothing for 10 weeks straight. One of the biggest issues we have is we have too many big names not deliver week in and out ( Darling and LeCras come to mind also ) with no pressure to be dropped, players should have more performance components in their deals - imagine not getting paid if you get dropped back to WAFL ???? they will play like mother f!@#$% if they thought that would happen.He's under pressure from Duggan, Pharto, Cole, Nelson, etc, but his 2016 seems to be an outlier in his last 5 seasons. I wouldn't write him off yet, and as Bond said, kicking is king in the modern game, and Masto is good at delivering the footy. I am worried about the drop in his tackling numbers and 1%ers in the last couple of years, though that may be a result of a role change.
Here is what they stated. Note that this is what Michael Ablett and Twomey think are the best fit - not necessarily who they will take or best available.http://www.afl.com.au/draft/road-to-the-draft
They have us taking Berry with our first. I'd be very happy with that.
He's under pressure alright and should be in the spotlight, you can't just rock up and get picked each week after doing nothing for 10 weeks straight. One of the biggest issues we have is we have too many big names not deliver week in and out ( Darling and LeCras come to mind also ) with no pressure to be dropped, players should have more performance components in their deals - imagine not getting paid if you get dropped back to WAFL ???? they will play like mother f!@#$% if they thought that would happen.
I just watched a bunch of draft videos and I suddenly really rate Berry. I'd be very happy with him if we take him at 12.
There are a bunch on youtube that aren't just highlights, but more vision on his game.It would be more useful on making a determination on a player if they released all the footage not just the edited version that makes them all look like champions.
You answered your own question.Was listening to the radio this morning and heard Tim Gossage mention in passing really that Drew Petrie was a certainty to end up at West Coast as a player!
Anyone else heard anything more about this?? Please tell me it isn't true
Ok so who is next best player not on that particular list we could grab with our 2nd pickHere is what they stated. Note that this is what Michael Ablett and Twomey think are the best fit - not necessarily who they will take or best available.
View attachment 310542
One of the following:Ok so who is next best player not on that particular list we could grab with our 2nd pick
Was listening to the radio this morning and heard Tim Gossage mention in passing really that Drew Petrie was a certainty to end up at West Coast as a player!
Anyone else heard anything more about this?? Please tell me it isn't true