Remove this Banner Ad

Analysis 2017 List Management Discussion Part II

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
+++ Long post incoming +++

Still preferring a Whitfield/Hopper or Whitfield/Smith combo over Kelly.

Bear with me here:

Gibbs -> Adelaide
Lever -> WB
Pick 10 + Redpath -> Carlton

Casboult -> Richmond (FA)
Pick 20 -> Carlton (AFL will make it happen)

Pick 10 + Pick 20 -> GWS
Whitfield + Hopper -> Carlton

Pick 38 -> GC
Saad -> Carlton

Pick 56 -> Freo
Balic -> Carlton

2018 First Rounder + Jaksch -> Melbourne
Pick 12 + 2018 First Rounder -> Carlton

OUT: Gibbs, Casboult, Jaksch
IN: Whitfield, Hopper, Redpath, Saad, Balic
DRAFT: 2 (MID), 12 (MID), 74 (RUC)
2018 DRAFT: Swap firsts with Melbourne

The Gibbs deal here makes a lot of sense for all three parties.
If we do ask for a PP, can see us getting knocked back but being looked after with Levi's compo given our forward line state.
Taking Whitfield and Hopper likely allows GWS to retain Kelly if he's prepared to stay.
Saad has tricks, but not the consistency to justify any more than a late second/early third.
Balic rotting at Freo, has only gone down in value but could be an astute recruitment for us.

The Melbourne deal. Here it is. I've given this some thought - would it not be smart to target a club on the rise who think they're just entering their premiership window? Pick 12 in this draft doesn't really help Melbourne in the next few years. Pick 15+ in 2018 (where they'd expect to be) does even less. But a potential top 5 pick next year gives them some serious trade collateral for an established player, and Jaksch is a sweetener with risk, but plenty of upside for them if they can get him focused. We all know he's talented, and can play both ends of the ground - either covers down back to release Tom McDonald into the forward line, or plays forward himself and allows McDonald to go back to defense. And who knows, maybe a chance at finals will get Jaksch out of his malaise. It's a risky move for Melbourne, but has a lot of potential to improve their flag chances in a short period of time. Pick 5 and a young, talented swingman (who needs to find some motivation) for Pick 12 and 15ish.

Enough on Melbourne, how does it work for us. We go into next year knowing that we need to perform well to justify the trade, and it's more likely that Melbourne stumble and cough up Pick 12ish again than it is that they win the flag. Rebuild is pretty much done - we'll be waiting on BSOS and some FA's but the core of the list is now together.

Starting 22
Byrne, Jones, Marchbank
Docherty, Weitering, Saad
Williamson, Whitfield, Cuningham
Kreuzer, Cripps, Hopper
Petrevski-Seton, McKay, Curnow
Silvagni, Redpath, Murphy
I/C: E. Curnow, Fisher, Plowman, Balic

VFL Players
White, ASOS, Simpson
Pickett, Macreadie, Smedts
Palmer, Graham, Boekhorst
Phillips, Kerridge, Polson
Thomas, Rowe, Lamb
Lebois, Kerr, Wright
I/C: Pick 2, Pick 12, Pick 74, Rookies, whoever is left

Looking at that - the only players in the seniors that you're even worried about having to replace in the next 5 years are Jones (Macreadie), Kreuzer (Phillips?), Redpath (Kerr), Murphy (Polson) and Curnow (Pick 2). That essentially means that everyone we pick up from Pick 12 this year onwards is joining a club where they'll have to displace a quality player to get their spot. BSOS and Kerr will be fighting for a spot. Our first rounders through 2019-2022 are going to be fighting for spots. Furthermore, there's some genuine leadership and experience in that VFL side to help develop those kids, and there's depth on every line if we need to cover injuries in the seniors.

As far as list balance goes; the backline is rock-solid and has some genuine speed, the midfield has serious grunt supported by elite ball-users with pace, the forward line is still young, but has three talls with unique skillsets, a medium forward with footy smarts, and a couple of smalls who are great in traffic, and finally, the bench has a good mix of types to allow flexibility on gameday.


Pick my wishlisting apart - I'm ready :p
 
What do people think of these two trade scenarios?

Trade 1: Gibbs to Adelaide for Pick 8 (obtained for Lever or McGovern)
Trade 2: Picks 2, 8, 37 and 2018 3rd (37) for Kelly, 2018 1st (17), 2018 2nd (35), Player Cap Dump (Griffin?)

Outgoing: Gibbs, 2, 37, 2018 3rd,
Incoming: Kelly, 2018 1st, 2018 2nd, Griffin?

Outgoing valued at 4998 points for picks 2, 8, 37 and 2018 3rd
Incoming valued at 5176 points (pick 17 at 1025 points, Kelly at 3629 points - equates to picks 2 and 15, pick 35 at 522 points)) plus the cap dump player

This means our first pick in the draft is a 4th rounder however we get two first round picks next year in a better draft and move our 3rd up to a 2nd. We get the better value in terms of points plus a bonus player whilst GWS are satisfied with 2 excellent picks and what feels like good compensation for Kelly, next years 1st and a small downgrade on their 2nd. The salary dump also helps them to retain Hopper or go after Martin. A bit of win-win.

Obviously this doesn't help us this year but definitely gives us a much stronger hand at next year's draft where we could potentially go in with Picks 2, 17, 20, 35, 56 etc.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Just looking at the ladder and as the premiers usually come from the top 4; with how everyone loves to follow the leader it's quite interesting to see how these clubs have built their lists and what we could learn.

GWS nothing.
Adelaide. You don't need an elite midfield or many high draft picks. Just a lot of good players.
Geelong. Mid range team who didn't really go to the draft and topped up through trades and free agency.
Richmond. Another mid range team who topped up with a couple of handy players. Also only playing one key forward and a heap of smalls showing pressure is more important then structure
 
The talk from Trigg of adding experience to midfield suggests trading Gibbs AND Murphy is not on the cards

I made such a point not long ago. It's one thing to improve by way of trading an old for a new (and even then is Gibbs really that old, I mean he's been very durable) but it's another to actually get a net gain in quality mids and I think given our depth issues this is what the plan ought to be

How to get a +1 or +2 or even +3 in midfield

That's why Kelly for Gibbs alone doesn't appeal so much for me as its not a net gain

Keep Gibbs and trade 2 for Kelly and use Levi's 19 on the best available mid

There's a +1 min and maybe a +2 if SOS picks well, notwithstanding we are minus an experienced big fwd

Reality though is Gibbs is likely to leave, I think

I'd like to think we'd get a good mid at 10 if there's a three way trade

So trade 2 for Kelly and take a mid at 10 and also at 19 and we might be +2 if SOS picks well
I got the same impression.
The way I read it was if the deal is right we will trade our first for elite young talent other wise we will happily go to the draft.
 
Hypothetical idea - what is the general feel on this:

Gibbs for Lever
Weitering for Kelly

Booo!
Hiss!
Get off you hack!

Now we've got that out of the way, serious discussion - because it's both simple and surprisingly balanced across the board I think.
 
Hypothetical idea - what is the general feel on this:

Gibbs for Lever
Weitering for Kelly

Booo!
Hiss!
Get off you hack!

Now we've got that out of the way, serious discussion - because it's both simple and surprisingly balanced across the board I think.

Lever worth more than Gibbs
Kelly worth more than Weitering (At this point in time)
 
That sounds absolutely disasterous.

You have been pushing this barrow all year, and your scenarios offer no numerical improvement within a 4-year window, if at all. Please stop, and please stop calling the Tuohy scenario a clear win/win.

We cannot afford to shift Gibbs and Murphy and wind up with so little to show for it.
I agree with Harker and myself
It's definitely a win win for all concerned
Gibbs is going to be gone unless we don't get enough back
Murphy is thirty next year
Kelly and hopper are great ins and we do need to add to that plus keep development going on fisher, sps, polson, Cunningham

You can't sit there and worry about Murphy at this stage with those ins possible
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Lever worth more than Gibbs
Kelly worth more than Weitering (At this point in time)

Omeara worth more than Mitchell. Yet its not a perfect world out there.
A player who is out of contract is worth what a club is willing to pay for them. Dont compare players and what some clubs have given up for them in the past. It doesnt work like that
 
+++ Long post incoming +++

Still preferring a Whitfield/Hopper or Whitfield/Smith combo over Kelly.

Bear with me here:

Gibbs -> Adelaide
Lever -> WB
Pick 10 + Redpath -> Carlton

Casboult -> Richmond (FA)
Pick 20 -> Carlton (AFL will make it happen)

Pick 10 + Pick 20 -> GWS
Whitfield + Hopper -> Carlton

Pick 38 -> GC
Saad -> Carlton

Pick 56 -> Freo
Balic -> Carlton

2018 First Rounder + Jaksch -> Melbourne
Pick 12 + 2018 First Rounder -> Carlton

OUT: Gibbs, Casboult, Jaksch
IN: Whitfield, Hopper, Redpath, Saad, Balic
DRAFT: 2 (MID), 12 (MID), 74 (RUC)
2018 DRAFT: Swap firsts with Melbourne

The Gibbs deal here makes a lot of sense for all three parties.
If we do ask for a PP, can see us getting knocked back but being looked after with Levi's compo given our forward line state.
Taking Whitfield and Hopper likely allows GWS to retain Kelly if he's prepared to stay.
Saad has tricks, but not the consistency to justify any more than a late second/early third.
Balic rotting at Freo, has only gone down in value but could be an astute recruitment for us.

The Melbourne deal. Here it is. I've given this some thought - would it not be smart to target a club on the rise who think they're just entering their premiership window? Pick 12 in this draft doesn't really help Melbourne in the next few years. Pick 15+ in 2018 (where they'd expect to be) does even less. But a potential top 5 pick next year gives them some serious trade collateral for an established player, and Jaksch is a sweetener with risk, but plenty of upside for them if they can get him focused. We all know he's talented, and can play both ends of the ground - either covers down back to release Tom McDonald into the forward line, or plays forward himself and allows McDonald to go back to defense. And who knows, maybe a chance at finals will get Jaksch out of his malaise. It's a risky move for Melbourne, but has a lot of potential to improve their flag chances in a short period of time. Pick 5 and a young, talented swingman (who needs to find some motivation) for Pick 12 and 15ish.

Enough on Melbourne, how does it work for us. We go into next year knowing that we need to perform well to justify the trade, and it's more likely that Melbourne stumble and cough up Pick 12ish again than it is that they win the flag. Rebuild is pretty much done - we'll be waiting on BSOS and some FA's but the core of the list is now together.

Starting 22
Byrne, Jones, Marchbank
Docherty, Weitering, Saad
Williamson, Whitfield, Cuningham
Kreuzer, Cripps, Hopper
Petrevski-Seton, McKay, Curnow
Silvagni, Redpath, Murphy
I/C: E. Curnow, Fisher, Plowman, Balic

VFL Players
White, ASOS, Simpson
Pickett, Macreadie, Smedts
Palmer, Graham, Boekhorst
Phillips, Kerridge, Polson
Thomas, Rowe, Lamb
Lebois, Kerr, Wright
I/C: Pick 2, Pick 12, Pick 74, Rookies, whoever is left

Looking at that - the only players in the seniors that you're even worried about having to replace in the next 5 years are Jones (Macreadie), Kreuzer (Phillips?), Redpath (Kerr), Murphy (Polson) and Curnow (Pick 2). That essentially means that everyone we pick up from Pick 12 this year onwards is joining a club where they'll have to displace a quality player to get their spot. BSOS and Kerr will be fighting for a spot. Our first rounders through 2019-2022 are going to be fighting for spots. Furthermore, there's some genuine leadership and experience in that VFL side to help develop those kids, and there's depth on every line if we need to cover injuries in the seniors.

As far as list balance goes; the backline is rock-solid and has some genuine speed, the midfield has serious grunt supported by elite ball-users with pace, the forward line is still young, but has three talls with unique skillsets, a medium forward with footy smarts, and a couple of smalls who are great in traffic, and finally, the bench has a good mix of types to allow flexibility on gameday.


Pick my wishlisting apart - I'm ready :p

You had me glued, until you added Jaksch as part of a trade:)
 
Omeara worth more than Mitchell. Yet its not a perfect world out there.
A player who is out of contract is worth what a club is willing to pay for them. Dont compare players and what some clubs have given up for them in the past. It doesnt work like that

I realise that it is not a strict measuring scale, it will always be about supply and demand. Lots of demand for a guy like Kelly

You can twist, deny, manipulate any scenario, all I am yearning for, is a measured balanced trade scenario, one that is not overwhelming in our favour, because that just becomes fiction
 
Re. Tuohy: Who is it a loss for? Carlton got what they wanted, Geelong got what they wanted and Tuohy is getting a lot more money. Where's the loss?

Here's some bad news for you then. Murphy is 30 and won't be around for any Premiership tilt.
Gibbs wanted to go last year and may be allowed to leave this year........so where's the harm?

Not sure how anyone can lose themselves when bringing these facts up. Seem to be fair play to me.

I agree with Harker and myself
It's definitely a win win for all concerned
Gibbs is going to be gone unless we don't get enough back
Murphy is thirty next year
Kelly and hopper are great ins and we do need to add to that plus keep development going on fisher, sps, polson, Cunningham

You can't sit there and worry about Murphy at this stage with those ins possible
Who knows what will happen in 18 months time, and whether Murphy will be right to go for it. He's extremely professional about his preparation, and only injury is going to force him into retirement any time soon.

The Tuohy to Geelong component of that trade was not great, and we'd never have bothered if it weren't for the GWS component. I'm sure SOS would never have left himself in the lurch otherwise.

The notion of losing Gibbs and Murphy, only to get Kelly and an underdeveloped Hopper back while downgrading our picks is unpalatable from a commercial and football department perspective.

To recap the proposed trade one more time:

Gibbs, Murphy and Carltons next years first and a salary dump
for

Kelly, Hopper and GWS's next years first
Again, that's out captain, vice captain and probably a drop of 8-10 draft spots in the first round to get Kelly and Hopper while doing GWS a favour.
 
You had me glued, until you added Jaksch as part of a trade:)

Yeah, weird isn't it :huh:

Tried to approach it from Melbourne's perspective, and what they probably need most is another good tall at either end. Jaksch kinda fits that, albeit with concerns about work ethic. But as steak knives in a pick swap, he could be a huge win. Thought about Rowe as well, but I reckon he's too old for Melbourne given they're probably still two years off.

Take Jaksch out of it, what do you reckon would get that trade with Melbourne over the line?
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I realise that it is not a strict measuring scale, it will always be about supply and demand. Lots of demand for a guy like Kelly

You can twist, deny, manipulate any scenario, all I am yearning for, is a measured balanced trade scenario, one that is not overwhelming in our favour, because that just becomes fiction

But demand doesnt equate to much once a player chooses a club. A deal just must get done. It will be fair. But sos wont overpay
 
+++ Long post incoming +++

Still preferring a Whitfield/Hopper or Whitfield/Smith combo over Kelly.

Bear with me here:

Gibbs -> Adelaide
Lever -> WB
Pick 10 + Redpath -> Carlton

Casboult -> Richmond (FA)
Pick 20 -> Carlton (AFL will make it happen)

Pick 10 + Pick 20 -> GWS
Whitfield + Hopper -> Carlton

Pick 38 -> GC
Saad -> Carlton

Pick 56 -> Freo
Balic -> Carlton

2018 First Rounder + Jaksch -> Melbourne
Pick 12 + 2018 First Rounder -> Carlton

OUT: Gibbs, Casboult, Jaksch
IN: Whitfield, Hopper, Redpath, Saad, Balic
DRAFT: 2 (MID), 12 (MID), 74 (RUC)
2018 DRAFT: Swap firsts with Melbourne

The Gibbs deal here makes a lot of sense for all three parties.
If we do ask for a PP, can see us getting knocked back but being looked after with Levi's compo given our forward line state.
Taking Whitfield and Hopper likely allows GWS to retain Kelly if he's prepared to stay.
Saad has tricks, but not the consistency to justify any more than a late second/early third.
Balic rotting at Freo, has only gone down in value but could be an astute recruitment for us.

The Melbourne deal. Here it is. I've given this some thought - would it not be smart to target a club on the rise who think they're just entering their premiership window? Pick 12 in this draft doesn't really help Melbourne in the next few years. Pick 15+ in 2018 (where they'd expect to be) does even less. But a potential top 5 pick next year gives them some serious trade collateral for an established player, and Jaksch is a sweetener with risk, but plenty of upside for them if they can get him focused. We all know he's talented, and can play both ends of the ground - either covers down back to release Tom McDonald into the forward line, or plays forward himself and allows McDonald to go back to defense. And who knows, maybe a chance at finals will get Jaksch out of his malaise. It's a risky move for Melbourne, but has a lot of potential to improve their flag chances in a short period of time. Pick 5 and a young, talented swingman (who needs to find some motivation) for Pick 12 and 15ish.

Enough on Melbourne, how does it work for us. We go into next year knowing that we need to perform well to justify the trade, and it's more likely that Melbourne stumble and cough up Pick 12ish again than it is that they win the flag. Rebuild is pretty much done - we'll be waiting on BSOS and some FA's but the core of the list is now together.

Starting 22
Byrne, Jones, Marchbank
Docherty, Weitering, Saad
Williamson, Whitfield, Cuningham
Kreuzer, Cripps, Hopper
Petrevski-Seton, McKay, Curnow
Silvagni, Redpath, Murphy
I/C: E. Curnow, Fisher, Plowman, Balic

VFL Players
White, ASOS, Simpson
Pickett, Macreadie, Smedts
Palmer, Graham, Boekhorst
Phillips, Kerridge, Polson
Thomas, Rowe, Lamb
Lebois, Kerr, Wright
I/C: Pick 2, Pick 12, Pick 74, Rookies, whoever is left

Looking at that - the only players in the seniors that you're even worried about having to replace in the next 5 years are Jones (Macreadie), Kreuzer (Phillips?), Redpath (Kerr), Murphy (Polson) and Curnow (Pick 2). That essentially means that everyone we pick up from Pick 12 this year onwards is joining a club where they'll have to displace a quality player to get their spot. BSOS and Kerr will be fighting for a spot. Our first rounders through 2019-2022 are going to be fighting for spots. Furthermore, there's some genuine leadership and experience in that VFL side to help develop those kids, and there's depth on every line if we need to cover injuries in the seniors.

As far as list balance goes; the backline is rock-solid and has some genuine speed, the midfield has serious grunt supported by elite ball-users with pace, the forward line is still young, but has three talls with unique skillsets, a medium forward with footy smarts, and a couple of smalls who are great in traffic, and finally, the bench has a good mix of types to allow flexibility on gameday.


Pick my wishlisting apart - I'm ready :p

Well thought out post, but to throw a "spanner in the works", Whitfield is contracted until end of 2018. I don't think GWS would let him go, and that stuffs up your whole post I'm afraid. Unless they are not happy about his indiscretion last year with the drug incident, they won't let him go.
 
Yeah, weird isn't it :huh:

Tried to approach it from Melbourne's perspective, and what they probably need most is another good tall at either end. Jaksch kinda fits that, albeit with concerns about work ethic. But as steak knives in a pick swap, he could be a huge win. Thought about Rowe as well, but I reckon he's too old for Melbourne given they're probably still two years off.

Take Jaksch out of it, what do you reckon would get that trade with Melbourne over the line?

Would have to be Jones
 
Jimmae You've taken things a little out of context.
Go back to my original post and you will find these words: "Would something like (this) be a start point"

We're often accuse of pushing too hard in our own favour, so that's how that came about.
Main pieces are there and for us to massage to taste.
You've completely ruled out the impact on the playing group if you can't sell the trade to them, not to mention the learning curve required to get others up to scratch.

Kelly, Wilson and Griffen for 2 is a way better starting point.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top