The King!
Chosen One
Hope i'm not stepping on any toes posting here....
If you land 9 for Papley, would the below trade have any merit?
9+25 > Cats for 14+17
5 +14 or 5+17 for Daniher
how about an 18 team trade?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Hope i'm not stepping on any toes posting here....
If you land 9 for Papley, would the below trade have any merit?
9+25 > Cats for 14+17
5 +14 or 5+17 for Daniher
RealityI hope Bandi, but the way it appears to be unfolding I can see it happening.
Once again I hope but reality keeps saying no.
Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
I'd be offering you 14 and 17 if we made that swap with the Cats.Hope i'm not stepping on any toes posting here....
If you land 9 for Papley, would the below trade have any merit?
9+25 > Cats for 14+17
5 +14 or 5+17 for Daniher
Why would we still be playing 2 x 1st rounders?Hope i'm not stepping on any toes posting here....
If you land 9 for Papley, would the below trade have any merit?
9+25 > Cats for 14+17
5 +14 or 5+17 for Daniher
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
This is a hypothetical thread therefore all persons post their views.You just had a tantrum about us using picks that we don't even have yet, and may not ever get, to make a trade that we haven't even done yet, and may never do, and told us all it is sending us back to the darkest days of the club. And you need me to explain to you how that is melodrama?
What reality? No trades have been made. Talk about jumping and shadows.I hope Bandi, but the way it appears to be unfolding I can see it happening.
Once again I hope but reality keeps saying no.
Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
Thanks The King.well a few things, and look each to their own, so not having a go
but
1- we havent made a single move yet, so even if you are right and this would doom us forever, it hasnt happened yet
2- its all guess work, maybe 5 and 9 are duds, maybe daniher is perfect for us
3- the comp is designed for all clubs to fall, we could all reach consensus on the exact move to make, but eventually the club will have a down patch, we will probably win a spoon
4- if we did fall to last and useless now it wont be forever
just my view,
Thanks The King.
I accept your views but I am trying to get in front of it.
It easy to claim is it good or bad after the fact and revise statements.
I will be right or wrong or partially right or partially wrong but i am just feeling that that is going to happen.
I am always looking for relevant or interesting comments and willing to switch my view if I am convinced.
No melodramatic comments here. RK.
Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
Thanks The King.
I accept your views but I am trying to get in front of it.
It easy to claim is it good or bad after the fact and revise statements.
I will be right or wrong or partially right or partially wrong but i am just feeling that that is going to happen.
I am always looking for relevant or interesting comments and willing to switch my view if I am convinced.
No melodramatic comments here. RK.
Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
I have great faith in the Swans list management that is looking ahead several years to replace ageing players in key roles. Occasionally you get curveballs with long term injuries and players wanting to be traded but, by and large, the Swans have had a very measured approach to trading for their needs as required, several years in advance.That would be totally irresponsible of the Swans to do that. I'm confident that they are not that stupid.
That is not that stupid. I'd keep the GWS 2020 second - 6 and 25 is enough.Essendon board says this might be happening
Pick 5 to GWS
Pick 6 to Swans + 2nd round 2020
Swans: Daniher
Bombers: Pick 6, 25 & 2nd 2020
Do I need to start paying rent for the permanent lodgings I've apparently taken up in your head?Uh oh, here comes the thesis from the oft opinioned one!
I thought Shapes already was given it pops up every time I come on hereshould we get sponsorship for this thread
They could match on Green but still need to pay for him - if it came at 5 or 6 there late picks wouldn't be enough. I my maths and understanding is right they would need to use some of their 2020 firstso that equals.. 12 + 18 + Bonar for 3 + Green
good trading Giants
And you still have the paperclip in your pocket.trade papley for 9
trade 9 and 5 for 3 and 22
trade jones and 25 for 12
trade 3 and 12 for 1 and 15
trade 15 and 22 for daniher
draft rowell or anderson
flawless hey![]()
And you still have the paperclip in your pocket.
Almost right.trade papley for 9
trade 9 and 5 for 3 and 22
trade jones and 25 for 12
trade 3 and 12 for 1 and 15
trade 15 and 22 for daniher
draft rowell or anderson
flawless hey![]()
Picks are like monopoly money as far as I’m concearned.I thought Shapes already was given it pops up every time I come on here
GWS going hard for Demons pick 3 is a given. Will be interesting to see what comes out of that one.They could match on Green but still need to pay for him - if it came at 5 or 6 there late picks wouldn't be enough. I my maths and understanding is right they would need to use some of their 2020 first
Nope! It is not you...have another go.Is this me, Mick O.
Is this a forum about opinions?
Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
A master stroke even?Almost right.
If you can add a best 22 player to GC they would buy it.
That would be a masterpiece.
Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk