Remove this Banner Ad

News 2019 Rumour File - discuss rumours here!

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
They've got him over for a medical so I'd suggest they want him.

Reckon it'll have to wait a bit though, they simply won't have the picks to get it done until they ship out Steven and Carslile.

Just on that, ****ing Geelong again..... Watch the AFL bend the rules for them.

The rules include the ability of clubs to request an exemption. If the AFL allow it it’s not bending the rules, it’s applying the rules.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

The rules include the ability of clubs to request an exemption. If the AFL allow it it’s not bending the rules, it’s applying the rules.
They've given them one already, and if they give up a first for either Higgins or Steven they'll need another one in quick succession.

Essentially they will have said "you need to have X first rounders in 3 years..... except you don't"
 
Would he be worth 30 and 41? I’m worried about the chasm after our 3rd selection and am worried we won’t delist Mackay if he’s being replaced by someone selected at 100+
If we were going to delist Mackay we would have done it already, he’s going to get another year
 
They've given them one already, and if they give up a first for either Higgins or Steven they'll need another one in quick succession.

Essentially they will have said "you need to have X first rounders in 3 years..... except you don't"

But that’s exactly what they’ve said. It’s not a black and white rule, you can request exemption. The rule is in place to stop a club completely screwing up by trading out too many picks and stuffing their future. If they’re well run and aren’t shooting themselves in the foot, then the AFL will allow it.
 
If we were going to delist Mackay we would have done it already, he’s going to get another year


I am thinking the other way.

We would have signed him before the review even started to sneak it through before the review says we need a cleanout.
 
If we were going to delist Mackay we would have done it already, he’s going to get another year

Not convinced although wouldn’t be surprised. It could be that they’re waiting to see what else happens. If it’s a choice between him and an early 3rd we might have hope. Him and 105 and all is lost.
 
I am thinking the other way.

We would have signed him before the review even started to sneak it through before the review says we need a cleanout.
The review isn’t going to say we need a cleanout, it’s to assess footy department stuff rather than our playing list
 

Remove this Banner Ad

How many years is Keith wanting? I can’t see why we wouldn’t give him three. I don’t want to trade him for a pick 25+.


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
It's his final Contract .....not only th 3 -4 years ...but also the $$$

Can't say I blame him, as a late starter
 
Doggies have pick 30 and 41 and Bailey Wiliams that would interest us more than what the Saints have.

Not enough. Before his injury Keith would have been in AA contention. We need to get fair value based on either draft picks or a player of similar quality and position.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Pick 14 to 18 would be about fair.
Which means St Kilda have work to do to get him if they want him. Bulldogs will have a pixk near that range but I doubt they'd want to part with it for just Keath.

14 is too high IMO, 18 is about right.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top